Best Vaccine Resource Pages

NOTE:  All my future blog posts relating to health and vaccines will be at True Health Freedom.

With the possibility of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc., censoring vaccine content  (either deleting them entirely or having them not show up on searches), I'm making a list of links that go directly to the home pages of various pro-truth, pro-freedom, pro-choice, anti-mandatory, vaccine sites.  I'm sure it's not a complete list, so if you have any to add, please let me know.  At the end of this list will be a link to all the sites I've gone to to research vaccines.  Because most are from 3 years ago, they may not all work.  However, the link may still take you to the site, just not the article, in which case you may get a "page not found" notice.  If you delete everything after the ".com" in the address bar, you'll at least get to the site to explore it.

Some other thoughts:  What would probably be better than this page would be if all the sites listed here (plus the ones I've no doubt left out) got together to form one site where all their articles could be shared (while still maintaining their own sites).  So that whatever content they added to their site would also be posted on their shared site.  I think this would make things easier, although perhaps too complex?  There is a site now that could be used, and at least one of the vaccine sites is using it, called MeWe.com.  They say absolutely no censorship.  It's a social site like Facebook.

Here's the list I have so far:
The Highwire with Del Bigtree (Sign up here for TheHighwire.com coming soon) - Excellent
Children's Health Defense - with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. - Excellent
Vaccine Impact - Excellent
National Vaccine Information Center - Excellent
Stop Mandatory Vaccination - Excellent
Physicians for Informed Consent - Excellent
Revolution for Choice - could only find a Facebook page - Excellent
The Truth About Vaccines (also Facebook The Truth About Vaccines Docuseries) - Excellent
GreenMedinfo - Vaccines, Health, Herbs, & much more - Excellent
Health Impact News - Excellent
Child Health Safety - Excellent
Vaccine Papers - Links to a lot of excellent information
VaxTruth - another great resource - Excellent
Age of Autism - Excellent
Global Freedom Movement (GFM) Excellent
Thinking Moms Revolution
Jon Rappoport - Journalist who write about vaccines and lots of other things
The Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute (CMSRI) - Excellent
Health Nut News (HNN) - About vaccines and Health in general
The Mom Street Journal - Excellent
Vaccine Safety Commission - Excellent resource
Vaccine Liberation - Excellent
Alliance for Human Research Protection - Excellent
Sharyl Attkisson - Medical Vaccine Links
Dr. Mercola - Writes about general health and also vaccines

I use Web of Trust to protect my searches from malicious or unsafe sites.  I shouldn't have been surprised that several of the above sites were listed as "Unsafe," when, in fact, they are not only safe but truthful and informative.  No doubt the pro-vaxx people don't want you going to sites like these.

In addition to the above, there are many doctors, scientists, immunologists, etc., that I did not list because the list would become too long, plus by going to the links above, you will discover many of them.

My vaccine links through the end of 2016 - Hundreds of links.  I have since added hundreds more which at some point I'll be compiling into another blog post.


ADDENDUM - I have read that 60% of people are against MANDATORY vaccines.  This is only my suggestion, but since it's almost impossible to convince some of the dangers of vaccines, I think it might be easier to talk about the loss of their freedom.  And to tell them that once vaccines become mandatory for children, they will be next.  Followed by mandatory psych drugs for who knows how many people.  I think it is imperative to ask all your friends and relatives to contact their state and federal representatives in Congress and start demanding no mandatory vaccines.

The following is from "Stop Mandatory Vaccinations" which is listed above:

This is what is happening in California:
***ACTION ALERT!!!*** Sen Pan Announces New Bill To Effectively End Medical Exemptions in California. TAKE ACTION!

#CALIFORNIA update regarding #SB276 - http://bit.ly/CA-SB276

California, the time is now! Senator Pan has introduced the bill we have all been expecting. SB276, a bill to restrict medical exemptions in California, has gone live and Assemblything Lorena G is the first coauthor.

What the bill does:

1. All medical exemptions must be approved by the State Public Health Officer (or approved designee).

2. All medical exemptions must be based on CDC contraindications only. These are VERY narrow - basically anaphylaxis.

3. All medical exemption requests must be submitted on a standardized form created by the California Dept of Public Health (CDPH).

4. All medical exemption requests will be tracked in a database managed by the CDPH. This will include personal and sensitive medical information about your children.

5. Any medical exemption written PRIOR to SB276 will also need to be approved by the CDPH and included in their database, by July 1, 2020. If the grandfathered medical exemption is deemed "fraudulent," it will be invalidated.

We are going to be under the gun on this one due to legislative deadlines, it has the potential to move fast. We must take action en masse. We must show up en masse. Pan has declared war on our families. He has declared war on doctors. He has declared war on the legislators who, in good faith, passed SB277 knowing that medical exemptions would be broad and include family history and be written with YOUR doctor's discretion. Not Pan's discretion. Not the CDC's discretion.

Do these things today:
1. Call the Senate Rules Committee (916) 651-4120 and politely ask that SB276 is double referred to the Senate Health Committee and the Senate Business, Professions and Economic Development Committee.

2. Call the following Senators (we will be calling several a day so that we can hit them all fairly quickly). Urge them to NOT coauthor SB276 and to vote NO when/if comes before them for a vote.

Senator Toni Atkins (916) 651-4039 Senator Scott Wilk (916) 651-4021 Senator Pat Bates (916) 651-4036 Senator Bill Monning (916) 651-4017 Senator Richard Roth (916) 651-4031 Senator Maria Durazo (916) 651-4024 Senator Connie Leyva (916) 651-4020 Sen Shannon Grove (916) 651-4016

Sample Script: "Hi, I'm calling to urge Senator __________ to NOT coauthor SB276, a bill to severely restrict medical exemptions. Furthermore, I would ask that the Senator vote NO should SB276 come before him/her for a vote. SB277 was passed because of a broad medical exemption that was left to a doctor's discretion. There is no crisis demanding such an authoritarian law in California. Thank you for your time."

3. You have two legislators - a Senator and an Assemblyperson. Call them both. Ask for a meeting with the legislator (not a staffer) in the next few weeks in their district office to discuss SB276. Ask if they have any town halls or coffee talks on the calendar in the near future. Let us know what you find out!

4. Start talking to people: friends, family, doctors, nurses. Let them know what Pan is up to with this bill. Invite them to join Parents United 4 Kids.

The Greater Good, Censorship, Medical Ethics, and More

A safety study of vaccines has never been done.  To do a safety study a group of vaccinated children would have to be compared to a true inert placebo group.  Instead of an inert placebo, they use a toxic mix of adjuvants (poisons) or another vaccine.  Then when they get the same results in both groups (they know they will), they say, "see, it wasn't the vaccine, vaccines are safe."  Actually, by doing these fraudulent studies they are basically admitting vaccines are NOT SAFE.  Otherwise, they'd be tripping over themselves to do true safety studies.  This should be obvious to the meanest intelligence.  They say vaccines need to be made mandatory for the greater good and that they can't do those safety studies because it would be unethical to deprive the placebo group of these vaccines.  That's their reasoning.  I couldn't make this stuff up.  Vaccines, as they are now, kill and permanently injure people, so how can it be ethical to knowingly vaccinate them with something that can kill and injure them?  Wouldn't it be for the greater good to do safety studies to improve vaccines, even if it meant depriving some people of something that might protect them?  Or perhaps kill and injure them?  And guess what - there are around a million children who don't want vaccines.  Any of them could be used as placeboes so they don't even have to think about any ethical implications because there wouldn't be any.  Yet they continue with this argument.

There has been censorship in the media for quite a while.  When was the last time in the media when you heard of someone dying or suffering as a result of a vaccine?  Probably never.  But on the evening news tonight, they reported a person who died from the flu along with having a strep infection.  So they said to get your flu shot.  Now the censorship is starting online.  Just yesterday, Pinterest started blocking all searches for vaccines due to what they call "misinformation" being posted.  Anything that paints vaccines in a negative way that is based on facts is called misinformation.  On the other hand, anything pro-vaccination, even when based on lies and fraud is fine.  Probably the biggest lie is that vaccines are safe.  Imagine if your cars were treated like vaccines - no liability, no safety testing, and you had to buy whichever one they mandated.  They just tell you they are safe, and no accidents are ever reported.  Who would put up with this?  Imagine if all products were like this.

What about autism and the latest on the vaccine-autism link?  Pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman originally served as the expert medical witness for the government, which defends vaccines in federal vaccine court.  He had testified that vaccines do not cause autism in specific patients.  Dr. Zimmerman now has signed a bombshell sworn affidavit. He said that, during a group of 5,000 vaccine-autism cases being heard in court on June 15, 2007, he took aside the Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers he worked for defending vaccines and told them he’d discovered “exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism.”  Here's the article:  How a pro-vaccine doctor reopened debate about link to autism.  Again, I can't make this stuff up.  Next, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, M.D., the worlds leading authority of vaccines, being interviewed under oath by the IOM (Institute of Medicine) (go to minute 46:40 - 53:00 of this Highwire link - or you can watch the whole episode, which is worth the watch):  Highwire, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, under oath.  Stanley Plotkin admitted he doesn't know if vaccines cause autism, so he just decides to assume they don't.  He said that, not me.  What happened to the precautionary principle, which has four central components: taking preventive action in the face of uncertainty; shifting the burden of proof to the proponents of an activity; exploring a wide range of alternatives to possibly harmful actions; and increasing public participation in decision making.

All of the above are facts.  And all of the above is what they want to censor, calling it misinformation, even when straight out of the mouths of the leading experts.  Knowing the above, do you want mandatory vaccines?  It's all based on lies - vaccines are not safe, there have never been any safety studies comparing vaccinated against a true placebo, most people don't know about VAERS or VICP, vaccines contain numerous toxins and neurotoxins that they tell you are safe, again with no testing, and on and on.  The vaccine program is an experiment and it sounds just like something that might have come out of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.  But it's here, in the U.S., now - in 2019.  Censorship, human rights violations, human experimentation without informed consent.  NEVER AGAIN, at least not until the next time.  I hope people wake-up soon or it will be EVER AGAIN.

How to Stay Healthy - Health Care vs Sick Care

A few days ago a friend of mine posted on Facebook a video about Finland's health system and how everyone is covered and compared that to the U.S. system.  I mentioned that the best way to solve our sick care system is for people to get healthy via a healthy whole foods organic diet, proper supplements, exercise, good sleep, lowering stress levels, etc.  Then I mentioned how it had helped me stay healthy - no viral/bacterial infections.

One would think nothing wrong with that solution, right?  After all, I grew up getting sick almost all the time with colds, flu, headaches, allergies, indigestion, an ulcer, etc.  You would think someone might ask what I did?  Well, not on FB.  Not only did that not happen, but someone attacked my healthy lifestyle, saying it was just by luck and it would catch up with me like it did with  Jim Fixx (as if one case can be generalized to the whole population).  In response, I mentioned that the president of the American Heart Association had gotten a heart attack at age 52 (to make the point that anyone can have a problem at any time).  She didn't respond to that.

She then called supplements snake oil (not knowing that actual snake oil is good for you, not so much for the snake who donated it) and because I said I had owned a vitamin health food store, she said I had been selling snake oil (we didn't - wouldn't have been fair to the snakes).  I mentioned that in addition to my own excellent health that I had done hundreds (actually thousands) of hours of research on health and supplements.  She then said doctors have done millions of hours of research (a million hours equals 114 years which shows how ridiculous her statements were).  I think you can see where this was going.  (NOTE: Shortly after I wrote this post, I encountered another person who said getting healthy from organic foods and supplements was a myth (he was mythtaken, of course)!  I'm wondering if he was the same person using another name.  One would think that common sense and logic would tell you that eating foods with pesticides/herbicides and chemicals would not be healthy compared to foods without those.  It astounds me that when you tell people this, they still don't understand it).

I answered that with a chart of statistics regarding our health (sick) care system results from all those millions of hours.  Plus I was going to add that of all developed nations, the U.S. is 31st in longevity and has the highest infant mortality rates, not to mention we spend more than any nation on this so-called health care.  This is the chart:

I was going to mention that not one person has died from supplements when taken in the proper amounts or as directed by a healthcare practitioner (what she called snake oil) in the past several years, if ever (in a few cases in the past, when a person was in poor health and taking drugs and supplements and died, they blamed the supplement, of course).  

I had said nothing negative about her and in fact, before her negative comments, had put a "like" on one of her comments.  After reviewing the things she said and realizing her nasty negativity and ignorance regarding health and being human, I blocked her on FB (I average one of those per year).  I don't mind if someone disagrees with me but when they resort to personal attacks (for helping others and then accuses me of having sold snake oil) without having done the research...  And I certainly don't want someone who makes statements that promote sickness.  She obviously had not done any research but thought she knew it all.  People like that can be dangerous to your health.

This leads me to one of my favorite quotes:  "It astounds me how people never learn, and simply accept what is suggested to them by those writing articles, or those speaking on television, as gospel. Have we lost the ability to think critically? Have we lost the ability to question what we are told based upon actual facts? Or have we simply adopted the "Foghorn Leghorn perspective:  "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind.""

In the above quote, the answer for her was yes, yes, and yes.  Perhaps she worked in the medical field or maybe she was just brain damaged from vaccines or was suffering the side effects of prescription drugs.

Unfortunately, the current system in the U.S. is a money machine.  Vaccines have no liability, the U.S. is one of only two countries to allow prescription drugs to be advertised in the media.  Vaccines and drugs have side effects up to and including death, plus lifelong injuries.  Eating junk food has that effect, too.  If they actually wanted to change the sick care system into a health care system, they would promote a healthy lifestyle.  They would have courses in school promoting nutrition, exercise, and why supplements are needed in today's world.  They would discontinue vaccines until they are made safe (they are far from that now).  They won't because the last thing they want to do is destroy a trillion dollar industry.  But that doesn't mean that you can't do it yourself.  How do you get started? 

Similar to what I did - find the healthiest person you can, ask him or her what he or she does to stay healthy.  The person I found told me to get a book called "Health Secrets of the Hunza" and follow their diet.  I did.  The next step is to do some research from Independent Sources - I wish I had the internet when I started on this health quest - it would have been a lot easier.  Oh - don't expect overnight success.  It took me around 20 years to get to the point I'm at today, but for some problems to fade away, it took as little as 6 months.  This won't fix the system as there are too many people like the woman above who would probably rather die than change, but if you would like to opt out of the sick care system and into a health care system, I can vouch that this worked wonders for me (and many thousands of others) and perhaps it will for you.  The nice thing is there are no side effects to eating healthy organic foods and next to zero side effects from taking supplements in the proper amounts and as directed on the labels.

What if you're on prescription drugs?  Seek a good naturopathic doctor (or another medical professional (M.D., D.O., etc.) who understands nutrition.  

How to Get The Truth Out About Vaccines

******** Special Bulletin:  Starting September 12, 2018, a FREE showing of The Truth About Vaccines will be available to watch.  That link is where you can sign up to watch it.  For those who believe vaccines are safe and effective, this is a must watch. ************

I'm sure by now that many who are reading this will have told someone about the dangers of vaccines only to be called an anti-vaxxer, quack, conspiracy theorist, etc.  In short, they won't listen or believe you if you attack the safety of vaccines.  Let's face it - you are being out-spent and most doctors, all the mainstream media, and big pharma are better at convincing people of the "safety" of vaccines, even though vaccines are not close to being safe.  And Google and other search engines list pages that are either pro-vaccine or that discredit so-called anti-vaxxers (those who are for safe vaccines) at the top of their lists (plus every time you click a link you are being tracked).  This is why I am now doing most of my searches on DuckDuckGo - funny name, but they don't track you and the order of their lists is more balanced.  Another instance of the new norm - Fake News.  So the question is, "how do you overcome the lies and get people to see and/or find the truth?  I believe the only way is to get them to discover it on their own.  They have to educate themselves.  If you can think of better ideas, please let me and your friends know.

Ask them to look up the word "safe."  Then send them to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) or they can check what I found under the Logic and Common Sense section below.  Then ask them how they can believe vaccines are safe.

So instead of lecturing them, give them references they can check.  Here are some links to get them started (the first two have been practicing medicine for over 30 years each):

1.  Dr. Franz, MD - Pediatrician from Orlando, FL. - 23-minute video interview.

2.  Dr. Toni Bark, MD - Pediatrician, Ilinois - 11-minute video plus article about her experience.

3.  Dr. Stephanie Seneff, PhD, Research Scientist at MIT.  Great article with a list of 17 links to 17 MDs including the two above.

4.  Dr. Kelly Brogan, MD - This article may help you understand why your friends or family are resistant to hear your message about the dangers of vaccines.

5.  Dr. Judy Mikovits, PhD is a Biochemist, cellular and molecular biologist with over 30 years of scientific expertise. She has directed programs on HIV, cancer, epigenetics, and neuroimmune disease, with a focus on the development of novel drug and diagnostic technologies. Dr. Mikovits holds a Ph.D. in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from George Washington University. Her dissertation was on HIV latency and mechanisms of immune activation in monocytes. Dr. Mikovits was a Postdoctoral Scholar in Molecular Virology at the Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, National Cancer Institute under Dr. David Derse.  In other words, impeccable credentials.  Over the past 26 years, she has published 51 scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals and worked as a government scientist for many years developing viruses and vaccinations. In 2011 when she made a horrifying discovery that was contaminating all vaccinations, she presented her data to government officials and was threatened & told to destroy all her data. When she did not she was jailed, her career systematically destroyed, and a gag order put in place for 4 years threatening that if she spoke out she would be thrown back in jail. That gag order has just lifted, and she’s dumped the government right in it! She speaks about how autism is associated with vaccines, also cancers, chronic fatigue syndrome, Alzheimer's, autoimmune diseases, allergies and more. She discusses how the cocktail of vaccinations pumped into babies mutate to develop months and years down the track into new viruses, cancers, and diseases, some they don't even know about yet. She explains how the viruses injected through vaccines tear open our DNA and insert their own DNA to mutate our genetic makeup and be passed on generation after generation. She has been threatened with a suicide-murder cover up, she doesn’t care, she wants it all exposed. The act of the Australian government making vaccinations mandatory is an act of genocide. If your jaw didn’t drop you obviously need to listen to it again.

6.  Dr. Suzanne Humphries, M.D. - One of the best if you really want to learn about vaccines.

Next time you try to talk to someone about vaccines, refer them to one or more of the above (#6 is especially good) or go back to my last few posts where I supplied well over 150 links.  Whichever you think might resonate with the person you are trying to get educated, whether it's your doctor, family member, or friend.

You could also show them this:  Dr. Marcia Angell, editor of The New England Journal of Medicine for 20 years, has written:  "It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." (NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, "Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption").

If you can, use logic and common sense on them - the below section isn't all there is to common sense and logic, but maybe it will get them to at least do some thinking:
This is a little long, but some things to think about:  LOGIC. COMMON SENSE, and STATISTICS: U.S. Supreme Court said vaccines are "UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE."  Why do drug companies have no vaccine liability?  Those who want mandatory vaccines say that if people stop vaccinating, all those diseases will come back worse than ever - well, by age 28, all the childhood vaccines have worn off, and less than half of adults get vaccinated, so where are all the epidemics (pandemics?) and why aren't all the adults dropping dead like flies from all those diseases?  This also rules out any chance of reaching so-called "herd immunity" or "community immunity."  If vaccines are effective, why are most outbreaks happening in vaccinated populations (especially in China where 99.5% of the population is vaccinated, and they are having outbreaks)?  Why would anyone care if someone's child wasn't vaccinated if yours was, as yours would be immune to all those vaccine-preventable diseases if vaccines were effective?  If they are safe, why have there been over 60,000 deaths (perhaps much higher) in VAERS (where less than 1 in 10 actually gets reported according to CDC, maybe as little as 1 in 100 - I've multiplied by just a factor of 10), E.R. visits - over 2 million, Hospitalized - over 600,000, Life-Threatening - over 110,000, and Disabled - over 82,000.  These numbers are for the years 2000 - 2015! (http://tonybelmontphotography.blogspot.com/2016/01/vaccinations-forget-everything-else-for.html)  Here's a chart from the CDC for 2014 Pertussis cases
(https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/downloads/pertuss-surv-report-2014.pdf) - notice in the lower right chart that over 5x as many cases reported in those who got the 3+ recommended vaccines compared to those who did not get the vaccine.  The above does not take into account the possible long-term side effects which are unknown as there are no studies available for this.  Did you know that to save one person from getting meningitis, the meningococcal vaccine will have killed three people and injured much more?  More people die and are injured by vaccines than from the diseases they are supposed to prevent (according to statistics from VAERS and CDC). If you look at graphs of diseases from the 1800s to the present, and where vaccines came in, you'll see that most deaths from these diseases were almost already gone when the vaccines arrived.  Check the graph for scarlet fever - there was no vaccine, so you can't give vaccines credit for that.  Why aren't people still getting it?  Why do many, if not most, doctors not vaccinate?  And finally, why have there been almost no comparison studies in the U.S. between vaccinated and unvaccinated people (there were a couple in Europe showing vaccinated children less healthy than unvaccinated)?  I know, that last question is a tough one, but if you actually spend some time on it, you'll figure it out (and no, they wouldn't be sacrificing the unvaccinated because there are around a million children who do not get vaccinated).  If those who want vaccines would actually do some research, fact checking, use some common sense and logic, perhaps they would find the truth.  Instead, they accuse those who actually have done the research of not doing research and those who want safe vaccines are called anti-vaxx.  I wonder if they call those who want safe highways, anti-highway.  I wonder if they call the U.S. Supreme Court anti-vaxx for calling vaccines unavoidably unsafe.  No doubt they would call you that if you said what SCOTUS said.  I know all this won't change the opinions of those who want everyone vaccinated as they seem incapable of logic and common sense or of doing research from independent sources.  Then again, perhaps they are profiting from vaccines.  Finally, the last question - what is the motivation for the pro-vaxxer$ vs the safe-vaxxers (the ones they call anti-vaxxers)?

"It astounds me how people never learn, and simply accept what is suggested to them by those writing articles, or those speaking on television, as gospel. Have we lost the ability to think critically? Have we lost the ability to question what we are told based upon actual facts? Or have we simply adopted the "Foghorn Leghorn perspective:  "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind.""

This is in answer to those who say the adjuvants and contaminants in vaccines are too small to do harm:  In 2016, the EPA published a voluntary health advisory for PFOA and PFOS, warning that exposure to the chemicals at levels above 70 parts per trillion, total, could be dangerous. One part per TRILLION is roughly the equivalent of a single grain of sand in an Olympic-sized swimming pool.  The updated HHS assessment was poised to find that exposure to the chemicals at less than one-sixth of that level could be dangerous for sensitive populations like infants and breastfeeding mothers.  So when you hear the argument that some of the adjuvants in vaccines are too little to do anything, and are usually in parts per BILLION, think again.

The Short Version

Ingredients in Vaccines:  Mercury, Aluminum (spelled Aluminium in Europe), egg protein, Formaldehyde, MSG, squalene, glyphosate (the stuff in Roundup), gelatin, Polysorbate 80, aborted human fetal tissue, viruses and retroviruses, glutaraldehyde, sodium borate, L-histidine, lactose, bovine-derived material, Neomycin, mannitol, sorbitol, 2-phenoxyethanol, phenol, borax, monkey (kidney), cow (heart), calf (serum), chicken (embryo and egg), duck (egg), pig (blood), sheep (blood), dog (kidney), horse (blood), rabbit (brain), guinea pig, large foreign proteins, latex, bacteria and their toxins, mycoplasma, GMO yeast, foreign DNA, etc.  Plus contaminants, including lead.

To see more about the above ingredients, go to this Link.  The amount of aluminum alone should be a cause for concern.  The effects are a lot worse when mixed with lead and mercury.  I have seen some ridiculous articles comparing the above ingredients with the constituents of bananas and blueberries.  First, you're not injecting them (I hope), and second, if your fruit contains the above ingredients, you better find a new supplier.

I'm not even sure the best way to approach the side effects listed (from VAERS plus the package insert that comes with the vaccine) as many of them are unknown because there are no studies of multiple vaccines given at once and no long-term studies, so no doubt this list will not be all of the possible or probable side effects but here are some of them:

Brain Inflammation/Acute Encephalopathy
Chronic Nervous System Dysfunction
Anaphylaxis
Febrile Seizures
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Brachial Neuritis;
Acute and Chronic Arthritis
Thrombocytopenia
Smallpox, polio, measles and varicella zoster vaccine strain infection
Death
Shock and “unusual shock-like state”
Protracted, inconsolable crying
Syncope
Deltoid Bursitis
asthma
atopy
allergy
autoimmunity
autism
learning disorders
communication disorders
developmental disorders
intellectual disability
attention deficit disorder
disruptive behavior disorder
tics and Tourette’s syndrome
seizures
febrile seizures
epilepsy
pronounced swelling redness, heat or hardness at injection site that continues for days or weeks
body rash or hives
shock/collapse
unresponsiveness, prolonged deep sleep;
high pitched screaming (may include arching of back)
hours of persistent, inconsolable crying
high fever (over 103 F)
respiratory distress (difficulty breathing)
twitching or jerking of the body, arm, leg or head
rolling or crossing of eyes
severe head or neck pain
joint pain or muscle weakness
disabling fatigue
loss of memory and mental skills
paralysis of any part of body
changes in sleep/wake pattern and dramatic personality changes
lack of eye contact or social withdrawal
loss of ability to roll over, sit up or stand up
head banging or unusual flapping, rubbing, rocking, spinning
onset of chronic ear or respiratory problems (including asthma)
severe/persistent diarrhea or chronic constipation
excessive bruising, bleeding or anemia
other serious loss of physical, mental or emotional wellness

The above list comes from NVIC, VAERS, vaccine inserts, etc.  There are a list of 49 references on the NVIC site.

Now that you know about the above, does it make sense to get vaccinated under the current conditions?  Or will you believe those who push (aka - profit from) vaccines and tell you how good they are for you?  Or how safe they are for you?  They will tell you only 1 out of a million will get side effects.  Go to VAERS like I did.  This is what I found:  there have been over 60,000 deaths (perhaps much higher) in VAERS (where less than 1 in 10 actually gets reported according to CDC, maybe as little as 1 in 100 - I've multiplied by just a factor of 10), E.R. visits - over 2 million, Hospitalized - over 600,000, Life-Threatening - over 110,000, and Disabled - over 82,000.  These numbers are for the years 2000 - 2015! When you do the math, it's 1 out of 100 that suffer side effects.  Then again, if only 1% gets reported to VAERS (instead of 10%), then it's 1 out of every 10 people who will get a side effect (including death).  And they don't even know the long-term side effects!

So, without doing any hardcore investigations, without looking at all the corrupt studies done by the vaccine companies, without even using logic and commons sense, these numbers should scare the hell out of you.  Possible long-term side effects include cancer, Alzheimers, dementia, Parkinson's, diabetes, etc.

Keep in mind that one comparative study that I just discovered showed that there was a 5X greater mortality rate in vaccinated vs unvaccinated.  Vaccinate under these current conditions?  Go ahead if it makes you happy, just don't push or force others to get these toxic injections.

Distracted Driving vs Vaccines, Mortality, and the Media

The other night on the evening news they had about a 3-4 minute segment on distracted driving and stated that it kills around 9 people every day.  What they never talk about is how many people are killed by vaccines every day - at least four times as many, perhaps as high as 40 times as many.  Not a single negative story ever about vaccines.  Why?  Most of their revenue comes from those same drug companies in the form of all those drug ads you see.  The point is that distracted driving is bad but vaccines are worse.

Vaccines injure a lot more than they kill.  As the number of vaccines goes up, the problems go up.  By checking official statistics and comparing the outcomes, this becomes obvious.

Here is a link to WHO where you can click on any country to see their vaccine schedule (as well as a lot of other information) - Country Vaccine Schedules.  Just double-click on the country name.

Here is a LINK to a PDF file showing the number of vaccines given by country and comparing their mortality rates (the U.S. gives the most vaccines and has the highest mortality rates for children under 5 years old) as well as ranks for mortality rates; plus autism rates comparing 9 countries (the U.S. had the most in 2006 at 1 in 150 - it's now about 1 in 50).   This report is from 2006 - the number of vaccines has since gone up and will no doubt continue going up in line with the rates of autism.

And here is a link to the U.S. vaccine schedule from birth to 18 years old:  Vaccine Schedule.

Here are the results from a study I just found:  "DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.

It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections."

No studies have been done on any other vaccines looking to see if this problem is widespread.  There have been studies that show if you get the flu vaccine every year, you increase your chances of contracting other upper respiratory infections.

Don't forget that this is in addition to the deaths and injuries directly resulting from the vaccine itself. 

The above links are all from easy to find resources online.  As you may know, there are almost no comparison studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals (aside from the link above).  However, by checking the above links, it can be seen that the fewer vaccines that are given, the lower the mortality rate and the lower the autism rates.  The facts are already in existence and you can easily compare the outcomes.

But wait, there's more - if you still believe that vaccines don't cause autism and that the science is settled, you need to read This!  It's about the study that supposedly showed vaccines don't cause autism.  The chart in that link also lists most of the ingredients that are injected with the vaccines.  It doesn't show the contaminants.  All of the above leads to one conclusion - Vaccines do cause autism, brain damage, autoimmune disorders, death, and this list goes on and on.  The evidence is overwhelming.  You'll never see it in the mainstream media (MSM).

Paraphrased from the Terminator - Kyle Reese:

 "Listen, and understand. The vaccinator is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are vaccinated."  Vaccines and those who make them are Terminators for thousands of children.  Everyone needs to be Kyle Reese and fight back because the vaccinators will not stop.

Vaccines, Fake News, and Snopes

A friend of mine commented about truth and the news (truth in the news would be a great concept!) and mentioned Snopes as a place to check facts.  I mentioned I would never trust Snopes as they have given misinformation about vaccines.  As soon as I mentioned that, someone said, "oh, so you're anti-vaccine."

I said no, I am pro-choice, pro-freedom, anti unsafe vaccines, anti (against) human experimentation (no long-term studies have ever been done on vaccines and no studies have ever been done on multiple vaccines given at the same time, so if you get vaccinated, you are being experimented on).  Then a few people and I went back and forth about research.  I told one of them to Google VAERS and CDC to see that vaccines kill more people than the diseases they are supposed to prevent.  He replied:

"Nope. Don’t tell me to google or go someplace to research. You made the claim, show me the evidence. The burden is on he who makes the claim. You can’t rest on a generic tome about critical thinking hoping that inference that I don’t employ it sticks. It doesn’t.  Where’s your evidence that vaccines kill more people that they prevent getting diseases?"

Since it is your health that you should be concerned with, it should be up to you to do all you can to keep your health, and that would include doing your own research, much as I have done.  If you don't want to, that's okay with me, but don't expect me to do it for you.

He found VAERS as well as the CDC's disclaimer that the reports are not proven associations (you could say the same about vaccines by the same reasoning - that they are not proven to prevent disease. - the old "correlation does not equal causation."  They only use that one when it's in their favor.  I told him the CDC buys and sells $4 billion a year in vaccines, so of course, they'll put a disclaimer in there.  Why would they even have VAERS if the reports to it weren't reliable?  I should have added that the vaccine court (NVIC) has paid out over $4 billion for injuries including death.  He probably would have said those injuries weren't proven, too.  As I always say, use common sense and logic when investigating things.  Unfortunately, only  1-10% of adverse events even get reported to VAERS.  It was becoming obvious that he had done no research on vaccines and was probably relying on the fake news media (including Snopes since this is what started this exchange).

Next, this comment came out of the blue (there had been no prior mention of "herd immunity);" where did this remark come from?  "For someone who extols research and critical thinking about vaccines he’s clearly never heard of herd immunity.  Anyway.  Claims require proof and extreme claims require extreme proof. Or we are free to ignore your claim."

Of course, he is free to ignore whatever claim anyone makes.  However, it would be wise to investigate the claim since it may well affect his health and well being.  But that is totally up to him.
I posted two links for him about the myth of herd immunity and why it can't possibly work.  Here is one of those:  Herd Immunity.  Just knowing that vaccine protection, when it works, lasts only from 2 - 10 years is enough to tell you most of the adult population in the U.S. is no longer protected from vaccine diseases, thus no "herd immunity."

In his next comment below, he missed the point - Using measles as an example - No One is dying from measles even though less than half the population has any vaccine protection.  Vaccines have absolutely nothing to do with any of the unvaccinated not dying, or even getting the disease.

Next, this comment:"His pitch (referring to me as if I was pitching something, which I wasn't - I was trying to introduce them to some factual research and get them to do some research) seems to be that in raw numbers vaccine deaths outnumber disease deaths.  Then another one said, "He's ignoring the overwhelming number of people prevented from dying, as Charlie points out."

So I told him vaccines were not responsible for the decrease in deaths from all those diseases and to look at graphs of those diseases from the late 1800s or so to the present and check when the vaccines were introduced.  I also mentioned that Scarlet Fever had no vaccine and followed the same slope down in the graph.  And attached this graph to make it easy for them to follow things:

It's sad that people don't check actual facts and instead rely on what they hear in the media or from those who profit from vaccines.  What those who promote vaccines do it pick specific years for their charts so it appears vaccines made a huge difference, usually a few years before the vaccine came out and after a spike up in cases.

Next, I added the below link to another article about the myth of herd immunity (the link has lots of other information so they could start on their own research. It is part of a 12 part series with links to each of the 12 parts at the bottom of the page. It has links to studies supporting what they say.  Of course, anyone is always free to check on what they say (as I did when I began my research.  Enjoy!  Herd Immunity and More.  To this information, the FB guys said the following (unbelievable, I know - it showed me they had no interest in doing the research or of learning the truth):

The first guy said this about the link:  "but it's got 12 parts! It has to be authoritative. 12, not 11!" (nothing like a little sarcasm instead of actually doing some research).  Then the other guy said, "I think I'll choose to believe history, science and the experts over ad hoc conspiracy."  Considering he chose not to learn these things or research history, science and the experts, he illustrates the last line from my favorite quote - "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind."
And one of his final comments:  "Sorry, but I find discussions with conspiracy theorists a pointless waste of my time. Have a nice day."

That is what people who don't do the research say.  They will put labels on those who did the research calling them conspiracy theorists, anti-vaxxers, quacks, etc., probably in an attempt to hide their ignorance and lack of research or knowledge regarding vaccines.  Then one of them said (now this is funny, or perhaps sad because I had shown him lots of facts), "I can see why you hate facts about vaccines, then."

It's pathetic that those who don't do the research and refuse to read links provided in order to learn something meaningful.  I finished with the following.

Not facts (referring to what he said about "facts") if you do the actual research. from INDEPENDENT SOURCES including doctors, scientists, immunologists, virologists, etc.  And I supplied the links from my last post (I'm guessing around 200 of them, although I doubt they'll check any.  Then said I was done commenting on that thread, and bye bye.  There was no point to continue.

It seems some people can't handle the truth, are brainwashed by the media, are making a profit from vaccines, don't want to take the time to learn the truth, or ?  Maybe someone else will find some of the links useful and the pro-choice pro-freedom people (isn't that what the U.S. is supposed to be?) will gain another knowledgeable person.  If someone learns the dangers of vaccines and it saves even one person, it will have been worth it.

If some of you wonder why I bother with this - seeing and reading about the countless lives destroyed or ended (mostly children) because of vaccines, and all the lies told, I can't sit by and do nothing.  The past 30 years I have spent my life helping others with their health.  As long as I can I will continue to share what I have learned through research and share that knowledge.  Some people, like those above, will doubtfully ever change for whatever reason.  Or perhaps they will when a catastrophic vaccine reaction happens to them or someone they know.  That's sad.  With all the above said, I don't want anyone to listen to me - I want everyone to do the research from (and this is IMPORTANT!!!) Independent Sources as I have done.

So far, I've only researched vaccines related to people.  Many years ago when I was growing up, I had dogs as did many of the people   I knew.  None of the dogs ever got cancer.  Now I know of several dogs with, or that have died from, cancer.  I started wondering why.  Unlike they do with autism, they can't say that they never noticed it before (which isn't true about autism either).  What changed is that they are now giving dogs a lot more vaccines.  If you're a dog owner, please do yourself a favor and read this article.  It may save you money and save your dog, too.  I'm wondering - if the vaccines are the cause of the dogs cancers, what's going to happen to all the people who have had their 70+ vaccines as they grow older?  Remember, you can't unvaccinate.

In an upcoming blog, I'll be sharing some more links about vaccines and autism rates and mortality, comparing the number of vaccines in several countries and their outcomes.