Search This Blog

Friday, July 31, 2020

Now That I've Gotten Your Attention



At least I hope I have.  Information here may save your life or the life of someone you know.  I don't know if you are aware of the censorship taking place on the internet, especially social media sites and you tube, and also in the mainstream media.  Not to mention the misinformation on this subject from the CDC, FDA, and again, the meida.   If any post contains information that might be helpful for people to survive and recover from Covid-19 it is being censored.  That includes vitamins and supplements.  From what I have read and researched, over half the lives lost to Covid could have been saved.  So what I will do here is supply links to helpful information.  Hopefully, it will be the start of a journey where you can learn the truth because you certainly won't learn it from the CDC, Fauci, Gates, the media, etc.  (NOTE:  I will be adding to these links over time, so bookmark this page and check back from time to time.)


Frontline Doctors Transcript - Here is the transcript of the Frontline doctors press conference that was given steps away from the U.S. Supreme Court which has been heavily censored after being viewed by over 17.000,000 people in the first few hours.  


Perhaps this is the best link on the Frontline doctors, with short bios of each one.  Since they are all M.D.'s, you can easily verify their bios.  CENSORSHIP: CDC Takes Over Frontline Doctors’ Website and Replaces Content with Their Own Data - It's amazing how the media are attacking these hero doctors.  It should be criminal.


Saturday, July 18, 2020

COVID-19: How can I cure thee? Let me count the ways.

NOTE:  This article is from an email I received from Orthomolecular Medicine News Service.  I tried to link to the original article, but the website wouldn't load.  Don't know if too many people were trying to access it or perhaps someone was trying to censor it.  So made a copy of the email here.

Orthomolecular News omns@orthomolecular.org via s4.csa1.acemsd4.com
2:56 PM (7 hours ago)

This article may be reprinted free of charge provided 1) that there is clear attribution to the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, and 2) that both the OMNS free subscription link http://orthomolecular.org/subscribe.html and also the OMNS archive link http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/index.shtml are included.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, July 18, 2020

COVID-19
How can I cure thee? Let me count the ways.
Commentary by Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD
(OMNS July 18, 2020) Probably never before in history has anything or any event mixed fact, fiction, fear, and confusion like the COVID-19 pandemic of 2019-2020. Political and medical "experts" have been in abundance, primarily regurgitating the same message as though it was something new every time they get interviewed: wash your hands, maintain social distancing, and wear a mask as much as possible. And the public and the news media always take great comfort that an "expert" told them the truth. Trouble is, you can always find another "expert" of equal credentials who will offer a completely contradictory perspective. Understandably, this generates much of the fear and confusion noted above. The good hygiene and virus avoidance advice noted above is helpful, although it is probably a bit overblown when discussing how important a mask is in preventing virus transmission, especially outdoors. It seems ludicrous to mandate mask wearing at all times, indoors and outdoors, although this is being given consideration by some governmental (and medical) authorities at the time of this writing. However, this advice only scratches the surface with regard to the numerous options available to avoid contracting this infection, or to even cure it. There is no point in suffering from misguided advice when COVID-19 can be prevented or reliably cured in short order. As will be clearly explained in this article, nobody needs to die from COVID-19, or even to suffer needlessly (as many virus victims have remained quite ill for months before finally recovering).

While still unknown to most practitioners of traditional, or "modern" medicine, acute viral syndromes, COVID-19 included, can all be easily prevented most of the time. And when such viruses do get a foothold in the body, they are still easily eradicated if the patient is not too close to death before receiving any of a large number of treatments established to be effective. Many doctors get attacked for promoting treatments as cures for afflictions that are traditionally considered to be incurable. Certainly, it is true that some treatments promoted as being reliable cures are either fraudulent or of only nominal benefit. However, failing to assert the validity of a true cure for a medical condition is just as detrimental to the health of an ailing patient as it is promoting a false cure. Many doctors know of highly beneficial treatments that cure or vastly improve medical conditions that are little affected by traditional therapies. Yet, fear of license revocation for telling the truth about inexpensive and natural therapies that cannot be protected by patents keeps most health care practitioners from promoting those beneficial therapies. Nothing is ever embraced, and seemingly not even permitted, that would take away large profits from pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, and even many of the doctors themselves. Whenever you are absolutely stupefied and cannot figure out why a valuable treatment is not being used, just take the time to identify, expose, and analyze the money trail that is involved with the prescription drugs and/or overall treatment protocol that would be displaced. [1] The reason for the avoidance or suppression of that therapy will then become apparent.

To be perfectly clear: The health of the patient must always be the primary concern whenever rendering medical care.

There exists a first amendment right in the United States that permits free speech, including the writing of books and articles. This right has even protected authors that openly provide information on how to make bombs and promote terrorism. One can only hope that discussing inexpensive and effective medical treatments will continue to receive the same protection. However, it is very clear that this right is rapidly disappearing, in light of the open suppression of free speech that has been occurring for some time, but especially in the last few months. In light of this, then, the information in this article is being presented.

There already exist numerous ways to reliably prevent, mitigate, and even cure COVID-19, including in late-stage patients who are already ventilator-dependent. Some of the modalities have already been proven to work, although not in the classic "prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled trials" conducted on hundreds to thousands of patients. A perceptive clinician realizes that one overwhelmingly impressive case report where an agent or intervention promptly and unequivocally reverses the condition of a rapidly declining patient back to good health simply cannot be dismissed and disparaged as anecdotal and irrelevant. Furthermore, it is the existence of such cases and unequivocally positive responses that makes it completely unethical to put other patients into placebo-controlled trials when the treatment is dramatically beneficial to most patients and harmless to all. Allowing patients in the placebo group to suffer greatly and even die under such circumstances can never be justified.

Unfortunately, even when multiple scientifically-sound clinical studies actually do get conducted and reported on inexpensive, nontoxic, and highly effective therapies, those therapies rarely get utilized clinically. Although there are many examples of such therapies, an especially noteworthy example of the suppression of good medicine is seen with vitamin C. The continued avoidance of the use of intravenous vitamin C, especially in septic patients in the intensive unit, [2] stands out as a clear example of flagrant malpractice. Conservatively, thousands of ICU patients around the world, on a daily basis, would be saved or at least spared substantial suffering with a simple protocol utilizing intravenous vitamin C. And the morbidity and mortality of many different infections and toxin exposures outside of the ICU setting would also be readily mitigated and even resolved with vitamin C-based protocols. But this is not happening, even though the literature has unequivocally indicated the clinical importance (and safety) of vitamin C for over 80 years. [3]

The following therapies can be used, and many have been used, to prevent and treat COVID-19 (and many other infections, viral or otherwise). Not all of them have been equally well-documented or proven as being effective. Some have strong literature, research study, and clinical support. Others represent simply logical applications of treatment protocols that have already been proven to be highly effective in eradicating other viral infections and should be expected to have comparable effects on the COVID-19 virus. The treatments described below are categorized as having the ability to prevent, to improve and to cure COVID-19 and other viral syndromes.

Vitamin C (prevents, improves, cures)
Vitamin C has been documented to readily cure all acute viral syndromes in which it has been adequately dosed. As the ultimate virucide, vitamin C has been documented to inactivate/destroy every virus against which it was tested in vitro (in the test tube). Similarly, vitamin C has consistently resolved nearly all acute viral infections in patients treated with sufficient doses. [1,3] Vitamin C has cured Zika fever, another epidemic virus that struck in 2016. [4] Along with hydrogen peroxide, intravenous vitamin C has also been documented to be highly effective against the debilitating pain of Chikungunya virus. [5] Intravenous vitamin C has also resolved influenza. [6] A high degree of protection against infection by many other pathogens is also achievable with a variety of treatments featuring oral forms of vitamin C.

In an ongoing clinical study on hospitalized COVID-19 patients, a combination of vitamin C, methylprednisolone, heparin, and thiamine has already resulted in a dramatic decrease in hospital mortality rate. [7]

Vitamin D (prevents, improves)
Vitamin D has been clearly documented to strengthen immune function and decrease the risk of infection from any pathogen, including the COVID-19 virus. Patients with the highest vitamin D levels have shorter and less symptomatic courses of infection. While vitamin D has not been demonstrated to cure viruses as a monotherapy, maintaining an adequate level of vitamin D is vital for both preventing the contraction of infectious diseases as well as for recovering more rapidly from such infections, with a clear decrease in mortality rate. [8] In a recent study not yet published, Indonesian researchers studied the effects of vitamin D on mortality in 780 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. They found that nearly all (98.9%) of COVID-19 patients with vitamin D levels below 20 ng/ml died. Yet, less than 5% with substantially higher levels of vitamin D died. Consistent with these findings, it has been shown that the most life-threatening complication of COVID-19 infection, acute respiratory distress syndrome, occurs much more readily in the presence of a vitamin D deficiency. [9] Clearly, vitamin D supplementation should be part of any treatment protocol for COVID-19 or any other infectious disease.

Zinc (prevents, improves)
Zinc is needed inside the virus-infected cells to stop virus replication by inhibiting viral RNA polymerase. It is a possibility that many of the younger individuals that are either killed or made severely ill by COVID-19 are chronically zinc-depleted due to inadvertently zinc-deficient diets. Since supplemental zinc has only a limited ability to reach the cytoplasm of cells due to its ionic nature, zinc ionophores (agents that complex with zinc and transport it into the cell) are known to be good general antiviral agents. Quercetin is one such supplement, and it can serve as a good adjunctive agent to any COVID-19 treatment protocol. [10] Chloroquine, discussed below, is also a zinc ionophore, perhaps explaining its potent anti-COVID-19 effects.

Magnesium Chloride (prevents, improves, may cure)
Magnesium, especially as magnesium chloride, has been documented to have substantial antipathogen properties, and it has been reported to cure poliovirus infections as a monotherapy when ingested orally. [11] While it remains unclear what an aggressive regimen of this agent would do as a monotherapy for COVID-19, it can be expected to be a positive adjunctive agent in any COVID-19 prevention or treatment protocol.

Ozone (improves, cures)
Ozone is probably the single most potent antipathogen agent available today. It readily eradicates all pathogenic bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. It has many routes of administration and can be utilized as an effective monotherapy, although it positively supports all treatment protocols in an adjunctive and usually synergistic fashion as well. [12] Ozone has been documented to cure advanced cases of Ebola virus, for which there are still no known effective mainstream medical therapies. [13] For someone with ready access to ozone, different applications of ozone could certainly be used to prevent COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses as well. However, with the other simple and effective antiviral measures listed in this article, using ozone for prevention is not really needed.

Hydrogen Peroxide (prevents, improves, cures)
Hydrogen peroxide has been used for many years as a monotherapy as well as part of many different treatment protocols for a wide variety of infections. A clinically effective dose will typically cost less than a dime. During a severe epidemic of influenza in 1919 a protocol of intravenous hydrogen peroxide given only to the most severely ill patients dramatically decreased the death rate. [14]

Due to its well-documented and potent antipathogen properties, along with producing no toxic byproducts upon killing pathogens, hydrogen peroxide is now being proposed in the literature for an off-label use via oral and nasal washing, a regimen of gargling, and administration via nebulization immediately upon symptom appearance with the presumptive diagnosis of COVID-19. [15,16] Impressive anecdotal evidence already indicates that this application, especially via nebulization, appears to be a powerful preventive and even curative therapy against all respiratory-acquired infections, viral or otherwise.

In addition to nebulization with hydrogen peroxide, a large number of other agents can also be nebulized that have pathogen-killing and mucosal cell-healing properties, including, but not limited to: DMSO, magnesium chloride, sodium ascorbate [vitamin C], nascent iodine, sodium chloride, sodium bicarbonate, zinc chloride, glutathione, and N-acetyl cysteine.

Hyperbaric Oxygen (may improve, may cure)
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is the breathing of pure oxygen inside a chamber that is pressurized between 1.5 to 3 times normal atmospheric pressure. It has been documented to consistently help eradicate deep-seated and otherwise non-healing wounds and infections. [17] Ozone therapy, which has destroyed all viruses and pathogens against which it has been tested, has been shown to share some mechanisms of action with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. This certainly raises the reasonable possibility that hyperbaric oxygen might also be a very effective antiviral therapy in addition to its established antibacterial effects. [18]

Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation (improves, may cure)
Also known as photo-oxidation therapy, ultraviolet blood irradiation therapy has been effectively treating infections for many decades now. In a series of 36 cases of acute polio (spinal type), the blood irradiation treatment was successful in curing 100% of these patients. Viral hepatitis and bacterial sepsis were also found to be very effectively treated with ultraviolet blood irradiation. [19] This irradiation therapy would likely be equally effective against any other pathogens, especially viruses.

Chlorine Dioxide (improves, cures)
Chlorine dioxide has long been recognized as a powerful antimicrobial agent. It has been around for over 100 years, and it is used both to purify water and to purify blood to be used for transfusion. As a therapeutic agent for infectious diseases, it has been given both orally and intravenously with great effect, and it has been shown to be very effective against COVID-19 as well. [20,21] Dr. Andreas Kalcker directed a clinical study with doctors in Ecuador on COVID-19 patients using oral and intravenous chlorine dioxide. 97% of over 100 COVID-19 patients were vastly improved with clear remission of the severest symptoms after a four-day treatment regimen with chlorine dioxide. No deaths were reported. Oftentimes a dramatic clinical response was seen after only 24 hours. [22] A clinical study on the effects of oral chlorine dioxide on COVID-19 patients in Colombia was initiated in April of this year. [23]

Dexamethasone (improves)
Early findings in the Randomized Evaluation of COVid-19 thERapY (RECOVERY) Trial in the United Kingdom indicate that the addition of dexamethasone significantly improved clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients. A 35% reduction in death was seen in treated patients already dependent on mechanical ventilation, and a 20% reduction in death was seen in the treated patient group just receiving supplemental oxygen therapy. [24] This response of COVID-19 patients on ventilators is very consistent with the benefits of dexamethasone seen with acute respiratory distress syndrome unrelated to COVID-19. [25]

Budesonide (may prevent, improves, may cure)
Budesonide is a corticosteroid approved for inhalation via a nebulizer (Pulmicort Respules), and it is primarily used for persistent asthma and asthma exacerbations in children and infants as young as 12 months. [26,27] Dr. Richard Bartlett, a West Texas physician, has treated several dozen COVID-19 patients as of mid-June with nebulized budesonide, and he has asserted that all have promptly and dramatically responded positively and none have died. Sequential, or even combined, nebulizations of budesonide and hydrogen peroxide would appear to have great potential for a safe and rapidly effective treatment for any respiratory virus, including COVID-19. The hydrogen peroxide would serve to promptly kill the virus in the airways, and the corticosteroid would relieve the COVID-19 inflammation ("cytokine storm") and the associated shortness of breath. Nebulized budesonide has also been shown to be an effective treatment for preventing fungal infections of the nose and sinuses. [28]

Patients already on mechanical ventilation can also benefit greatly from the direct nebulization of therapeutic agents through the endotracheal tube. [29,30] This can certainly be done with budesonide [31] and hydrogen peroxide as well. Too many ventilator-dependent patients are left to eventually overcome the virus with whatever remaining immune capacity they have. Having a treatment that can directly attack the virus present in the lungs while relieving the inflammation with a resultant improvement in oxygenation should result in many of these patients getting weaned off the ventilators and eventually recovering completely. To date, being hospitalized with COVID-19 and eventually ending up on a ventilator still appears to be a death sentence for the vast majority of such patients.

Convalescent Plasma (improves, may cure)
Convalescent plasma is plasma collected from individuals who have recovered from an infectious disease resulting in the formation of antibodies. Depending on the severity of COVID-19 infection and the inherent immune capacity in a given patient, the transfusion of convalescent plasma from recovered COVID-19 patients has nearly always significantly reduced the viral load and clinically improved the patient. When the viral load is lowered dramatically, a clinical cure can be expected. A significantly improved survival rate has been seen in COVID-19 patients who have received convalescent plasma therapy. [32,33]

Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine (prevents, improves, cures)
I have had the opportunity to see clear-cut and dramatically positive clinical responses in six individuals with rapidly evolving symptoms consistent with fulminant COVID-19 infection treated with oral chloroquine phosphate. In these individuals (ranging from 35 to 65 years of age), therapy was initiated when breathing was very already very difficult and continuing to worsen. In all six, significant improvement in breathing was seen within about four hours after the first dose, with a complete clinical recovery seen after about an average of three days. The oldest individual had a pulse oximeter reading of 80 before the first dose of chloroquine, and the reading improved to 94 after about four hours as the labored breathing eased. The rapidity with which the shortness of breath evolved in all these individuals strongly suggested that respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome was imminent. The chloroquine dosing was continued for several days after complete clinical resolution to prevent any possible clinical relapse. While a large, definitive study on chloroquine and COVID-19 remains to be completed, there is already a great deal of published evidence supporting its effectiveness and overall safety. [34,35] Also, a recent clinical trial demonstrated that hydroxychloroquine given with azithromycin eradicated or significantly decreased measured viral load in respiratory swabs. [36]

Both chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are old drugs that are very safe at the doses shown to be effective in treating COVID-19, and they are both recognized as having significant nonspecific antiviral properties. Also, chloroquine, and probably hydroxychloroquine as well, are zinc ionophores, [37,38] which is likely the reason why they have such significant antiviral properties. As noted above in the discussion on zinc, agents that greatly facilitate zinc transport inside virus-infected cells rapidly accelerate virus destruction and clinical resolution of the viral infection. Many clinicians now feel that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine therapy for COVID-19 and other viruses is optimized by concomitant zinc administration. [39,40] Certainly, there is no good reason to avoid taking zinc with these agents.

As might be expected, drugs as potently antiviral to COVID-19 as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine would be expected to be effective preventive agents as well, particularly in the setting where exposure is known or strongly suspected to have taken place, or in a setting where repeated and substantial exposure will reliably occur, as in COVID-19-treating hospitals. [41,42] Many front-line health care workers are on such preventive protocols. But many of the physicians who are taking one of these agents to prevent COVID-19 infection are still resistant to giving it to infected patients. This is difficult to logically reconcile if patient welfare is of the uppermost concern.

Radiotherapy (improves, cures)
In a recent pilot trial at Emory University, five nursing home patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were given a single treatment of low-dose radiotherapy over the lungs. All five patients had radiographic evidence of pneumonia and required supplemental oxygen. All five were felt to be deteriorating from a clinical perspective. The radiotherapy consisted of a 10- to 15-minute application of 1.5 Gy (150 rads). Four of the five patients were noted to have a rapid improvement in their breathing, and clinical recovery was seen to occur between 3 and 96 hours post-irradiation.

General Recommendations
While many supplement regimens can be used for COVID-19 prevention, such regimens should include at a minimum vitamin C, vitamin D, magnesium chloride, and zinc. Any of many additional quality nutrient and antioxidant supplements can be added as desired, largely dependent on expense and personal preference.

Nebulizations of powerful antipathogen agents, especially hydrogen peroxide, can readily prevent respiratory viral infections like COVID-19 from taking hold, and initiating such nebulizations even after an infection has been contracted will still make a substantial contribution to a more rapid and complete recovery.

As noted earlier, interventions such as ozone and ultraviolet blood treatments have the potential to be effective monotherapies, although it is always a good idea to accompany such treatments with the baseline supplementation regimen and nebulizations as mentioned above.

In the hospitalized setting, intravenous vitamin C and dexamethasone should always be part of the treatment regimen. Nebulizations with hydrogen peroxide and budesonide can accelerate recovery substantially. Also, patients already on ventilator support should always be given vitamin C and dexamethasone along with these nebulizations in addition to anything else felt to be indicated by the attending physician.

Low doses of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine along with zinc should always be given in the setting of high-risk exposure. Azithromycin can be taken with these agents as well. Higher doses of these agents should always be part of any regimen in the treatment of a suspected or diagnosed COVID-19 patient, whether asymptomatic or already in the hospital.

Recap
While the politics of the COVID-19 pandemic are beyond the scope and aim of this article, there remain no valid medical reasons for not using any of the agents or interventions itemized above for either preventing or treating COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, many combinations of these treatments can be applied, depending on their availability and the clinical status of a given patient. Traditional medicine insists on "proof" of any therapy before it is used routinely, even though this standard of proof is never actually obtained for many of the usual prescription drug approaches to infections and other diseases. When an agent is inexpensive, virtually harmless, and with substantial evidence of providing benefit, there is no justification for a physician to refuse or even actively block its administration to a patient otherwise assured of prolonged suffering and likely death (as with hospitalized COVID-19 patients on ventilation support).

With the treatment options available, there is no good reason for most people to even contract COVID-19, and there is certainly no good reason for anyone to die from this virus, much less have a prolonged clinical course of infection with a great deal of needless suffering.

Please note: None of the information in this article is intended to be utilized by anyone as direct medical advice. Rather, the article is intended only to make the reader aware of other treatment possibilities and documented scientific information that can be further discussed with a chosen health care professional.

(Cardiologist and attorney Thomas E. Levy is the author of a number of books, including Curing the Incurable: Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and Toxins; Primal Panacea; and Stop America's #1 Killer. His email is televymd@yahoo.com).

References
1. Levy T (2011) Primal Panacea, Henderson, NV: MedFox Publishing. ISBN-13: 978-0983772804.

2. Marik P, Khangoora V, Rivera R et al. (2017) Hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective before-after study. Chest 151:1229-1238. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27940189

3. Levy T (2002) Curing the Incurable. Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and Toxins, Henderson, NV: MedFox Publishing. ISBN-13: 978-0977952021

4. Gonzalez M, Berdiel M, Miranda-Massari J et al. (2016) High dose intravenous vitamin C treatment for Zika fever. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine Volume 31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309478186_High_Dose_Intravenous_Vitamin_C_Treatment_for_Zika_Fever

5. Marcial-Vega V, Gonzalez-Terron G, Levy T (2015) Intravenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in the management of patients with Chikungunya. Bulletin of the Medical Association of Puerto Rico 107:20-24. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26035980

6. Gonzalez M, Berdiel M, Duconge J et al. (2018) High dose intravenous vitamin C and influenza: a case report. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine Volume 33. https://isom.ca/article/high-dose-vitamin-c-influenza-case-report

7. Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (2020) https://covid19criticalcare.com

8. Grant W, Lahore H, McDonnell S et al. (2020) Evidence that vitamin D supplementation could reduce risk of influenza and COVID-19 infections and deaths. Nutrients 12:988. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32252338

9. Dancer R, Parekh D, Lax S et al. (2015) Vitamin D deficiency contributes directly to the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thorax 70:617-624. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25903964

10. Qiu X, Kroeker A, He S et al. (2016) Prophylactic efficacy of quercetin 3-β-O-D-glucoside against Ebola virus infection. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 60:5182-5188. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27297486

11. Levy T (2019) Magnesium, Reversing Disease Henderson, NV: MedFox Publishing. ISBN-13: 978-0998312408.

12. Cepero S, Weiser M (2016) Advances of Ozone Therapy in Medicine and Dentistry. http://www.ozonetherapiesgroup.com

13. Rowen R, Robins H, Carew K et al. (2016) Rapid resolution of hemorrhagic fever (Ebola) in Sierra Leone with ozone therapy. African Journal of Infectious Diseases 10:49-54. https://journals.athmsi.org/index.php/AJID/article/view/3578/2261

14. Oliver T, Murphy D (1920) Influenzal pneumonia: the intravenous injection of hydrogen peroxide. The Lancet Feb 21, pp. 432-433. https://9gurus.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/090428.1920.Lancet.H202-Flu.pdf

15. Caruso A, Del Prete A, Lazzarino et al. (2020) Might hydrogen peroxide reduce the hospitalization rate and complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection? Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology Apr 22, online ahead of print. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32319881

16. Caruso A, Del Prete A, Lazzarino A (2020) Hydrogen peroxide and viral infections: a literature review with research hypothesis definition in relation to the current COVID-19 pandemic. Medical Hypotheses Jun 1, online ahead of print. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32505069

17. Memar M, Yekani M, Alizadeh N, Baghi H (2019) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: antimicrobial mechanisms and clinical application for infections. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 109:440-447. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30399579

18. Yamanel L, Kaldirim U, Oztas Y et al. (2011) Ozone therapy and hyperbaric oxygen treatment in lung injury in septic rats. International Journal of Medical Sciences 8:48-55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21234269

19. Rowen R (1996) Ultraviolet blood irradiation therapy (photo-oxidation), the cure that time forgot. Int J Biosocial Med Res 14:115-132. http://drferchoff.com/files/ubiarticle.pdf

20. Zhu Z, Guo Y, Yu P et al. (2019) Chlorine dioxide inhibits the replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by blocking viral attachment. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 67:78-87. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30395996

21. Kaly-Kullai K, Wittmann M, Noszticzius Z, Rosivall L (2020) Can chlorine dioxide prevent the spreading of coronavirus or other viral infections? Medical hypotheses. Physiology International 107:1-11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32208977

22. Over 100 Recoverded from Covid-19 with CDS by Physicians of the AEMEMI (2020) https://lbry.tv/@Kalcker:7/100-Recovered-Aememi-1:7

23. Determination of the Effectiveness of Oral Chlorine Dioxide in the Treatment of COVID 19 (2020) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343742

24. Singh A, Majumdar S, Singh R, Misra A (2020) Role of corticosteroid in the management of COVID-19: a systemic review and a clinician's perspective. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome 14:971-978. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32610262

25. Villar J, Ferrando C, Martinez D et al. (2020) Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine 8:267-276. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32043986

26. Szefler S, Eigen H (2002) Budesonide inhalation suspension: a nebulized corticosteroid for persistent asthma. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 109:730-742. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11941331

27. Saito M, Kikuchi Y, Lefor A, Hoshina M (2017) High-dose nebulized budesonide is effective for mild asthma exacerbations in children under 3 years of age. European Annals of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 49:22-27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28120603

28. Dai Q, Duan C, Liu Q, Yu H (2017) Effect of nebulized budesonide on decreasing the recurrence of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. American Journal of Otolaryngology 38:321-324. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28185668

29. McIntire A, Harris S, Whitten J et al. (2017) Outcomes following the use of nebulized heparin for inhalation injury (HIHI Study). Journal of Burn Care & Research 38:45-52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27532613

30. Rello J, Rouby J, Sole-Lleonart C et al. (2017) Key considerations on nebulization of antimicrobial agents to mechanically ventilated patients. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 23:640-646. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28347790

31. Turpeinen M, Nikander K (2001) Nebulization of a suspension of budesonide and a solution of terbutaline into a neonatal ventilator circuit. Respiratory Care 46:43-48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11175237

32. Bloch E, Shoham S, Casadevall A et al. (2020) Deployment of convalescent plasma for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Journal of Clinical Investigation 130:2757-2765. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32254064

33. Brown B, McCullough J (2020) Treatment for emerging viruses: convalescent plasma and COVID-19. Transfusion and Apheresis Science 59:102790. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32345485

34. Cortegiani A, Ingoglia G, Ippolito M et al. (2020) A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19. Journal of Critical Care 57:279-283. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32173110

35. Devaux C, Rolain J, Colson P, Raoult D (2020) New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against coronavirus: what to expect for COVID-19? International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 55:105938. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32171740

36. Gautret P, Lagier J, Parola P et al. (2020) Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents Mar 20, 105949. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32205204

37. Xue J, Moyer A, Peng B et al. (2014) Chloroquine is a zinc ionophore. PLoS One 9:e109180. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25271834

38. Xu Y, Xiao G, Liu L, Lang M (2019) Zinc transporters in Alzheimer's disease. Molecular Brain 12:106. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31818314

39. Derwand R, Scholz M (2020) Does zinc supplementation enhance the clinical efficacy of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine to win today's battle against COVID-19? Medical Hypotheses May 6, 142:109815. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32408070

40. Shittu M, Afolami O (2020) Improving the efficacy of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine against SARS-CoV-2 may require zinc additives-a better synergy for future COVID-19 clinical trials. Le Infezioni in Medicina 28:192-197. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32335560

41. Shah S, Das S, Jain A et al. (2020) A systematic review of the prophylactic role of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 23:613-619. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32281213

42. Huang M, Tang T, Pang P et al. (2020) Treating COVID-19 with chloroquine. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology 12:322-325. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32236562

The views expressed in this article are the author's and not necessarily those of the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service or all members of its Editorial Board. OMNS invites alternative viewpoints. Submissions may be sent directly to Andrew W. Saul, Editor, at the email contact address below.



Nutritional Medicine is Orthomolecular Medicine
Orthomolecular medicine uses safe, effective nutritional therapy to fight illness. For more information: http://www.orthomolecular.org


Find a Doctor
To locate an orthomolecular physician near you: http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v06n09.shtml


The peer-reviewed Orthomolecular Medicine News Service is a non-profit and non-commercial informational resource.


Editorial Review Board:
Ilyès Baghli, M.D. (Algeria)
Ian Brighthope, MBBS, FACNEM (Australia)
Gilbert Henri Crussol, D.M.D. (Spain)
Carolyn Dean, M.D., N.D. (USA)
Damien Downing, M.B.B.S., M.R.S.B. (United Kingdom)
Martin P. Gallagher, M.D., D.C. (USA)
Michael J. Gonzalez, N.M.D., D.Sc., Ph.D. (Puerto Rico)
William B. Grant, Ph.D. (USA)
Tonya S. Heyman, M.D. (USA)
Suzanne Humphries, M.D. (USA)
Ron Hunninghake, M.D. (USA)
Robert E. Jenkins, D.C. (USA)
Bo H. Jonsson, M.D., Ph.D. (Sweden)
Jeffrey J. Kotulski, D.O. (USA)
Peter H. Lauda, M.D. (Austria)
Thomas Levy, M.D., J.D. (USA)
Alan Lien, Ph.D. (Taiwan)
Homer Lim, M.D. (Philippines)
Stuart Lindsey, Pharm.D. (USA)
Victor A. Marcial-Vega, M.D. (Puerto Rico)
Charles C. Mary, Jr., M.D. (USA)
Mignonne Mary, M.D. (USA)
Jun Matsuyama, M.D., Ph.D. (Japan)
Joseph Mercola, D.O. (USA)
Jorge R. Miranda-Massari, Pharm.D. (Puerto Rico)
Karin Munsterhjelm-Ahumada, M.D. (Finland)
Tahar Naili, M.D. (Algeria)
W. Todd Penberthy, Ph.D. (USA)
Dag Viljen Poleszynski, Ph.D. (Norway)
Selvam Rengasamy, MBBS, FRCOG (Malaysia)
Jeffrey A. Ruterbusch, D.O. (USA)
Gert E. Schuitemaker, Ph.D. (Netherlands)
T.E. Gabriel Stewart, M.B.B.CH. (Ireland)
Hyoungjoo Shin, M.D. (South Korea)
Thomas L. Taxman, M.D. (USA)
Jagan Nathan Vamanan, M.D. (India)
Garry Vickar, M.D. (USA)
Ken Walker, M.D. (Canada)
Raymond Yuen, MBBS, MMed (Singapore)
Anne Zauderer, D.C. (USA)


Andrew W. Saul, Ph.D. (USA), Editor-In-Chief
Editor, Japanese Edition: Atsuo Yanagisawa, M.D., Ph.D. (Japan)
Editor, Chinese Edition: Richard Cheng, M.D., Ph.D. (USA)
Editor, French Edition: Vladimir Arianoff, M.D. (Belgium)
Robert G. Smith, Ph.D. (USA), Associate Editor
Helen Saul Case, M.S. (USA), Assistant Editor
Michael S. Stewart, B.Sc.C.S. (USA), Technology Editor
Jason M. Saul, JD (USA), Legal Consultant

Comments and media contact: drsaul@doctoryourself.com OMNS welcomes but is unable to respond to individual reader emails. Reader comments become the property of OMNS and may or may not be used for publication.

Click here to see a web copy of this news release: http://orthomolecular.activehosted.com/p_v.php?l=1&c=163&m=167&s=d67ddbd822498769060eb861d11edcdd
This news release was sent to tonybel@gmail.com. If you no longer wish to receive news releases, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: unsubscribe . To update your profile settings click here .

This article may be reprinted free of charge provided 1) that there is clear attribution to the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, and 2) that both the OMNS free subscription link http://orthomolecular.org/subscribe.html and also the OMNS archive link http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/index.shtml are included.


Riordan Clinic | Orthomolecular.org
3100 N Hillside Ave
Wichita, Kansas 67219
United States

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

Covid Not A Hoax, Just the Numbers Are. And Lots of Odds and Ends

These are just a few of the things people should be thinking about.  Every day I come across more information, too much to list it all here.  Do your research, go to the studies, or to the independent experts who have gone to the studies and can relate truthfully what they say.  If you get your information from CNN, USA Today, and the rest of the mainstream media or the government "scientists," then who knows what you'll learn but it won't be the truth.  And you'll never know or learn how to stay healthy.

1.  The governors and public health officials in five states mandated Covid-19 patients be put in nursing homes resulting in thousands of deaths.  NY, PA, CA, NJ, and I believe MI.  How many other states didn't mandate it but did it anyway is unknown, at least to me.

2.  30,000 - 60,000 Covid-19 deaths were in nursing homes and care facilities.  From what I've read, the larger number is probably the more accurate one.  And let's not forget about those who went to a hospital without having Covid and then caught it at the hospital.  That number is likely in the thousands.

3.  What one nurse reported who was on loan from Florida to NYC's Elmhurst Hospital Center.  There have been other nurses who have reported similar experiences.  Ignore at own peril.  Watch the video.  Hopefully, it won't have been censored.

4.  Hydroxychloroquine and zinc protocol (basically pennies a day and has already saved many hundreds of lives as reported by the doctors who used this) - terminated by FDA after huge successes reported.  In fact, in a study to show it was dangerous, they gave the participants 4 times the recommended dose, resulting in 396 deaths.  Another faulty study was published in the Lancet, then later retracted.  Studies are manipulated like this to get the desired outcome.  This protocol alone could probably end the pandemic now, but there's no money in it.  Instead, Fauci is pushing remdesivir for thousands of dollars and limited, if any, benefit.  Here is a lot more information on this topic.  Just read today (7/24/2020) that Remdesivir can cause liver problems and kidney damage.

5.  Censorship of anything that doesn't go along with the official government or big pharma narrative (even though doing this will probably cost many thousands of deaths and prolong the pandemic).

6.  All the masks (see previous posts about harms they can cause), social distancing, and shutdowns do is flatten the curve.  The area under the curves (whether flattened or not) would be the same.  What that means is, in the long run, the same amount of people will have gotten Covid-19 and died from it, but with the flattened curve, it will just be prolonged.  And there will be spikes in Covid on each attempt to re-open the economy.  Meanwhile, lives will be ruined, and suicides, domestic violence, child abuse, depression, world hunger and starvation, etc. will also spike due to the destruction of economies.  This will repeat over and over as it is doing now.

7.  Ventilators kill most people who are put on them.  How many were killed by these?

8.  Testing for Covid-19 wildly inaccurate.  Here is one article that explains why.  Is the following true?  I don't know, but wouldn't be surprised.  I've been hearing, over the past few days, that the results from some labs are coming back 100% positive.  The real number should have been around 11-14% it was found out later.



10.  Three to four months ago almost no one was wearing masks.  Their use has steadily increased since then.  Covid-19 has also steadily increased over the past several weeks.  Nice to see how effective the masks are...NOT.  There are many studies that have shown this would be the case, all ignored or called fake science by the media.  The CDC, WHO, Surgeon General of the U.S., and others all said not to wear masks at the beginning of the pandemic because they did no good.  It must not have fit the agenda/narrative of whoever it is who is running things.

11.  Perhaps the BIGGEST LIE OF ALL is the death count from Covid - all deaths are being labeled Covid-19 regardless of the actual cause.  If all deaths were coded correctly, deaths from Covid would most likely be LOWER than the seasonal flu.  And if hospitals didn't get $13,000 for each Covid case and $39,000 when they put a Covid case on a ventilator I have no doubt the death count would be a lot lower still.  But of course, you won't hear that in the news either, only the few who survive the use of a ventilator will be in the news.

BOTTOM LINE:  If they actually counted only the deaths that were directly caused by Covid-19, where you wouldn't have died had you not gotten a severe case, if they hadn't mandated people with Covid be put in nursing homes, if they didn't put people without Covid-19 in the same areas of hospitals with those that did have Covid-19, if they hadn't put people on venilators who didn't need to be put on venilators (so they could collect their $39,000), if they didn't lie about Hydroxychloroquine (with zinc and Azithromycin), if they didn't hide the benefits of IV-C, if they shared and didn't censor information about immune-supporting supplements, and if they shared in the media how to keep your immune system optimized so you could stay healthy....if they did all these things, Covid-19 would be a non-event, a nothing burger.  Covid-19 deaths would probably be under 10,000.

Now some odds and ends:

1.  Mandatory face masks are probably being used to show that it's those who aren't wearing them that are causing all the Covid-19 deaths, not the government incompetence.  Why?  There is evidence they cause harm in several ways, from concentrating viruses and bacteria to lowering oxygen levels in your blood and causing people to constantly touch their face.  And make you more susceptible to getting sick by weakening your immune system.  Not to mention all the legitimate studies show they do nothing to stop the spread.  Look around you - as more and more people are wearing them, cases are not going down.  In fact, they have been going up.

2.  Social distancing serves no purpose if the virus is spread by aerosol particles that stay suspended in the air for up to 30 minutes.  Or is it droplets?  Or surfaces?  Who knows, they keep changing the story to fit whatever the current push is.  If it's aerosol, every time someone with Covid-19 exhales to lighten their viral load it exposes everyone in the same enclosed area to COVID, plus anyone who later enters that area in the next half hour or so.  And those particles go right through masks.  Outdoors it's dispersed by the breezes.  This would explain the cruise ship outbreaks and that case of a family of 20 all getting sick who attended an indoor birthday party.  I read it takes about 10 minutes of exposure to get affected, so passing people on the street would have no effect.  If masks did any good it would be more likely they would be needed indoors than out.

3.  Due to a false sense of security, masks may actually cause more spread of Covid-19, as those who wear them may think they won't spread it because they're wearing a mask.

I have heard of people calling others who don't wear masks uncaring, lazy, stupid, etc.  (I've covered in detail the dangers of face masks in a recent post here).  I personally could care less if someone wears a mask, it's totally up to them.  Why?  Because unlike most people, I take care of my health and immune system.  If all those people who are blaming others would do the same, I doubt Covid-19 would be much of a problem if it is a problem any worse than the flu.  The numbers are so screwed up, I doubt anyone knows the reality.  Regardless, if proper precautions had been taken to protect those who are most at risk, the numbers would be a lot lower.  And there would be a lot less of them if they took care of themselves.  I've covered how to do this in prior posts.  I wonder how many followed the advice.  I'm tired of hearing people blaming others because they refuse to take care of themselves.  And I'm tired of them not doing real research from independent sources (before all of those get censored) and repeating what the lamestream (fake) media said, whether it's about face masks, social distancing, drugs or whatever.

Here's a rant from a nurse who basically said what I've been saying but with a little more colorful language - This is perfect and aimed at those who use disparaging language aimed at those who choose to go mask free. I truly hope you all read the whole thing. If you truly want to understand:

COVID Rant and the science behind cloth mask-wearing from an RN.* * * Nailed it! * * *  "I know. I have heard it all- apparently, those of us who won't just put our damn masks on would prefer if everyone's grandmas just keeled over and died.
Do you really think you lived in a society full of selfish assholes who never gave a crap about their neighbors, and it just took a plandemic for us all to show our naked, mask-less faces? Have you taken a moment to think about what could be behind so many people refusing to just cover their face holes? It's easy, you say. Well, I don't like it but I do it anyway. I can't breathe but. For everyone else. It's a sign of respect. It's an act of kindness to suffocate myself. That's what they tell me to think, so that's where my thinking ends.
Well, I hate to tell you, but many of us have actually given it plenty more thought than that. And if no ones laid out the facts for you, I am happy to oblige. I haven't worn a mask since early March, back when many of us still didn't have enough facts to make an informed decision. Lots have changed since then, but many people continue to live exactly the same way that we did back then- as if plenty of research and data hasn't been available. And as if it hasn't been clear many times how hypocritical those running the show have been and how mind-numbingly stupid the bottom-feeding media has behaved.
Let me tell you a few things about health. As a registered nurse, I've learned a bit. I've learned a whole lot more though that they won't tell you in nursing school, but some people like to ask me where's your medical background dumbass so I'm just putting that out there to save some people the trouble.
Real health is not the absence of disease or germs. Real health isn't about hand sanitizer or staying locked away in your home for months on end where the boogeyman can't find you. Real health is an inside job- it comes from eating real food, not the processed crap your government who loves you and has your well being at heart approves to sit on grocery store shelves indefinitely.
Real health comes from moving your body, staying hydrated, reducing stress, keeping your weight down, sleeping properly, avoiding toxins. No brainer right? We all know that. Well let me tell you we may know it but as Americans, we aren't exactly living it and as a nurse, I can tell you most of America believes that taking a pill can make a disease go away or injecting yourself with chemicals can eradicate a virus.
So all that being said. It is not my responsibility to protect the entire universe. It IS my responsibility to take care of my own body because the actual defense against a virus is to keep yourself in the best shape possible and then not to hide from germs but to face them. If you've taken care of yourself, you're young and healthy, facing the virus isn't a danger- in fact, it's necessary that some of us take the hit to build up real herd immunity, not the fake bullshit herd immunity. But if you've never once cared about your health before- I'm sorry to sound rude but facts don't care about feelings and it's not my job to suffocate all day so that you can maintain your delusion that a piece of fabric will keep you safe from a virus when you never really cared about your "health" until they told you to. Personal accountability, in this case, could literally make the difference, but in this country, we seem to have no concept of that notion.
So do I not wear a mask because Americans eat too much McDonalds? Well no. I'm just getting started. There hasn't been a single evidence-based study to date that proves that wearing a mask will prevent transmission. You're all walking around with these filthy masks on your faces when your immune system needs fresh air. Every cell in your body requires oxygen. And waste elimination. It's basic. Air exchange. You aren't blocking a virus but you sure are preventing real respiratory exchange which again, as a nurse, I can tell you will have some damaging effects over time.
But what about surgeons, you say? Surgeons wear masks for hours and they're doing complicated procedures and they don't pass out!
Well now ask yourself. Are you a fucking surgeon? Maybe you are. Do you have your arms elbow-deep in human organs while you're at Wal Mart touching all the things? I mean. You're literally touching ALL THE THINGS. And then worrying about someone six feet away sneezing an asymptomatic disease on you. Then touching all the things again.
But even if it could only help a little- isn't it worth it? I could be saving humanity and all it takes is a little oxygen deprivation!
Well. If you're still reading, I say, try again. Anytime they tell you to put your own needs aside for the sake of everyone else, you better stop right there and think (I know it's hard sometimes but you can do it!!).
Where have we heard that greater good argument before? Maybe injecting yourself with a warp speed cocktail that bypassed lots of clinical safety tests (which were already a joke in the first place but I digress.)
Maybe you're having second thoughts about that.
But it's for the "greater good" right? So just do it and stop complaining already.
Jeez. What's wrong with these people anyway.
There is so much more I could say. About how this virus has been a scam from the start (yes I know people are sick and people have died but it's also a shame how this virus has been exploited to the point that I don't believe a word of anything I read or hear anymore). But I'll just say that dirty piece of cloth you think your life depends on is pretty worthless.
If they even said everyone has to wear a N95 I would say well that's unnecessary but at least it's scientific. But the CDC lost me the minute I saw them demonstrate on their website how you could Pinterest your own mask. Supposedly this virus is so lethal that your groceries might kill you. But it's not strong enough to face that terrifying porous floral headband that's over your face holes.
Lastly? Cause I'm pretty sure no one is reading anymore. It's not a law. It never was. And it is my RIGHT as an American to say no (remember those little things? Rights?)
No I won't participate in this giant social experiment. No I won't lend these dumb fucking masks any credibility by suffocating myself all day. No I won't wear one in front of my children whose brains are still learning language development and how to read facial expressions.
No I won't wear one in an empty store. Or in a full one. Life is full of risks. And it is up to you, a THINKING human being, to weigh the risks of your actions the moment your feet touch the floor every morning and to accept the consequences of whatever risk you decide to take. And not wearing a mask is NOT A RISK. Not to me and not to anyone else.
Repeat after me- asymptomatic transmission is not a thing. The science has shown that. But y'all only pay attention to the science when it says what you want. We're not all walking around like ticking time bombs about to kill anyone we breathe on. But that's what they've told you because how they're keeping everyone compliant.
Please sit down and think about this. Take the mask off while you do. Y'all look like a bunch of mindless zombies, and you're acting like it also. And please don't spam me with ridiculous memes about peeing your pants FFS or sunscreen or seatbelts or how your face diaper is an act of love because I will come through my phone and shake you until common sense kicks in. Thanks so much."


Wednesday, June 17, 2020

Covid-19 - Things to Think About (With Some Great Links and Information)

I don't know where to start anymore - there is so much new information (and misinformation) every day.  Once again, I highly recommend "The HighWire."  In this episode, it covered WHO comments on asymptomatic carriers of Covid, an undercover nurse recording events at a NY hospital (she is not the only one reporting the truth about Covid - as I've mentioned (and have been confirmed from many sources) on previous blog posts, the numbers that are being reported can't be trusted and are highly inflated).  People are not only catching Covid in nursing homes, but also in hospitals.  I recently read about an actress from Days of Our Lives who went to the hospital with injuries from an accident and got Covid as a result of going to the hospital.  Here is the statistic on that:  "Nursing home residents and workers account for about one-third of all COVID-19 deaths in the U.S., and up to 20% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients actually caught it in the hospital while being treated for another ailment."  For more information just click on this link.  I just found this graphic:



Here's an article about Proton Pump Inhibitor drugs from ANH-USA.  Most drugs will make your outcome worse if you get Covid.  Just one more reason to go to health.  Here are some pointers on how to do that on the blog of a medical doctor (whom I totally agree with), just scroll down to (or you can read it all):  An Update on Supplement Usage During the Coronavirus Pandemic.  If you want the truth, go to the INDEPENDENT experts, not the CDC, WHO, FDA, or the government or those who work for them.  They all have agendas that are not in your best interest.  If they actually did have your interests at heart, they would tell you how to support your immune system and stay healthy.  But not only do they not tell you, but they also do their best to make sure no one else can, either.

One last word before you read the evidence about face masks below.  On social media people always claim posts are from people who aren't experts and don't know science - well, although I don't have a PhD or MD degree in these things, I go to those who do.  Many of the posts I read do the same as they post the references, as I do, and as I have here and in past posts.  Then I see something like, "I got vaccinated and I'm fine" or "I rode my bike with a mask on and no problem."  Well, I've gone out every day in 2020 (except two), and I'm fine.  So I guess everyone must be fine.  That doesn't even make sense.  People are getting headaches, some cases of pleurisy, etc., from face masks.  Everyone is different - what causes problems for one may not cause the same problems for someone else.

Some things I can't make-up.  This is one of them - a public health official in LA gave the reason that the beaches were closed.  She said it was because (drum roll) when a wave breaks it's like the ocean is sneezing.  Really - she said it on the news.

New on June 25 about face masks and real science with Denis Rancourt, PhD.  Here is the .PDF file on the science behind Masks Don't Work.  Fully referenced. 

FDA Advisory on hand sanitizers.

I've previously talked about masks but thought I would summarize once again with everything you need to know because I keep seeing why you should wear one but never about the dangers.  If someone is so scared of this virus, perhaps they should stay at home as that is what is recommended anyway.  This is long and has references and comes from Dr. Rashid Buttar.  If you go to his site, you can skip all the checkboxes if you want, just sign in with your email.  He does his research as does Dr. Blaylock who is also used for the following information.  At the end of this blog post is a form you can carry with you if you do not want to wear a mask - probably better if it is signed by a doctor.  This is a video of a conference given by Dr. Buttar, MD, with over 150 doctors attending and voting on the use of face masks:  Face Mask Conference Video.  Not sure how long it will stay posted.

Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy
Dr. Russell Blaylock warns that not only do face masks fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.

As businesses reopen, many are requiring shoppers and employees to wear a face mask. Costco, for instance, will not allow shoppers into the store without wearing a face mask. Many employers are requiring all employees to wear a face mask while at work. In some jurisdictions, all citizens must wear a face mask if they are outside of their own home. ⁃ TN Editor

With the advent of the so-called COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen a number of medical practices that have little or no scientific support as regards reducing the spread of this infection. One of these measures is the wearing of facial masks, either a surgical-type mask, bandana, or N95 respirator mask. When this pandemic began and we knew little about the virus itself or its epidemiologic behavior, it was assumed that it would behave, in terms of spread among communities, like other respiratory viruses. Little has presented itself after an intense study of this virus and its behavior to change this perception.  This is somewhat of an unusual virus in that for the vast majority of people infected by the virus, one experiences either no illness (asymptomatic) or very little sickness. Only a very small number of people are at risk of a potentially serious outcome from the infection—mainly those with underlying serious medical conditions in conjunction with advanced age and frailty, those with immune compromising conditions and nursing home patients near the end of their lives. There is growing evidence that the treatment protocol issued to treating doctors by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mainly intubation and use of a ventilator (respirator), may have contributed significantly to the high death rate in these select individuals.

By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves, and travel into the brain.  Russell Blaylock, MD

As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that “ None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”1 Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on the transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission.

It is also instructive to know that until recently, the CDC did not recommend wearing a face mask or covering of any kind unless a person was known to be infected, that is, until recently. Non-infected people need not wear a mask. When a person has TB we have them wear a mask, not the entire community of non-infected. The recommendations by the CDC and the WHO are not based on any studies of this virus and have never been used to contain any other virus pandemic or epidemic in history.

Now that we have established that there is no scientific evidence necessitating the wearing of a face mask for prevention, are there dangers to wearing a face mask, especially for long periods? Several studies have indeed found significant problems with wearing such a mask. This can vary from headaches to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, to hypoxia, all the way to serious life-threatening complications.

There is a difference between the N95 respirator mask and the surgical mask (cloth or paper mask) in terms of side effects. The N95 mask, which filters out 95% of particles with a median diameter >0.3 µm2, because it impairs respiratory exchange (breathing) to a greater degree than a soft mask, and is more often associated with headaches. In one such study, researchers surveyed 212 health care workers (47 males and 165 females) asking about the presence of headaches with N95 mask use, duration of the headaches, type of headaches and if the person had preexisting headaches.2

They found that about a third of the workers developed headaches with the use of the mask, most had preexisting headaches that were worsened by the mask-wearing, and 60% required pain medications for relief. As to the cause of the headaches, while straps and pressure from the mask could be causative, the bulk of the evidence points toward hypoxia and/or hypercapnia as the cause. That is, a reduction in blood oxygenation (hypoxia) or an elevation in blood C02 (hypercapnia). It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death.

A more recent study involving 159 health care workers aged 21 to 35 years of age found that 81% developed headaches from wearing a face mask.3 Some had pre-existing headaches that were precipitated by the masks. All felt like the headaches affected their work performance.  Unfortunately, no one is telling the frail elderly and those with lung diseases, such as COPD, emphysema or pulmonary fibrosis, of these dangers when wearing a facial mask of any kind—which can cause a severe worsening of lung function. This also includes lung cancer patients and people having had lung surgery, especially with partial resection or even the removal of a whole lung.  While most agree that the N95 mask can cause significant hypoxia and hypercapnia, another study of surgical masks found significant reductions in blood oxygen as well. In this study, researchers examined the blood oxygen levels in 53 surgeons using an oximeter. They measured blood oxygenation before surgery as well as at the end of surgeries.4 The researchers found that the mask reduced the blood oxygen levels (pa02) significantly. The longer the duration of wearing the mask, the greater the fall in blood oxygen levels.

The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs.  This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19, and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.5,6,7

People with cancer, especially if the cancer has spread, will be at further risk from prolonged hypoxia as the cancer grows best in a microenvironment that is low in oxygen. Low oxygen also promotes inflammation which can promote the growth, invasion, and spread of cancers.8,9 Repeated episodes of hypoxia has been proposed as a significant factor in atherosclerosis and hence increases all
cardiovascular (heart attacks) and cerebrovascular (strokes) diseases.10  There is another danger to wearing these masks on a daily basis, especially if worn for several hours. When a person is infected with a respiratory virus, they will expel some of the virus with each breath. If they are wearing a mask, especially an N95 mask or other tightly fitting masks, they will be constantly re-breathing the viruses, raising the concentration of the virus in the lungs and the nasal passages. We know that people who have the worst reactions to the coronavirus have the highest concentrations of the virus early on. And this leads to the deadly cytokine storm in a selected number.

It gets even more frightening. Newer evidence suggests that in some cases the virus can enter the brain.11,12 In most instances it enters the brain by way of the olfactory nerves (smell nerves), which connect directly with the area of the brain dealing with recent memory and memory consolidation. By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.13

It is evident from this review that there is insufficient evidence that wearing a mask of any kind can have a significant impact in preventing the spread of this virus. The fact that this virus is a relatively benign infection for the vast majority of the population and that most of the at risk group also survive, from an infectious disease and epidemiological standpoint, by letting the virus spread through the healthier population we will reach a herd immunity level rather quickly that will end this pandemic quickly and prevent a return next winter. During this time, we need to protect the at-risk population by avoiding close contact, boosting their immunity with compounds that boost cellular immunity and in general, care for them.

One should not attack and insult those who have chosen not to wear a mask, as these studies suggest that it is the wise choice to make.

References
1. bin-Reza F et al. The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: A systematic review of the scientific evidence. Resp Viruses 2012;6(4):257-67.
2. Zhu JH et al. Effects of long-duration wearing of N95 respirator and surgical facemask: a pilot study. J Lung Pulm Resp Res 2014:4:97-100.
3. Ong JJY et al. Headaches associated with personal protective equipment- A cross-sectional study among frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19. Headache 2020;60(5):864-877.
4. Bader A et al. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugia 2008;19:12-126.
5. Shehade H et al. Cutting edge: Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 negatively regulates Th1 function. J Immunol 2015;195:1372-1376.
6. Westendorf AM et al. Hypoxia enhances immunosuppression by inhibiting CD4+ effector T cell function and promoting Treg activity. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;41:1271-84.
7. Sceneay J et al. Hypoxia-driven immunosuppression contributes to the pre-metastatic niche. Oncoimmunology 2013;2:1 e22355.
8. Blaylock RL. Immunoexcitatory mechanisms in glioma proliferation, invasion and occasional metastasis. Surg Neurol Inter 2013;4:15.
9. Aggarwal BB. Nuclear factor-kappaB: The enemy within. Cancer Cell 2004;6:203-208.
10. Savransky V et al. Chronic intermittent hypoxia induces atherosclerosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2007;175:1290-1297.
11. Baig AM et al. Evidence of the COVID-19 virus targeting the CNS: Tissue distribution, host-virus interaction, and proposed neurotropic mechanisms. ACS Chem Neurosci 2020;11:7:995-998.
12.  Wu Y et al. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. Brain Behavior, and Immunity, In press.
13. Perlman S et al. Spread of a neurotropic murine coronavirus into the CNS via the trigeminal and olfactory nerves. Virology 1989;170:556-560.       


Dr. Russell Blaylock, the author of The Blaylock Wellness Report newsletter, is a nationally recognized board-certified neurosurgeon, health practitioner, author, and lecturer. He attended the Louisiana State University School of Medicine and completed his internship and neurological residency at the Medical University of South Carolina. For 26 years, he practiced neurosurgery in addition to having a nutritional practice. He recently retired from his neurosurgical duties to devote his full attention to nutritional research. Dr. Blaylock has authored four books, Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life, Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients, and his most recent work, Cellular and Molecular Biology of Autism Spectrum Disorders.


The news reports conflicting advice from medical experts.

On May 29, 2020 they reported:

“If you do not have any respiratory symptoms such as fever, cough, or runny nose, you do not need to wear a mask,” Dr. April Baller, a WHO public health specialist, says in a video on the site. “Masks should only be used by health care workers, caretakers, or by people who are sick with symptoms of fever and cough.”1

And one week later on June 6, 2020:

World Health Organization Director-General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said: “In areas with widespread transmission, WHO advises medical masks for all people working in clinical areas of a health facility, not only workers dealing with patients with COVID-19. . . . “Second, in areas with community transmission, we advise that people aged 60 years or over, or those with underlying conditions, should wear a medical mask in situations where physical distancing is not possible. Third, WHO has also updated its guidance on the use of masks by the general public in areas with community transmission.” Dr. Tedros also stated: “Masks are not a substitute for physical distancing.”2

We need to look at actual studies that test whether viruses are stopped by masks, and whether wearing them may be more harmful, i.e. more virus particles directed to the brain, not enough oxygen in the body to fight infection.

On April 1, 2020, the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at The University of Minnesota published a commentary in their newsletter titled:  “Masks-for-all for COVID-19 Not Based on Sound Data.”3

Now, this scientific reasoning is appearing around the world. From all my research, it is good to see the WHO April 29 recommendation.4

So what is the truth?

It is also good to see that TV News stations carried this message of the World Health Organization and identified the sharp contrast from the advice given by American public health officials who recommend everyone wear a mask in public.5
The WHO April 29 statement concurs with the conclusions of a 1920 study published in the American Journal of Public Health amid the Spanish flu pandemic by Dr. W.H. Kellogg detailing his investigations into whether masks protect from spreading viruses. The researchers identified that it required multiple, multiple layers to block viruses and that this amount of material prevented the person from obtaining enough oxygen through the mask.

To quote the study: “When a sufficient degree of density in the mask is used to exercise a useful filtering influence, breathing is difficult and leakage takes place around the edge of the mask.” This leakage leaves the mask not more than 50% effective in reducing infection. The article also stated: “Masks have not been demonstrated to have a degree of efficiency that would warrant their compulsory application for the checking of epidemics.”

Their summary stated:

“Masks have not been proved efficient enough to warrant compulsory application for the checking of epidemics, according to Dr. Kellogg, who has conducted a painstaking investigation with gauzes. This investigation scientific in character, omitting no one of the necessary factors. It ought to settle the much-argued question of masks for the public.”6

Recently published articles state similar findings: “In conclusion, both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.”7

A survey of healthcare workers wearing restrictive masks and protective eyewear while working with patients found that 81% of them reported new headaches.8

With airflow blocked enough for restriction of virus movement, it makes sense that headaches happen as there is not enough oxygen getting into the body, and headaches happen in a low oxygen environment such as the headaches people get when they are at high altitudes.

We have found in working with people with EMF symptoms from cell phone use that headaches are a primary complaint. This is due to the red blood cells sticking together, which prevents their ability to supply the necessary oxygen we humans need to function. It makes sense that the restrictive airflow through highly efficient masks would result in reduced oxygen levels that would result in the development of headaches.

Mask pore sizes are larger than the size of viruses.

Pore sizes of masks are many times larger than the size of viruses. Viruses are so tiny, they can easily slip through most any type of mask that is not NK95 rated. The CDC does not recommend that the public wear the smaller pore surgical grade masks, as they are in short supply and need to be reserved for health care workers and first responders.9

The coronavirus is about 0.120 μm (micrometer) in diameter.10

The pore size of masks ranges from 80 to 500 μm, which means that viruses of 0.120 μm can slip through the pores of masks exceptionally easily.

Cloth Masks

Researchers looking at whether masks can block viruses found: “This study showed that the filtering efficiency of cloth face masks were relatively lower, and washing and drying practices deteriorated the efficiency.” . . . “The poor efficiency was due to the presence of larger sized pores. Our study also demonstrated that washing and drying cycle deteriorates the filtering efficiency due to change in pore shape and clearance. We also found that stretching of the CM [cloth masks] surface alters the pore size and potentially decreases the filtering efficiency. The findings of this study suggest that CM are not effective, and that effectiveness deteriorates if used after washing and drying cycles and if used under stretched condition.”11

Other researchers found similar results for cloth masks.

A study in the British Medical Journal found: “Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.” The study concluded: “This study is the first RCT [Randomized Controlled Trial] of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks globally. However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs [Health Care Workers], particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.”12

I am excited to send this edition of NewsFlash, because I have had this critical subject in mind as I kept reading the many articles identifying the new health problems that arise with the wearing of masks by the general public.  It is time for our health agencies and officials to stop requiring we wear face masks in public or at work, and change their recommendations to ones that are not inclined to create more health problems than those they are attempting to protect us from.  Please share this information with everyone you meet, it is critical for the health of our society.

References
Who Website. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: When and how to use masks. Retrieved May 29, 2020 from: www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/when-and-how-to-use-masks
Fox News Website. Report on face masks’ effectiveness for COVID-19 divides scientists. Retrieved June 3, 2020 from: www.foxnews.com/science/effectiveness-of-face-masks-divides-scientists-in-new-report
Brosseau L, Sietsema M. COMMENTARY: Masks-for-all for COVID-19 not based on sound data. Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. April 1, 2020.
Who Website. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: When and how to use masks. Retrieved May 29, 2020 from: www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/when-and-how-to-use-masks
Fox News Website. Report on face masks’ effectiveness for COVID-19 divides scientists. Retrieved June 3, 2020 from: www.foxnews.com/science/effectiveness-of-face-masks-divides-scientists-in-new-report
Kellogg WH, MacMillan G. An experimental study of the efficacy of gauze face masks. Am J Public Health (NY). 1920 Jan; 10(1): 34–42. doi: 10.2105/ajph.10.1.34.
Bae S, Kim MC, Kim JY, et al. Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2: A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 6:M20-1342. doi: 10.7326/M20-1342.
Ong J, Bharatendu C, Goh Y. Headaches Associated with Personal Protective Equipment – A Cross-Sectional Study Among Frontline Healthcare Workers During COVID-19. Headache. 2020 May;60(5):864-877. doi: 10.1111/head.13811.
CDC Website. Recommendation Regarding the Use of Cloth Face Coverings, Especially in Areas of Significant Community-Based Transmission. Retrieved May 31, 2020 from: www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover.html
Viralzone Website. Coronaviridae. Retrieved May, 31, 2020 from: https://viralzone.expasy.org/30?outline=all_by_species
Neupane BB, Mainali S, Sharma A, Giri B. Optical microscopic study of surface morphology and filtering efficiency of face masks. PeerJ. 2019; 7: e7142. Published online 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7142.
MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, et al. A Cluster Randomized Trial of Cloth Masks Compared with Medical Masks in Healthcare Workers. BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 22;5(4):e006577.doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577.

 Now, about social distancing.  Where did they get the 6 feet from?  Do the viral particles suddenly self destruct at 6 feet from you?  Is there an invisible wall around you at 6 feet?  No studies have been done supporting that distance.  In fact, "recent research in the New England Journal of Medicine found that when the virus was suspended in a mist under laboratory conditions, it remained “viable and infectious” for three hours — though researchers have said that time period would probably be no more than half an hour in real-world conditions."  If this is indeed the case, then 6 feet won't do anything.  Aerosol particles are like dust, they float around, so anyone walking near where you had been in the next half hour would be exposed.  And if you are outside and there is a breeze, think how far those particles could go in half an hour.  But wait, there's more!  Social Distancing Study  This one shows how social distancing may actually increase cases of Covid.  And these 13 studies show that all-cause mortality is increased due to social distancing.  These are all things that must be considered...but haven't been.

Now for the NOTE to carry with you if you choose not to wear a face mask:

To Whom This May Concern,

_____________ is medically exempt from any regulation mandating face mask usage or any other airway restriction for any reason.  Wearing a mask will pose a far greater health risk to this individual including but not limited to a compromised airway, increased risk of hypoxia, pseudohypoxia, hypercapnia and significantly increase the risk for histotoxic hypoxic injury. In addition, the results of wearing a mask will increase the cortisol levels inducing a sympathetomimetic drive, decreasing the lymphocyte subpopulation, increasing suppression of the immune system resulting in physical and medical harm that could be easily be preventable.

Under the Americans Disability Act (ADA) and HIPPA, a patient is not required to disclose his or her medical condition. It should be noted that any individual, organization, business, or agency could be fined up to $75,000 for the first ADA violation and up to $150,000 for any subsequent violations.

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12134, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 provides for enforcement activities against an entity alleged to have violated federal law, required to be disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. For more information, feel free to contact the Department of Justice ADA Violation Information Line at 800-514-0300.

Thank you,


Your Doctor’s Signature

Thursday, May 21, 2020

A Mass Casualty Event and Latest Episode of The HIghwire

This started out as short post with only two links (Well, it's a few days later and I'm adding another link):

Newest Link - This link is to Dr. Rashid Buttar hosting a doctor's Covid-19 roundtable with about a160 diverse group of doctors from around the world giving their input into questions regarding face masks, social distancing, effects of 5G on your immune system, and other Covid-19 questions.  Just like the moderator I was amazed at the consensus of all those doctors.  There are those who attack Dr. Buttar outside this roundtable, but almost all of the 160 doctors here agree with him.  If you think everything they are doing for Covid-19 is good, then you need to watch this for another point of view and the reasons why many do not agree with current policies.

The first one is a letter signed by over 500 physicians on why we need to open the country now.  Here is the Link.

The second one is The Highwire, May 21, 2020 episode with an interview with Alan Dershowitz along with 10 reasons why not to be CoronaPhobic - and can be seen HERE.  Everything, as always, is backed up by science.

Before you criticize anyone for wanting to open the country, for not wearing a mask or anything else related to Covid-19, please read and/or listen to each of the links.  If you disagree, please do the research, not from government doctors, the mainstream media, or the drug companies, but from independent sources without conflicts of interest assuming you are after the truth.  For lots more info, just scroll down to previous posts.

I told you this one would be short.  Well, the above portion is.  But I do have to add a couple of other things.

I don't understand what people don't understand about face masks (other than they are blindly following whatever the fake news media and the corrupt CDC tells them).  Two South Korean studies showed they do not stop outgoing viral particles from leaving and also showed they contaminate the inside and outside of the mask.  A study in the U.S. with surgeons showed they lower your blood oxygen levels (exactly what you don't want as that is what the virus also does).  Plus you are concentrating your own viral load by inhaling the viruses you exhaled into your nasal passages and lungs.  Wearing one blocks your airflow which causes stress, thus increasing cortisol levels (which weakens the immune system), and finally, aerosol particles go right through it along with the virus you were trying to block.  Why wear it - about the only thing it might do is block some of the bigger droplets from escaping if you cough or sneeze while sick, and then you shouldn't have been out and about anyway. But this is really the wrong conversation - we should be talking about how to keep your immune system optimized to lessen your odds of getting any virus and also lessening your odds of a severe reaction to any of them.  Bottom line:  Many more reasons not to wear one than to wear one.  Look at what they wear in hospitals - their face masks are much better than what you might be wearing, and they are still getting sick.  The CDC, Fauci, the surgeon general, etc. have flip-flopped on this, the last I heard the WHO said not to wear them (although they may have changed by now, too), and the research shows the dangers of wearing them.

How anyone can trust the so-called public health officials is beyond me after they mandated nursing homes and care centers take in those still sick with Covid-19.  Now thirty percent of all deaths in the U.S. from Covid-19 are in those places.  Instead of protecting them from Covid, they exposed them.  What they are trying to sell to you as the "New Normal" is Abnormal.

Friday, May 8, 2020

120 Experts from Around the World on Covid-19

The original Website is in German - I used Google Translate to translate it as shown below.  The original is at the following link:  https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/120-expertenstimmen-zu-corona

It's a nice vindication when everything I've been saying over the past several weeks about Covid-19 has been mirrored by the comments below.  What have I been saying?  Briefly, the deaths from Covid-19 have been inflated because of the CDC guidelines, the lockdown will probably cause more harm than the virus, the total cases were a lot higher than reported, the media's fear-mongering was just that, etc.  Now you don't have to believe me...read what the experts say.  I have no doubt there will still be those who disagree, some due to fear, others because they have an agenda they want to force on you (like some dangerous vaccine or drug).  Or perhaps they are out for the profits, after all, 7 Billion doses of a vaccine or drug would be worth a fortune - just look at the stock prices of the companies working on them.

If you want to be afraid of something, be very afraid of a medical dictatorship, where you are tracked everywhere you go (if you are allowed out at all), vaccines that might kill or injure you are mandated, you can't hold your date's hand or get within 6 feet of him/her, and on and on.  Basically, it would be no different than living in North Korea or China - if that doesn't scare you, then I think all hope is lost.  It scares me a lot more than the virus which I have no doubt my immune system can handle with little problem.  Now for the expert comments on Covid-19.

Monday, April 20, 2020, 12:00 p.m.
~ 62 minutes reading time
120 expert opinions on Corona
High-ranking scientists, doctors, lawyers and other experts worldwide criticize the handling of the coronavirus.
by Jens Bernert

Here you will find a selection of over 120 expert opinions on corona, including a number of statements by high-ranking doctors and virologists.  This list does not claim to be complete and is also available as a printable PDF file (1).

"He and his team are examining the corona victims in Hamburg: Now the Hamburg medical examiner Klaus Püschel has appealed to Chancellor Angela Merkel to slowly open up Germany again. 'Now is the right time'  Püschel says to the 'Hamburger Abendblatt'. He added: 'The time of virologists is over. We should now ask others what is the right thing to do in the corona crisis, such as intensive care medicine. 'According to his findings, Covid-19 is' a comparatively harmless viral disease'. The Germans would have to learn to live with it, without quarantine. The fatalities he examined all had such serious previous illnesses that, even if it sounds hard, they would all have died in the course of this year, 'said Püschel ”(2).

Professor Dr. Klaus Püschel is a forensic doctor and head of forensic medicine in Hamburg

“'We come to a much lower value of 1.6 per thousand. So if we have 1,000 Danes who have had this infection, then there are one or two who have died with it. '(…) Together with colleagues, he performed blood tests on almost 1,500 blood donors (...) The blood was used to test for coronavirus - test antibodies  and preliminary results shed new light on the number of infected people ”(3).

Professor Dr. Henrik Ullum, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Denmark, Section for Transfusion Medicine, Center of Diagnostic Investigation

"What we need is to control the panic," he said. Overall, we will be fine.  (...) But he also accuses the media of causing unnecessary panic by focusing on the relentless increase in the cumulative number of cases and highlighting celebrities who become infected with the virus. In contrast, the flu has contracted 36 million Americans since September and killed an estimated 22,000 the CDC said, but most of these deaths are not reported ”(4).

Professor Dr. Michael Levitt, Professor of Biochemistry, Stanford University, USA. Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2013

"Personally, I would say the best advice is to spend less time watching TV news,
which are sensational and not very good. I personally consider this Covid outbreak to be a bad winter flu epidemic. In this case, we had 8000 deaths in the risk groups last year, i.e. over 65% people with heart disease etc. I don't think the current Covid will exceed that number.  We suffer from a media epidemic! ”(5).

Professor Dr. John Oxford from Queen Mary University of London, UK, the world's leading virologist and influenza specialist

“I feel what is going on right now is what we experience more or less every winter. (...) The contagion is high.  But in my view, the disease is not as bad as influenza. (…) I believe that you only look at one thing selectively here and fill it with a certain panic. (...) I believe that we have had situations like this several times and that the measures are now being taken too far.  (…) We need air and sun, air dilutes the viruses and sun with UV light kills them. But no curfew! You don't get infected on the street! ”(6).

Professor Dr. Karin Mölling, internationally renowned virologist. Former director of the Institute for Medical Virology in Zurich, Switzerland. Cross of Merit 1.  Class of the FRG

"Covid-19. Sharp criticism of ARD and ZDF for reporting on the corona virus. (...) As a result, television stages threats and executive power at the same time - and practices 'system journalism'. (...) The editors-in-chief have abdicated, 'concludes Jarren. The reporting lacked all distinctions, to meet and ask: Who has which expertise? Who appears in which role? ’Mostly individual statements are sent, there is no real debate between experts, writes the media scientist” (7).

Professor Dr. Otfried Jarren, Institute for Communication Science and Media Research at the University of Zurich, President of the Swiss Media Commission in Switzerland

“First of all, the tripling of the tests resulted in a little more than tripling the number of people who tested positive.  This tripling was demonstrated to the citizens as a tripling of the infected. (...) Far-reaching decisions require secure foundations. This is exactly what has been neglected so far. The repeated equation of the number of people who tested positive with the number of people infected obscured the Dead too. (...) The government's standard of when measures should be weakened is based on an apparent number of infected people, which has nothing to do with reality ”(8).

Professor Dr. Gerd Bosbach, professor of statistics, mathematics and empirical economic and social research and co-Author of the well-known book "Lies with Numbers"

"First analyzes of Austrian COVID-19 deaths by age and gender:
We analyze the age and gender distribution of the reported COVID-19 deceased in Austria. In line with international studies, the Austrian data also suggest that the risk of death increases sharply with age. The observed age dependency is consistent with that of the general annual risk of death in Austria ”(9).

Institute for Medical Statistics (IMS) of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria

"'Who can calculate and has an understanding of numbers, is not defenselessly exposed to the dizziness of statistics. This proves to be particularly useful in the corona crisis. 'Meyerhöfer also sees a crisis in mathematical education'. 'We see rapidly increasing numbers of infected people, and this curve frightens us.' (...) 'They are numbers, legitimize the blocking of contacts and business closings '(…) Meyerhöfer refers to the statistical handling of the deceased:' In statistical practice, a person who dies with Corona is counted as a person who died from Corona. It does not tell whether he died of Corona ’” (10).

Professor Dr. Wolfram Meyerhöfer, Professor of Mathematics Didactics

“The number of reported infections is not very meaningful, since no population-based approach was chosen, the measurement points to a past time and a high rate of untested (especially asymptomatic) infected people can be assumed. (...) The general preventive measures (e.g. social distancing) are theoretically poorly secured, their effectiveness is limited and also paradoxical (the more effective, the greater the risk of a 'second wave') and they are not efficient in terms of collateral damage ”(11).

Prof. Dr. Matthias Schrappe, Hedwig François-Kettner, Dr. Matthias Gruhl, Franz Knieps, Prof. Dr. Holger Pfaff, Prof. Dr. Gerd Glaeske, thesis paper on the pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 / Covid-19

"Tom Jefferson, an epidemiologist and honorary research fellow at the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University, said the results were 'very, very important'. He told the BMJ: 'The sample is small, and more data will be available. It is also not clear how exactly these cases were identified. But let's just say that they can be generalized. And even if they are 10% down, this indicates that the virus is everywhere. If - and I emphasize if the results are representative, then we have to ask: why the hell do we lock ourselves up? ’” (12).

Dr. Thomas Jefferson, epidemiologist and research fellow at the University of Oxford, UK

"In both China and South Korea, social distancing only began long after the number of infections had already decreased, and it has therefore had very little impact on the epidemic. This means that herd immunity has already been achieved there, or you are about to reach herd immunity. It was imminent. But by ordering social distancing, they prevented the endpoint from actually coming which is why we still see new cases in South Korea a few weeks after the peak ”(13).

Professor Dr. Knut Wittkowski from New York, USA

"After a long period of reflection, I turn to the remaining reasoned. And despite possible hostility, shit storms or stigmatization, I don't want to lose my right, To critically question comments by journalists, so-called experts, and decisions by political decision-makers. (...) Percentage of serious cases and death rates overestimated by a factor of 10. (…) Anyone who wrongly assesses the current procedure as appropriate would have to do so on the occasion of the annual Data with us probably have to require anew every year in the influenza season with the same consequence ”(14).

Professor Dr. Dr. Martin Haditsch, specialist in microbiology, virology and infection epidemiology, Austria

"'The quality of care is going down', says the chairman of the German Depression Aid Foundation, Professor Ulrich Hegerl. 'That could cost lives. The number of suicides could increase. ' Depression is the cause of most suicides every year. (...) The German Depression Aid recommends those affected
Stay active in times of domestic quarantine and maintain a daily rhythm. Sleep times should not be extended because too much sleep can increase depression severity "(15).

Professor Dr. Ulrich Hegerl, University Hospital Frankfurt, Chairman of the German Depression Aid Foundation

“In the past, pneumonia at the end of life was called the friend of the elderly. And now you go there, diagnose the corona infection and turn it into an intensive care case and of course you still can't save the patient. They are just too seriously ill.”(16).

Dr. Matthias Thöns, specialist in anesthesiology emergency, pain and palliative care.

"In my first video on COVID-19, I suggested (...) that the death rate should be around 0.7%. The opposite was proven to me today. The number of deaths is actually one tenth of them. Here is the unvarnished truth: COVID-19 is not much worse than bad flu ”(17).

Professor Sam Vaknin, Israel

"The fear of Covid-19 is based on its high estimated death rate - according to the World Health Organization and other organizations, 2 to 4% of people with confirmed Covid-19 have died. (...) We believe that this estimate is profoundly incorrect.  (…) If the number of actual infections is much larger than the number of cases - by orders of magnitude larger - then the actual mortality rate is also much lower. This is not only plausible but, based on what we know so far, is also likely ”(18).

Professor Dr. Eran Bendavid and Professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya are medical professors at Stanford University, USA

“In infectious diseases, a distinction is made between infection and illness. So only patients with symptoms - like fever or cough in this case - should be included in the statistics as new cases. In other words: a new infection, determined by a laboratory test does not necessarily mean that we are dealing with a newly ill patient who will need a hospital bed. (...) Draconian measures that restrict people's fundamental rights in such a comprehensive way can only be imposed if there is reliable evidence that a new virus is extremely dangerous. (...) Has there ever been such a scientifically founded indication for COVID-19? In my view, the simple answer is: no ”(19).

Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, specialist in microbiology and infection epidemiology, former head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the University of Mainz

“In Heinsberg, for example, a 78-year-old man with previous medical conditions died of heart failure, and that without Sars-2 involving the lungs. Since he was infected, he naturally appears in the Covid 19 statistics. The question is, whether he would not have died anyway, even without Sars-2. Around 2,500 people die every day in Germany, and there have been twelve deaths in the past three weeks, and there has been a connection to Sars-2. Of course people will still die, but I lean out of the window and say: It could well be that in 2020 we will not have more deaths than in any other year ”(20).

Professor Dr. Hendrick Streeck, Professor of Virology and Director of the Institute for Virology and HIV Research at the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn

"We need to keep these serious measures of society as a whole [note: interview question about contact closures and exit restrictions] as short and as low as possible, because they could potentially cause more illnesses and deaths than the coronavirus itself. (...) We know that, for example, unemployment creates illness and even increased mortality. It can also drive people into suicide. Restricting freedom of movement is likely to have a further negative impact on the health of the population ”(21).

Professor Dr. Gérard Krause, Head of Epidemiology at Helmholtz Center for Infection Research

"That is not the impression I get from talking to my colleagues in Germany. We agree, for example, that there is no point in closing the borders at this point. We also agree that it is necessary to minimize social contacts. But we also agree that it is very difficult to predict what will happen when you close schools. A lot of things happen when you do that: children are affected, society, especially parents. (…) That means, that the effect of this measure on public health will be much worse than the spread of the virus in schools ”(22).

Dr. Anders Tegnell, head of the Swedish health authority

"Beate Bahner, specialist lawyer for medical law from Heidelberg, announces a lawsuit against the corona regulation Baden-Württemberg to: The measures taken by the federal and state governments are blatantly unconstitutional and violate a multitude of fundamental rights of citizens in Germany to an extent never seen before. (...) Weekly restrictions on going out and bans on contact based on the darkest model scenarios (without considering factual-critical expert opinions) and the complete closure of companies and businesses without any evidence of infection risk from these businesses and companies are grossly unconstitutional ”(23).

Beate Bahner, medical law specialist, author of five medical law books.

“Total algorithmic population control. If you cannot show a green button on your surveillance smartphone in Wuhan, which signals that you are probably not infected, you can only move on foot and may not enter restaurants and the like. In South Korea, recordings from surveillance cameras, Credit card data and GPS data are evaluated to identify and track potential virus carriers. Covid-19 is like a heavenly gift for the plans of the World Economic Forum. (…) And thanks to Covid-19, a lot of people now find these totalitarian opportunities even desirable ”(24).

Dr. Norbert Häring, Journalist and economist

“Finally, the use of non-invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit is controversial. Considering the above factors, clinicians may not resort to non-invasive ventilation in critically ill patients with ARDS due to COVID-19, until further data from the COVID-19 epidemic are available "(25).

Professor Dr. Silvio A. Ñamendys-Silva, intensive care doctor, Mexico

“The Robert Koch Institute is changing the way it is counted, which makes the data increasingly messy. It is becoming increasingly difficult to make an objective summary.  More and more frightening pictures and reports are rushing in on us without anything recognizable changing in the numbers ”(26).

Dr. Bodo Schiffmann, medical doctor

“We know corona viruses from the past (…) But the data suggest that this disease is less dangerous than influenza.  (With) influenza, we can all still remember well how it came to a serious outbreak situation in 2017. Ultimately, with 27,000 dead in Germany and those 27,000 dead that seem to have displaced some. (...) It cannot be that we only care about Corona and that somewhere there is a risk that any other outbreaks of germs, for example, result ”(27).

Professor Dr. Jochen A. Werner, Medical Director and CEO of the University Medical Center Essen

"Given the well-known fact that 7-15% of acute respiratory diseases (ARE) are always caused by coronaviruses in every 'flu wave', the case numbers that are now continuously added are still completely within the normal range. About one in every thousand people die from the winter infection waves.  By selectively using detection methods - for example only in clinics and medical outpatient clinics - this rate can of course easily increase to a frightening level, because those who need help are usually worse off than those who recover at home ”(28)

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, internist, pulmonologist, Specialist in hygiene and environmental medicine. Member of the German Bundestag from 1994 to 2009

"Is our fight against the coronavirus worse than the disease? (...) Possible application of a 'herd immunity' approach (...) The data from South Korea (...) show that 99 percent of active cases in the general population are 'mild' and do not need specific medical treatment. (…) The deaths are mainly found in the elderly, in people with serious chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease, and in people in both groups.  This does not apply to infectious flagella like the flu. The flu also hits older and chronically ill people hard, but it also kills children ”(29).

Dr. David Katz, Yale University, USA, founding director of the Yale University Prevention Research Center

"It’s usually that people willingly give up their freedom, if you want to protect yourself against an external threat. And the threat is usually a real threat, but it is usually exaggerated. I'm afraid that's what we're seeing now. (...) And anyone who has studied history will recognize the classic symptoms of collective hysteria here.  Hysteria is contagious (…) whether the cure is perhaps worse than the illness ”(30).

Jonathan Sumption, former judge of the British Supreme Court

"It can be deduced from this That the mortality rate of COVID 19 is well below 1%: This finding was also included in a study by colleague Anthony Fauci from the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is based on a report based on 1099 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 - Concentrated patients from 552 Chinese hospitals.  This suggests that the overall clinical outcomes of COVD-19 might ultimately be similar to severe seasonal flu, which has a mortality rate of around 0.1%, or pandemic flu like that of 1957 or 1968, and not that of SARS or MERS, which are characterized by a lethality of 10% or 36% and which unbelievable to say that there have been no scaremongering in our country ”(31).

Professor Dr. Giulio Tarro, virologist, Italy

"But Prof. Ricciardi added that Italy's death rate can also be high due to the way doctors report the deaths. (…) 'A re-evaluation by the National Health Institute showed that only 12 percent of the death certificates showed a direct connection to the coronavirus, while 88 percent of the patients who died had at least one previous illness - many had two or three, ”he said” (32).

Professor Dr. Walter Ricciardi is scientific advisor to the Italian Minister of Health

“This evidence fiasco creates tremendous uncertainty about the risk of dying from Covid-19. Reported deaths, such as the official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, are appalling - and meaningless. Patients who have been tested on SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately large with severe symptoms and poor results.  Since most health systems have limited testing capacity, the selection bias could even increase in the near future. (…) A population-wide death rate of 0.05% is lower than that of seasonal flu. If this is the actual rate,
locking the world off with potentially enormous social and financial consequences can be completely irrational ”(33).

Professor Dr. John Ioannidis, Stanford University, USA

"Corona: A mass panic epidemic. (...) The WHO estimates that one flu season kills around 500,000 people, i.e. about 50 times more than those who have died during the more than three-month coronavirus epidemic. (...) No such draconian measures were taken during the 2009 influenza pandemic, and of course they cannot be used every winter that lasts all year round, as it is always winter somewhere.  We cannot switch off the whole world permanently ”(34).

Professor Dr. Peter C. Gøtzsche, medical researcher and professor at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark

"The media stir up fear of the corona virus (...) Every winter we have a virus epidemic with thousands of deaths and millions of people infected in Germany.
And corona viruses always have their part in it. (…) Anyone who is only exposed to quarantine measures and suffers financial damage because of a positive coronavirus PCR test may be entitled to compensation under Paragraph 56 of the Infection Protection Act.  But you should also defend yourself against senseless deprivation of liberty ”(35).

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, internist, pulmonologist, specialist in hygiene and environmental medicine. Member of the German Bundestag from 1994 to 2009

"SARS-CoV-2, the novel corona virus from China, spreads worldwide and despite its currently low incidence outside of China and the Far East triggers an enormous response. Four common corona viruses are currently in circulation and cause millions of cases worldwide. This article compares the incidence
and mortality rates of these four common coronaviruses with those of SARS-COV-2 (…) He concludes that SARS-CoV-2 is likely to be overestimated because 2.6 million people die from respiratory infections each year compared to less than 4,000 deaths from SARS-CoV-2 at the time of writing of this article ”(36).

French scientists Yanis Roussel, Audrey Giraud-Gatineau, Marie-Thérèse Jimenoe, Jean-Marc Rolain, Christine Zandotti, Philippe Colson and Didier Raoult in a contribution to the corona crisis

"At the end of the year, however, all states with prosperity will be irreparably indebted,  all people with material wealth have been expropriated, the medium-sized economy has been decimated, the large banks have been restructured thanks to their loans to sovereigns, the so-called health sector has become even more bloated and big pharma has become even richer.  (...) Everyone will live in fear of contagion and will be unemployed in a socially isolated manner or vegetate in the 'home office' with online orders. The survivors will need everything above the bare minimum to raise the protection money for banks and big pharma ”(37).

Dr. Gerd Reuther, medical doctor

"The numbers of young coronavirus sufferers are misleading (...) Vernazza therefore calls for all of the rash decisions made in recent weeks to be reflected upon. If almost 90 percent of the infections go unnoticed, it makes no sense to test all people. (…) The new knowledge shows that many of the measures may even be counterproductive. Above all, he thinks it is wrong to close schools, as a curfew in the epidemiological sense would not be the right thing ”(38).

Professor Dr. Pietro Vernazza, Infectiologist, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen (Switzerland)

"While everyone is talking about the corona virus, one hears little of the flu wave at the moment. According to experts, the risk of infection and mortality in influenza viruses are approximately the same as in coronavirus. 'Corona is by no means more dangerous than influenza,' says chief physician Clemens Wendtner from the Schwabinger Clinic for Infectious Diseases,
where seven of the thirteen corona infected people are being treated in Germany. 'We assume that the mortality rate is well below one percent, and even more in the alcohol range,' explains Wendtner. This is a similar size to that of influenza ”(39).

Professor Dr. Clemens Wendtner, chief physician at the Schwabinger Clinic for Infectious Diseases

"The virologists, who are now significantly influencing political events, are taking advantage of a redefinition of 'pandemic' by the World Health Organization (WHO) for their form of scaremongering. While a pandemic was previously only declared when a virus causes significant disease rates worldwide, Since 2017, the sole spread of viruses has been a reason for initiating a phased monitoring and virus control plan. However, since all forms of viruses are spreading rapidly across the world due to globalization, there is basically always a pandemic. And every year there are new viruses that are spreading rapidly in the global population. It thus becomes a matter of arbitrariness or of special interests to declare a pandemic with a certain virus ”(40).

Professor Dr. Franz Ruppert, psychotraumatologist

"The EU Commission met with Facebook & Co., to coordinate steps against the spread of conspiracy theories surrounding the Covid 19 outbreak. (...) All participants had assured that they wanted to make 'reliable news sources' more prominent, 'remove prohibited or harmful content' (...) (...) The tools developed in the code of conduct, According to Jourová, according to Jourová, the fact that unmasked 'fake accounts' and social bots should be switched off quickly and beneficiaries of false reports should have their advertising revenue withdrawn quickly. (…) Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg had publicly assured in parallel that decided to take action against incorrect information about the coronavirus ”(41).

Stefan Krempl, IT specialist magazine Heise Online

"'Corona is more of a head problem'. The flu currently poses a significantly higher risk than the corona virus, according to the doctor. 200 lives in Germany, a message from Thursday morning, had requested this in the first months of the year. 17,000 had already been infected in this country. Compared to the few hundred corona cases known in Germany, which mostly went off lightly, this was far worse. Nevertheless, there is a great deal of uncertainty among the population regarding the subject of corona, a 'huge noise', as Hable says ”(42).

Dr. Michael Hable, medical officer

"You cannot prevent the infection. The asymptomatic are just as virus-spreading as the symptomatic. (…) The symptomatic are actually less contagious than the asymptomatic, which are still in the incubation period.  (…) It is completely hopeless to want to protect against viral infection. That is why the measures that are being taken at the moment are completely absurd ”(43).

Dr. Claus Köhnlein, internist

“We could make a simple estimate of the IFR as 0.36% based on halving the lowest limit of the CFR prediction interval.  However, the considerable uncertainty about how many people suffer from the disease, the proportion of asymptomatic patients (and the demographics of those affected) means that this IFR is probably an overestimation. (...) In Iceland, where most tests were carried out per capita, the IFR is somewhere between 0.01% and 0.19%. Taking into account historical experience, trends in data, the increased number of infections in the largest population group and the potential effects of misclassification of deaths, a presumed estimate for the COVID-19 IFR is between 0.1% and 0.36% "(44).

Dr. Jason Oke, Professor Dr. Carl Heneghan, Oxford University, UK

“In every country, more people die from regular flu than from the corona virus. (…) What has stopped the swine flu pandemic and what does virus stop in general? Anyone who believes the government is killing viruses is completely wrong. What is really happening The virus, that no one can stop spreading in the population, and then the population, not the vulnerable, is exposed to the virus, and at the same time the body produces antibodies to switch off and prevent the disease. The virus is currently spreading in Israel by a very large number of people who do not know they have it, and people are exposed to the virus and become immune. The chain of infection is interrupted and the virus comes to a standstill ”(45).

Professor Dr. Yoram Lass, former director general of the Israeli Ministry of Health

"The only 'basis' of the completely absurd' corona floating in the fact-free vacuum Dizziness is the '5% IPS patient lie' - every primary school student knows that the ratio of IPS patients to sick people (ie those who test positive) of 1:20 aka 5% is in reality a factor of 100 or even lower because Although every IPS patient is tested, the least diseased, ergo less than 0.05%, and the 'corona dead Lies with which everyone knows what I know who died (random) carrier of ONE (PCR extremely sensitive) corona virus as AN COVID-19 deceased. This is the case in Italy and Germany, and because I never received an answer to my question to the BAG, probably also with us and everywhere else ”(46).

Dr. Thomas Binder, doctor, Switzerland

"As far as can be seen, the various exit restrictions were enacted by general decree, referring to Section 28 Infection Protection Act. Among the few lawyers who have spoken out publicly, it seems - and rightly so - the majority agree that they are all illegal. § 28 IfSG is already not a suitable legal basis - apart from the fact that the proportionality of some restrictions is also very doubtful. Therefore, in my opinion, an action against the general decree - or against the penalties or fines based on it - would have good prospects of success ”(47).

Dr. Jessica Hamed, criminal and constitutional lawyer

“In my opinion - and I have a lot in common with many other doctors - the virus is about the same danger as influenza. We see this in the death rates, which are around 0.3 to 0.7 percent. That's what we see with influenza. The course is similar. So it is a disease of the ear, nose and throat. This is an infection that is similar to influenza and is similarly contagious. (…) Measles are significantly more dangerous ”(48).

Professor Dr. Stefan Hockertz, immunologist and toxicologist

"The numbers of 20 or 50,000 corona infected, that are mentioned every day in different countries are utter nonsense. Not even 1 percent of the population has been tested using highly questionable tests. We don't know anything about the other 99 percent. A strong increase in flu symptoms was already noticed at the beginning of February.  They were probably already corona cases. Only it has not been tested. In any case, the current measures are not based on facts, but are an irrational overreaction ”(49).

Dr. Gerd Reuter, medical doctor

“In Italy, the number of deaths during the regular flu season is 20 times higher than that previously with Covid 19 died. How is it that we don't overload the intensive care units every year? Here are the data from Covid-19 in Italy, updated on March 10, 2020 at 6:00 p.m .: 8514 cases with 631 deaths. Note that this selection is chosen extremely selectively, as the tests are mainly performed on sick people.
The majority of experts, including Ilaria Capua, believe that asymptomatic cases are 10 to 100 times higher. Therefore, the mortality rate will not be 7.4%, but at least ten times lower. (…) These data confirm that we are still facing a panic epidemic and that the media are the main spreaders ”(50).

Dr. Leopoldo Salmaso from Italy specializes in infectious and tropical diseases as well as public health

"It is neither possible to demonstrate a significantly increased lethality of the virus, nor a pandemic course. For scientific reasons, in my opinion it is imperative to create a statistical study, to check the real danger of the situation. Politicians and the medical profession are in complete blind flight during the corona crisis - not a pandemic not proven there. This can and will cost human lives ”(51).

Dr. Richard Capek, medic

"This significantly overestimates the mortality from the disease, how much is unknown. So we have a muddle of terms that ultimately explains why we keep talking about infected people instead of positive people. The high numbers remain in memory, for example the mortality rate of 3.4% stated by the WHO. And that creates fear. (...) that we have to make sure that the media does not use the power of images to create emotions that affect our judgment. If you get pictures of coffins and death departments from Italy or pictures of completely empty shelves, then their effects exceed the facts mentioned ”(52).

Professor Dr. Gerd Bosbach, Professor of Statistics, Mathematics and empirical economic and social research and co-author of the well-known book "Lies with Numbers"

“I did a scientific study on chloroquine and viruses that was published thirteen years ago. Since then, four other studies by other authors have shown that the coronavirus responds to chloroquine.  None of this is new. It takes my breath away that the group of decision-makers doesn't even know about the latest science. We knew about the possible effect of chloroquine on cultured virus samples. It was known to be an effective antivirus ”(53).

Professor Dr. Didier Raoult is an infectious disease expert and runs a hospital in Marseille, France

"[Question: Professor Edenharter, are the current contact bans and exit restrictions covered by the Basic Law and the applicable laws?]  A clear no.  First of all, there is no suitable legal basis. In addition, regulations have been adopted in at least some federal states that disproportionately restrict the freedom rights of certain groups of people ”(54).

Professor Dr. Andrea Edenharter, legal professor


"[Quotes a colleague] In this context, I would like to point out that the RKI speaks out against post-mortems for reasons of infection protection! (...) So far, it was a matter of course for pathologists to take appropriate safety precautions, even with infectious diseases such as HIV / AIDS, hepatitis, tuberculosis, PRION diseases, etc. to autopsy.   Are you afraid of knowing the real causes of death for those who tested positive?  Could it be that the corona deaths would melt away like snow in the spring sun?  By the way, minimal or limited autopsies, as recommended by the RKI, are always problematic, because you can usually only find what you are looking for, but essential unexpected findings often go undetected ”(55).

Dr. Bodo Schiffmann, doctor

“If a virus does not kill itself or kill alone, but only in conjunction with other diseases, then you shouldn't blame the virus alone.  That this happens with COVID-19 is not only wrong, it is dangerously misleading.  Because you forget that many other factors - local factors - can play a decisive role. (…) I can only say: These measures are self-destructive and that if society accepts and carries them out, this is like a collective suicide ”(56).

Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, specialist in microbiology and infection epidemiology, former head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the University of Mainz

“Journalism that only parrots public statements without criticism has ended.
(…) Reading newspapers is fast at the moment. Two minutes, like in the GDR. Scroll once and you know that the government's opinion has not changed and neither has the media logic. Actually, I've already said everything about it. I wrote last week how journalism and politics have rocked each other at the imperative of attention, thereby creating a reality that can no longer be discussed by three people on the street. This is the death of the public, which cannot be revived online ”(57).

Professor Dr. Michael Meyen,
Professor of Communication Science at the LMU Munich

"According to the" Kurier "(Wednesday edition), the Salzburg internist Jochen Schuler spoke of" non-quantifiable medical collateral damage from the shutdown.   'There is currently a large number of patients who are not well cared for.  The usual ways in the health system are blocked for many, 'said Schuler. 'Many of us have the feeling that it will fly around our ears because the problems don't go away' '(58).

Dr. Jochen Schuler, doctor, Salzburg, Austria

"This suggests that the overall clinical outcomes of Covid-19 Ultimately, they are more similar to those of severe seasonal flu (with a death rate of around 0.1%) or pandemic flu (similar to those from 1957 and 1968) than to a disease such as SARS or MERS, in which the deaths were 9 to 10% or 36% were ”(59).

Dr. Anthony S. Fauci is an immunologist consultant to the US
Government in the fields of biohazards and infection with HIV and other viruses. Co-authors: Dr. H. Clifford Lane and Dr. Robert R. Redfield

“It is often said that if you now compare this corona virus with influenza, it is a trivialization. But that's not the case. So in Germany we have a very
very high disease burden from the influenza virus and also very, very many deaths. The worst influenza year in recent history in Germany was the winter of 2018. It was as a result that around 25,000 people died in Germany within a period of 8 weeks.  And if you imagine it now with a media accompaniment, as is common today with the corona virus, then it would be that we would get such reports every week: in the first week 100 people died in Germany, then there were 1000 people, then it was 5000 the next week, that's 8000, then the numbers slowly decrease again. That would be very, very dramatic if it were really accompanied by such media. With Corona we are very, very far away from this situation. Nevertheless, the fear that many have is far greater than it was in winter 2018 ”(60).

Professor Dr. Carsten Scheller is professor of virology at the University of Würzburg.

“400 people were reported in Styria alone because they did something wrong. And I already think 'wow'. We would not have let anyone offer us that recently, which is now forbidden to us.  You have to weigh it up: Is this medical risk, on the one hand, that we actually have, worth it, that we let all our freedoms be trampled on? Is that proportionate or not? I find this question important. Because of course: The fear patient always wants radical solutions. He wants total solutions.  The anxious patient wants this because he is afraid, he wants the virus away ”(61).

Dr. Raphael Bonelli, neuroscientist and psychologist, Austria

“Since Le Bon at the latest, mass psychology has taught us that, especially in times of crisis, people unite to form a uniform mass under the impression of a threat.  It does not matter whether the threat exists objectively, or is only perceived as such, or maybe just constructed. This extraordinarily powerful mass psychological mechanism works particularly well with a threat that is perceived as unknown, i.e. new. For example, a virus like the corona virus ”(62).

Harald Haas, psychologist, political scientist

"How does discrediting and disinformation work? (...) Strategy 1: The persons concerned are presented in a disparaging way (...) 2: Words are used around the term field 'lies' (...) 3: Arguments are not given specifically, but only hinted at and evaluated (...) 4: In the alleged contradiction, only perspectives or even confirmations are brought (...) 5: Contradictory or strange statements of the mainstream opinion remain unilluminated (...) 6: Arguments are brought up per government line, which - literally - are meaningless (...) 7: Statements by the person concerned are given incorrectly or not at all (...) However, as a linguist, I do see that there are filters and discourse patterns from journalists and lobbyists that are not very helpful for the discussion, because they hide the view of arguments ”(63).

Professor Dr. Joachim Grzega, linguist

"So far, the Robert Koch Institute and the Federal Government have avoided collecting and publishing the number of weekly corona tests in Germany. Instead, fear and panic were fueled by out of context case numbers. Official data now prove for the first time that the rapid increase in the number of cases essentially results from an increase in the number of tests ”(64).

Paul Schreyer, investigative journalist

"The actual number of coronavirus positives' can only be given after a serious epidemiological study," warns Gismondo.  She warns: 'The only reliable numbers today are those of patients who are treated in the sub-intensive care and intensive care units and those of deaths'. As a result, the virologist makes it clear: 'Today we can only talk about the percentage of deaths among hospitalized patients.  All other numbers are wrong 'and as such' they also distort people's impression '. It also has dangerous effects on the psyche. We conclude - according to Gismondo - that can change the trend of the measures taken and influence the behavior of the citizens ”(65).

Professor Dr. Maria Rita Gismondo, Microbiologist, Milan, Italy

“Consider the effects of the closure of offices, schools, transportation systems, restaurants, hotels, shops, theaters, concert halls, sporting events and other venues indefinitely and the related unemployment and unemployment of all of your employees.  The likely outcome would be not just depression, but a complete economic breakdown with countless jobs lost long before a vaccine is ready or natural immunity sets in. (...) advise people at higher risk,
protect yourself through physical distance and aggressively increase our healthcare capacity. With this battle plan, we could gradually build immunity without destroying the financial structure on which our lives are based ”(66).

Professor Michael T. Osterholm, Director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota

"I'm not a friend of lockdown. Anyone who imposes something like this must also say when and how to pick it up again. Since we have to assume that the virus will be with us for a long time, I wonder when do we return to normal? You can't keep schools and day care centers closed until the end of the year. Because it will take at least that long until we have a vaccine. Italy has imposed a lockdown and has the opposite effect. They quickly reached their capacity limits,
did not slow down the virus spread within the lockdown at all. A lockdown is a measure of political despair, because coercive measures mean that you can go further than the generation of reason ”(67).

Prof. Dr. Frank Ulrich Montgomery, President of the German Medical Association, Chairman of the World Medical Association

"[Oxford Study Report] Coronavirus' may have infected half of the UK population". The investigation suggests that the disease may have been common in the UK two months earlier than the first case was officially diagnosed.  (…) Should the results of the study prove correct, this would indicate that only one in every 1,000 infected patients will need hospital treatment and there is hope that the UK's 'lockdown' measures will be lifted earlier than planned could "(68).

Professor Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology, Oxford University

"[Interviewer: But COVID-19 is very contagious, doctor ...] Yes, like a cold - people die of it in old people's homes. So far you haven't counted them, but now you do. Last year there were more than 500,000 pneumonia worldwide.
In Africa, a million could be infected with meningitis, which is transmitted by spit - and the planes come and go. Nobody cares. There are 135,000 people infected with tuberculosis in Latin America, and none are upset. When someone makes a lot of noise about something like Corona ... I think it is all very dramatized.  From day one, I said the numbers were wrong - as was the case with swine flu back then ”(69).

Dr. Pablo Goldschmidt, virologist. Monaco, France and Argentina

“[Hamburger Morgenpost] Kindergartens and schools are to be opened again as soon as possible so that children and their parents can become infected through infection with the corona virus.  This is what the UKE infectionologist Dr. Ansgar Lohse in the 'Bild' newspaper. The continuation of the strict measures would lead to an economic crisis, which also costs human lives, according to the physician ”(70).

Professor Dr. Ansgar Lohse is clinical director of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)

“That fundamental rights are largely suspended for the entire population. That there are restrictions on other fundamental rights to the extent that they can only be exercised marginally. That so many fundamental rights are affected at the same time. And as I said, not for individual people, but for everyone in Germany.
(...) Indeed, it is frightening how people are intimidated by the use of suggestive images that create fear. We saw these coffins from Italy on TV and people are terrified and forget how much they loved freedom before, how much they thought it was important to be allowed to demonstrate in Germany and so on ”(71).

Professor Dr. Dietrich Murswick, professor of public law

“Personally, I would say the best advice is to spend less time watching television news that is sensational and not very good.  I personally consider this Covid outbreak to be a bad winter flu epidemic. In this case, we had 8000 deaths in the risk groups last year, i.e. over 65% people with heart disease etc. I don't think the current Covid will exceed that number. We are suffering from a media epidemic! ”(72).

Professor Dr. John Oxford from Queen Mary University of London, UK, a leading global virologist and influenza specialist

"COVID-19 has been called the pandemic of the century: 'It's a pandemic of the century'. And clear about what we see and hear and the mobilization and all the news and all the deaths, that we're witnessing ... Obviously it's a big threat. Or I would say a threat with unknown potential in terms of its ultimate impact.  At the same time, I call this - since it may be a one-time fiasco in a century - a proof fiasco (…) actions (…) some of them will do more harm than good ”(73).

Professor Dr. John Ioannisdis, Stanford University, USA

"It is important that the results that we present here suggest that ongoing epidemics in the UK and Italy started at least a month before the first reported death and have already led to the accumulation of significant levels of herd immunity in both countries.  There is an inverse relationship between the proportion of currently immune animals and the proportion of the population susceptible to serious diseases. This relationship can be used to determine how many people will need to be hospitalized (and possibly die) in the coming weeks if we are able to precisely determine the current level of herd immunity ”(74).

Jose Lourenco, Robert Paton, Mahan Ghafari, Moritz Kraemer, Craig Thompson, Peter Simmonds, Paul Klenerman, Sunetra Gupta, scientist from Oxford University, Great Britain

"So I can't answer my gnawing doubts, there doesn't seem to be anything special about this particular epidemic of flu-like illnesses. (...) Once the spotlight moves on, will there be serious and focused international efforts to understand the causes and origins of flu-like diseases and the life cycle of their pathogens? "(75).

Dr. Tom Jefferson, epidemiologist, Rome, Italy

“The same applies to all other statements in this Spiegel online report. Especially suspicious is that in 2009 the so-called 'swine flu' virus, also known as 'H1N1', would have triggered a pandemic with 150,000 deaths worldwide.
In fact, 'the great fear of the' swine flu pandemic 'was staged in the media,' 'as Ulrich Keil, professor of epidemiology and social medicine at the University of Münster, consultant to the World Health Organization (WHO) for decades and until 2002 chair of the European Region of the World Association of Epidemiologists IEA, rightly stated. 'That is forgotten today, since after the catastrophe that did not take place in Germany it was not worked out which mistakes were made in evaluating the H1N1 flu virus infection. The danger of the 'swine flu' was completely overestimated '' (76).

Professor Dr. Ulrich Keil, Epidemiologist from the University of Münster and former WHO advisor

"No more than 10 people will die from the novel coronavirus disease COVID-19 in Israel," said Nobel laureate Michael Levitt on Wednesday when the government continued to impose additional restrictions on the population. Levitt said Coronavirus fears in Israel are disproportionate to the threat, and the number of cases in the country is uncertain due to variations in reporting. 'I would be surprised if the number of deaths in Israel exceeded 10,' he said, adding that the Jewish state 'cannot be found on the world map regarding the disease' '”(77).

Professor Dr. Michael Levitt, Professor of Biochemistry, Stanford University, USA. Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2013

"In the current climate, anyone who has a positive test for Covid-19, the clinical staff who take care of him, will Certainly be known: If one of these patients dies, the staff must write the name Covid-19 on the death certificate - contrary to the usual practice for most infections of this type. There is a big difference between Covid-19, which causes death, and Covid-19 found in someone who died of other causes. If you make Covid-19 reportable, it could appear that it is causing more and more deaths, whether that's true or not. It could make it seem a lot more like a killer than a flu, simply because of the way how deaths are registered ”(78).

Professor Dr. Jon Lee, pathologist, Great Britain

“There is no significant risk of contracting the disease while shopping. Severe outbreaks of infection have always been the result of people being closer together for a longer period of time, such as the après Ski parties in Ischgl, Austria. He was also unable to find any evidence of "living" viruses on surfaces. 'When we took samples from doorknobs, telephones or toilets, it was not possible to cultivate the virus in the laboratory on the basis of these smears ...' '(79).

Professor Dr. Hendrick Streeck, Professor of Virology and Director of the Institute for Virology and HIV Research at the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn

“First of all, I would like to say that in 30 years of public health medicine, I have never seen anything like it, not even anything like it. I'm not talking about the pandemic, because I've seen 30 of them, one every year. It's called influenza. And other respiratory viruses, we don't always know what they are. But I've never seen this reaction before, and I'm trying to understand why. (…) Print,
that is exercised on public health doctors and those responsible for public health. And this pressure comes from different sides. The first place he came from was the Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO) when he said, 'This is a serious threat and a number one enemy of the state,' I have never heard of a WHO Director General using such terms ”(80).

Professor Dr. Joel Kettner, University of Manitoba, Canada

"In general, the current widespread idea is to be opposed, that health and life are a priori higher priorities than other constitutional goods in the necessary balancing decisions. Even if it is difficult: The basic right to life and physical integrity (Art. 2 Abs. 2 S. 1 GG) is subject to a simple legal reservation. In the interest of personal freedom, we do not force anyone to consent to postmortem organ donation even though people on the waiting lists die every day. Of course, a speed limit on the motorways and a ban on overtaking on country roads would mean that nine people would not die on Germany's streets every day; we don't do it because we (here in my opinion absurdly) weight mobile freedom higher than the protection of life ”(81).

Professor Dr. Thorsten Kingreen, public, social and health law, University of Regensburg

"The European 'mortality monitor', to which all deaths are reported weekly, even shows immortality at the moment.  The feared rush to the hospitals has also failed to materialize. Reliable data are therefore lacking, which justify the severity of the interventions. (...) This is undoubtedly the largest redistribution program ever in peacetime. Fortune knights and subsidy hunters will benefit
who are looking for gaps in the roughly knitted laws. Sectors such as delivery services or medical device manufacturers will also benefit, which you cannot blame for this. All others, especially transfer recipients and taxpayers, will lose. (…) In hindsight, we all have to pay for it ”(82).

Professor Dr. Stefan Homburg, the director of the Institute for Public Finance at Leibniz University in Hanover

“The CDC counts both real COVID-19 cases and speculative assumptions of COVID-19 equally. They call it death from COVID-19. They automatically overestimate the actual death toll, as they admit. Before COVID-19, it was more likely that people were given an exact cause of death on their death certificates when they died in the hospital. Why more precisely when a patient dies in the hospital? Because the hospital staff has laboratories for physical examination results, radiological studies, etc. to make a good educated guess.  It is estimated that 60 percent of people die in hospital. But even [in these] hospital deaths, the cause of death is not always clear, especially in someone with multiple health conditions, each of whom could cause death ”(83).

Dr. Annie Bukacek has been a doctor in the state of Montana, USA for 30 years

"The Federal Association of German Pathologists (BDP) and the German Society for Pathology (DGP) are calling for as many autopsies as possible from those who have died of corona. In doing so, they contradict the Robert Koch Institute's recommendation to avoid internal examinations in such cases.  On the contrary, it is necessary to gain further knowledge about the disease and its often astonishingly brilliant course and to answer open questions. In the best case, further therapy options could be derived from this - this is the value of the autopsy for the living, according to Prof. Dr. med. K.-F. Bürrig, President of the Federal Association. The autopsy is in the public interest and should not be avoided, on the contrary, it should be carried out as often as possible ”(84).

Professor Dr. med. K.-F. Bürrig is President of the Federal Association of German Pathologists (BDP)

"Already with the outbreak of the Marburg virus, with HIV, with SARS, MERS and BSE helped findings from pathology and neuropathology to understand clinical pictures and thus also influenced therapeutic concepts. This must also apply to COVID-19.

Prof. Dr. T. Welte directed by the German Center for Lung Research / DZL and Director of the Clinic for Pneumology and Infectious Medicine at the Hannover Medical School / MHH to the DGP ”(85).

"A register for COVID-19 autopsies in German-speaking countries is currently being set up at the Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen," said the chairman of the DGP, Prof. Dr. Gustavo Baretton. The autopsy information is collected in Aachen. The decentralized preservation of examination tissue ensures that it is available for special examinations. DGP and BDP are planning a quick transfer of knowledge not only within the field of pathology, but also to pulmonary specialists and intensive care physicians, and also to the responsible authorities ”(86).

Professor Dr. Gustavo Baretton is Chairman of the German Society for Pathology (DGP)

“'This virus affects our lives in a completely exaggerated way. This bears no relation to the danger posed by the virus. And the astronomical economic damage that is now occurring is the danger posed by the virus not appropriate.  I am convinced that corona mortality will not even make itself felt as a peak in annual mortality ... ’(…) So far, not a single person with no previous illness has died of the virus in Hamburg.  (...) There is no reason for fear of death in connection with the spread of the disease here in the Hamburg region, he says ”(87).

Professor Dr. Klaus Püschel is a forensic doctor and head of forensic medicine in Hamburg

"Child and adolescent psychiatrist Michael Schulte-Markwort told the newspaper: 'None of the numbers we know justifies the fear that is fueled in Germany by the virus. 'He has the impression that the fear is gradually becoming independent, that good news related to the virus is no longer perceived' (88).

Professor Dr. Michael Schulte Markwort is, among other things, the medical director of the Center for Psychosocial Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf.

"(...) the constitutional lawyer and former Federal Minister Rupert Scholz said that parts of it were unconstitutional. 'The situation in which we live has taken on an emergency-like character' (...) However, emergency legislation only exists in the case of a defense, but not a virus like Covid-19. In addition, the principle of proportionality must be observed in all laws. For Scholz, this is not the case, especially when it comes to the closure of hotels and restaurants.  According to Scholz, anyone who has had to close their restaurant without a proven infection is entitled to compensation ”(89).

Professor Dr. Rupert Scholz, constitutional lawyer

“Interestingly, the type B prevalent in Wuhan is not the original human virus type. But also in Wuhan comes type A, the original human virus genome, quite before. In this first phase of the outbreak, the A and C types were found in significant proportions outside of East Asia - among those affected in Europe, Australia and America. In contrast, the B type is the most common type in East Asia. (...) For example, it was initially assumed that the first northern Italian case of infection ('Patient One') had been infected by a certain Wuhan contact person from his circle of friends. But when this contact person was tested, it turned out that she didn't have the virus. The search for the Italian 'patient zero' thus ended in a dead end ”(90).

Dr. Michael Forster, Institute for Clinical Molecular Biology (IKMB) of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, and the Christian Albrechts University of Kiel (CAU), Dr. Peter Forster, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research at Cambridge University, et al.

"Aside from the corona virus, control and surgery dates postponed, 'collateral damage' would be threatened. In Vienna fewer patients with heart attack symptoms come to the hospitals. The Cardiological Society reported declining heart attacks in the previous week. 'But fewer patients are diagnosed with diagnosed heart failure.  These should definitely report if their condition worsens, 'said cardiologist Thomas Stefenelli, head of the 1st medical department at the Donauspital, vis-à-vis APA ”(91).

Professor Dr. Thomas Stefenelli, Head of the 1st Medical Department at Donauspital, Vienna, Austria

"'We are surprised that for Italy, one of the earliest and most severely affected EU countries, despite the outstanding researchers so far only a handful of Italian cases have been reported in the global COVID 19 case database GISAID ', adds Prof. Andre Franke "(92).

Professor Dr. rer. nat. Andre Franke, Institute for Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel

"'Persistent feelings of insecurity, fear and isolation create stress and are a risk factor for healthy people' (...) 'Former, severely affected corona patients, doctors and nurses may be traumatized during and after the crisis.' (...) 'In the therapies we work on that patients actively shape their daily structure and go among people, 'says Hauth. In the corona crisis, many patients are now isolated and feel lonely. Another problem is that many care offers are no longer available ”(93).

Dr. Iris Hauth, member of the board of the German Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, medical director of the Alexian St. Joseph Clinic in Berlin

“It becomes twice as interesting when it comes to the alleged immunity of people who have already survived an infection. That connects Gates to the issue of easing travel restrictions by saying: 'Ultimately, we will need a certificate for those who are either recovered or vaccinated because we don’t want people to travel anywhere in the world where there are countries that unfortunately (the virus) are not under control. You don't want to completely deprive these people of the opportunity to travel and come back.  ’And then there is the doubly interesting sentence: 'Therefore, there will finally be a kind of digital immunity document that will enable the global opening of the borders'' (94).

Dr. Norbert Häring, journalist and economist

"Can't understand the people in this country that they are seduced by people without any qualifications? Wieler is a veterinarian with no basic training in infectiology. Or Spahn, banker with no idea about illness and its origin,
let alone life and death? I do not want to talk about Drosten: He has seen or treated hardly any suffering patients in his life. And do these people determine what we can and shouldn't do? And threaten us so that every contradiction becomes a crime? I am shocked. Germany is thrown back 85 years ”(95).

Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, specialist in microbiology and infection epidemiology, former head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the University of Mainz

"For the epidemiologist Prof. Alexander Kekulé (61), known from 'Kekulés Corona Compass' (MDR), the matter is clear.  'We can't wait for a vaccine and live in lockdown mode for another six to twelve months. If we did that, our society and culture would be destroyed, '' he said in The Telegraph in the UK (96).

Professor Dr. rer. nat. Alexander S. Kekulé is director of the Institute for Medical Microbiology at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg

"'Data show that massive economic downturns also cost human lives in large numbers - the global economic crisis 2009 about half a million worldwide,' said the philosopher. So it is dangerous to stretch crises like the current one as far as possible in order to slow down the number of infections. 'That is not possible, we cannot do it,' he emphasized ”(97).

Professor Dr. Dr. h.c. Julian Nida-Rümelin, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich

“The Ouest France journalist tells the story of a video conference in the presence of a psychiatrist.  'Suddenly, in the middle of the video conference, in which several hundred emergency doctors come together, as if under a cold shower. Icy, even. The event did not make the headlines and did not even reach the doctors of the French CHU. '' We had a tendril who cut her throat.  Hospitalized in absolute emergency.  She thought she infected her husband, who had coughing fits.

 "Pierre Vidhailhet, psychiatrist at the University Clinic of Strasbourg (Bas-Rhin), whispered these words" (98).

"At the Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm, the situation in the Corona intensive care unit has become much calmer," said senior physician David Konrad to the public TV SVT. More and more patients are currently being discharged from the clinic, he says. And of the mostly old and seriously ill, those who were brought in with life-threatening symptoms would have survived well over 80 percent. 177 intensive care units were free for new patients over the weekend. 'There are many free places in the intensive care units in all Stockholm hospitals,' said the senior doctor. He currently looks after 127 corona patients.  Only around 'six to twelve' patients with more severe symptoms are added every day. 'We're getting closer to flattening the disease curve,' says Konrad ”(99).

Dr. David Konrad, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden

“215 pregnant women (…) were examined for symptoms of Covid-19 when they were admitted. Four women (1, 9%) had fever or other symptoms of Covid-19 on admission, and all four women tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (Figure 1). Of the 211 women without symptoms, all were fever-free when admitted. Nose-throat swabs were taken from 210 of the 211 women (99.5%) who had no symptoms of Covid-19; of these women, 29 (13.7%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Thus 29 of the 33 patients who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on admission (87.9%) had no symptoms of Covid-19 on presentation ”(100).

Dr. Desmond Sutton, Dr. Karin Fuchs, Dr. Mary D’Alton, Dr. Dena Goffman, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

“These protective measures could endanger us. You shouldn't be afraid of herd immunity. (...) If we talk about closing the economy for a week, it means we could build a fancy hospital with that money, and what does it mean
that we can't open this hospital? Even in the dry and careful numbers, I estimate that between 2,000 and 4,000 people in the country will die of the disease ”(101).

Professor Dr. Dan Yamin, director of the epidemic research laboratory at the University of Tel Aviv

“From the sixth week, the increase in the number of patients was moderate and peaked in the sixth week with 700 patients per day. Since then, it has been declining and there are now only 300 new patients. In two weeks she will reach zero and there will be no new patients (...) It is the same all over the world.
Both in countries where they have taken steps to close, such as Italy, and in countries where there have been no closures, such as Taiwan or Singapore. In these and those countries there is an increase up to the fourth to sixth week, and immediately thereafter a decrease until it disappears in the eighth week ”(102).

Professor Dr. Isaac Ben-Israel, President of the Israeli National Research Council

"However, what can already be transferred to Germany is the mortality rate among people with Coronavirus CoV-2 infections: Our results allow a fairly good estimate of the lethality in the order of 0.37 percent.  We were able to determine this well with a representative sample. Scientist Christian Drosten also said in the 'heute journal' that this value does not surprise him ”(103).

Professor Dr. Hendrick Streeck, Professor of Virology and Director of the Institute of Virology and HIV Research at the medical faculty of the University of Bonn

"'I assume that there will still be many legal disputes before the administrative courts on these issues.' There are great doubts that 'the regulations are formulated sufficiently'. This increases suspicion of arbitrariness.  In any case, the situation is completely new for the judiciary "(104).

Lawyer Lea Voigt, Chair of the Security Committee of the German Lawyers' Association (DAV)

“Because what is exaggerated are rare individual cases, and in some cases only indications, which on closer inspection pose no problem at all.  Cases have also been reported as “secondary infections”, in which the virus was detected again by means of PCR after a Covid-19 disease had healed, but without the persons again showing symptoms. It is therefore worthwhile if you first orientate yourself towards 'normal biology'.  And this is clear: We form neutralizing antibodies and thus immunity against virus infections - especially against beta coronaviruses, to which the SARS-CoV-2 belongs. (…) From what we know today, we can assume that an infection with Covid-19 leaves a normal antibody response with neutralizing antibodies and reasonable immunity ”(105).

Professor Dr. med. Pietro Vernazza, chief physician of infectiology at the St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, Switzerland

"The absolute risk of dying from COVID-19 was between 1, 7 per million for people under 65 in Germany and 79 per million in New York City. The absolute risk of dying from COVID-19 was between 1 in 6,000 in Germany and 1 in 420 in Spain for people aged ≥80 years. The risk of death for COVID-19 in people under the age of 65 during the period in which the epidemic was fatal corresponded to the risk of death with a mileage of between 9 miles per day (Germany) and 415 miles per day (New York City). Only 0.3%, 0.7% and 1.8% of all COVID-19 deaths in the Netherlands, Italy and New York City occurred in people under the age of 65, who had no predisposing underlying diseases ”(106).

Professor Dr. John Ioannidis, Stanford University, USA

“The population prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the Santa Clara district suggests that the infection is much more common than the number of confirmed cases suggests.  Population prevalence estimates can now be used to calibrate epidemic and mortality forecasts ”(107).

Professor Dr. Eran Bendavid (et al), Stanford University, USA

"Especially in Germany, no hospital is overwhelmed (...) Then I say the epidemic is over.  (...) The number of newly infected people in Europe has been falling for at least three days (A) (...) Getting immunity is the fastest way to let children get infected and that is how to protect the elderly from being infected ( ...) Measures have made the situation worse (...) Open the schools! There is none and there was never a reason to close schools ”(108).

Professor Dr. Knut Wittkowski from New York, USA, epidemiologist and biostatistician, (A: Interview from April 8th)

“Such apps are currently being discussed at European level. And that nicely shows the problem that we have already mentioned, from the transition to the new reality: the question how to proceed in the longer term after the lockdown. And how everything is compatible with our fundamental rights. It quickly becomes much more problematic than it is today. And such an app is indeed very problematic. Because it could be used to create 24-hour movement profiles of people.  Thus, the traceability of the infection chain would be possible. At the same time, you would actually have the same result as if you observed us all around the clock. With such serious violations of fundamental rights, it is up to the state to look for methods that may be a little less effective, but, in turn, affect the privacy of individuals much less ”(109).

Professor Dr. Markus Schefer is a professor of constitutional law and administrative law at the University of Basel, Switzerland

“The corona virus is a global threat to human health - and is causing life to spin. Professor Ulrich Keil, Epidemiologist from the University of Münster and former WHO advisor, compares the current epidemic with other epidemics. He calls for more serenity. (...) is of great concern these days ”(110).

Professor Dr. Ulrich Keil, epidemiologist from the University of Münster and former consultant to the WHO

“Corona shows that digital platforms may be important, but reality is still set by the leading media. The power lies with those who manage to place their version of reality in the Tagesschau, in the Süddeutsche Zeitung, in the mirror, in time, in the Bild newspaper. We saw what happens when government press releases become media reality, the big editorials howl with politicians, and their little followers brand every deviant on the web as a conspirator and health enemy. Approval rates as in North Korea ”(111).

Professor Dr. Michael Meyen, Professor of Communication Science at the LMU Munich

“Based on public and published information, we estimate that the overall symptomatic risk of death (likelihood of dying after developing symptoms) of COVID-19 in Wuhan was 1.4% (0.9-2.1%), which is significantly lower than both the corresponding raw or naive confirmed death risk (2,169 / 48,557 = 4.5%) and the approximator1 of deaths / deaths + recoveries (2,169 / 2,169 + 17,572 = 11%) as of February 29, 2020 ”( 112).

Professor Dr. Tsz Kei Joseph Wu (et al), Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hong Kong, China

"A scientifically founded discourse of all relevant medical societies B. ad hoc commission did not take place. Instead, virologists became media stars and political advisors who are now proclaiming the war against Corona (President Macron) or draconian measures for democracies.  (...) However, large parts of the medical societies agree immunologically, herd immunization by infection or vaccination is required to stop the pandemic.  (…) Experienced by the media, one stage of escalation after another, and are now faced with the restriction of democratically guaranteed fundamental rights without even leading the democratic social process of a discursive dialogue ”(113).

Professor Dr. med. Harald Matthes is the medical director of the Berlin Community Hospital Havelhöhe

“Autopsies on COVID-19 deceased patients are no more dangerous than other infectious deceased people, for example those infected with tuberculosis or HIV or hepathitis C. (...) Of course, the autopsy has to make a very important contribution - as they say - to clarify the correct cause of death. Whether you died of COVID or with COVID. It is also about better understanding this new clinical picture ”(114).

Professor Dr. Gustavo Baretton is Chairman of the German Society for Pathology (DGP)

“The pandemic psychosis opens up the possibility of creating a new totalitarian world order to save humanity. The fact that there are greater interests in generating or even using a mass delusion is immediately punished as a 'conspiracy theory'. (...) The fear of viruses only needs to be stirred up for a long time, for example by virus mutation or 'new' viruses, so that practically all emergency laws must continue. With the fear of infection and death, all protests and all counter evidence are nipped in the bud and all serious consequences, such as unemployment, bankruptcy, impoverishment, social hardship,
Severe mental and psychosocial illnesses, violence, are blamed on the viruses. The political and economic conditions and causes remain untouched ”(115).

Dr. Hans-Joachim Maaz, former chief physician of the clinic for psychotherapy and psychosomatic medicine in Halle and long-time chairman of the German Society for Analytical Psychotherapy and Depth Psychology

"To date, a large part of the hectically cleared intensive care beds in hospitals is empty. Word got around that the first predictions of an unchecked exponential spread of the allegedly completely new corona virus were far exaggerated. The all-clear is in the air, accompanied by warnings not to give up the contact block and isolation too quickly. But did they really help to avoid a medical disaster? Largely unnoticed data from the Robert Koch Institute suggest that the trend was reversed even before the toughest countermeasures such as school closings and ban on meetings. And that SARS-CoV-2 has only a partial role in the diseases in focus - like every year the different viruses for the flu season ”(116).

Dr. Johannes Wollbold, systems biologist and mathematician

“We should never have pressed the stop button.  Commentators and Monday trainers have to switch off the flashlight: The Danish health service has control over the situation. And the total shutdown was a step too far ”(117).

Professor Dr. Jens Otto Lunde Jörgensen, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Denmark

"Some of the water carriers of the new world government have already spill over: lifting the restrictions on fundamental rights would require that there be a vaccine or a drug against 'Covid-19'. The fact that the vast majority of those affected either don't get sick at all or manage the disease without any therapy,
unmask the threat of this announcement ”(118).

Dr. Gerd Reuther, university lecturer and specialist in radiology

“The epidemic reveals a second, no less disturbing fact: the state of emergency, which the governments have been attuning to us for some time, has become our normal state. There have been worse epidemics in the past than today, but no one had ever thought of declaring a state of emergency like the one now that even prevents us from moving freely. People have got used to living in conditions of constant crisis and emergency.  They do not seem to notice that their lives have been reduced to a purely biological function and that they have lost not only every social or political dimension, but also human or affective dimensions. A society that lives in a constant state of emergency cannot be a free society ”(119).

Professor Dr. Giorgio Agamben, Italy. Professor of philosophy at the Universities of Venice and Paris

"According to a new study by the RKI, the number of reproductions they called, which indicates how many new people are infected by an infected person ... dropped to below 1 before the lockdown. (...) If you look at the graphics, you can see (...) on the 20th March it drops below 1. Three days later the lockdown came. That was March 23. And if you look further now, you can see that the curve stays below 1 with minor fluctuations. It is not the case that after the lockdown the curve continues to go down. One can therefore conclude two things: 1.
The lockdown was not necessary because it [reproductive factor, number of reproductions] was already below 1, and 2. the lockdown was also not effective because it [reproductive factor, number of reproductions] did not decrease further due to the lockdown ”(120).

Professor Dr. Stefan Homburg, University of Hanover

“It is important that the doctors are heard.  But there are obviously situations (...) where doctors in the hospital and the official functions have been muzzled ”(121).

Dr. Stephan Rietiker, medical doctor, Switzerland

"The psychological principle that makes us afraid of swine flu, bird flu or COVID-19, but not common flu, means fear of the risk of fear. It is easy to instill fear of episodes in which many people die within a short interval, such as Airplane crashes or epidemics.  (...) For example, when swine flu spread, many governments followed the advice of the World Health Organization and hoarded Tamiflu, a drug that was put on the market to protect against the serious consequences of the flu. However, many WHO consultants have had financial ties to drug manufacturers and there is still no evidence that Tamiflu is effective ”(122).

Professor Dr. Gerd Gigerenzer is director of the Harding Center for Risk Competence at the University in Potsdam

“Suicides, social anger and legal complaints - epidemics such as those of SARS (2003 in China and Canada) and Ebola (2014 in West Africa) have already illustrated what can cause a quarantine in the people affected.  The potential benefits of such mandatory mass isolation must therefore be carefully weighed against the psychological disadvantages, emphasize Dr. Samantha K. Brooks from London’s King’s College and colleagues ”(123).

Dr. Samantha K. Brooks (et al), King's College, London, United Kingdom

"'We expect the Chancellor To be able to resume the drastically postponed hospital treatments. ’(...) Gass emphasizes: 'People are at risk of dying because they are not being treated in time because of corona.' There are 30 percent decline in occupancy rates in the clinics. Gass: 'We have 150,000 free hospital beds and around 10,000 free intensive care beds.' (...) In Berlin only 68 ITS beds are occupied by corona patients, 60 of whom are ventilated. This contrasts with 341 empty ITS beds. Gaß: 'The Berlin emergency clinic with 1000 beds in the exhibition halls is currently not needed' (124).

Dr. Gerald Gaß, President of the German Hospital Society

"Has SARS-CoV-2 fooled the whole world? (...) An IFR of 0.1%, which is probably a conservative number, indicates that everyone is already infected. This implies that SARS-CoV-2 spread quickly before almost everyone was aware of it. It is therefore likely that the virus is airborne.  I urge the world to get away from the barriers quickly and orderly and to develop sensible approaches to fighting the disease without causing further economic misery. It may be difficult to do this, but the cure is currently far worse than the disease ”(125).

Professor Dr. Mikko Paunio, Epidemiologist, University of Helsinki, Finland

"I think what we see is a tsunami of an ordinary mild illness that sweeps across Europe and some countries do it and some countries do it and some countries don't and in the end there will be very small differences (... ) Most people who get it will not even notice that they are infected ”(126).

Professor Dr. Johan Giesecke, epidemiologist, Sweden

Sources and notes:

(1) http://blauerbote.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/120-Expertenstimmen-zu-Corona.pdf
(2) https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/10-38-RKI-meldet-Rekordzahl-von-4500-Genesenen-binnen-24-Stunden--article21626512.html
(3) https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/doedelighed-skal-formentlig-taelles-i-promiller-danske-blodproever-kaster-nyt-lys
(4) https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/nobel-laureate-israel-will-have-no-more-than-ten-coronavirus-deaths-621407
(5) https://novuscomms.com/2020/03/31/a-view-from-the-hvivo-open-orphan-orph-laboratory-professor-john-oxford/
(6) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/die-stimme-der-vernunft
(7) https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/covid-19-scharfe-kritik-an-ard-und-zdf-wegen.2849.de.html?drn:news_id=1117133
(8) https://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=59903
(9) https://cemsiis.meduniwien.ac.at/ms/
(10) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/warnende-experten
(11) http://www.matthias.schrappe.com/einzel/thesenpapier_corona.pdf
(12) https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1375
(13) https://vitalstoff.blog/2020/04/06/social-distancing-mehr-tote/#more-1885
(14) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtzHH8DhgZM&feature=emb_title
(15) https://www.rundschau-online.de/news/aus-aller-welt/folgen-der-corona-krise-anstieg-von-depression-und-suizid-befuerchtet-36473480
(16) https://www.ruhr24.de/ruhrgebiet/coronavirus-behandlung-intensivstation-nrw-lungenentzuendung-matthias-thoens-witten-zr-13645038.html
(17) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYWWvSTQkNI&feature=emb_title
(18) https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464
(19) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsExPrHCHbw&feature=emb_title
(20) https://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/gesundheit/coronavirus/neue-corona-symptome-entdeckt-virologe-hendrik-streeck-zum-virus-16681450.html
(21) https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/coronavirus-epidemiologe-folgen-helmholtz-100.html
(22) https://www.cicero.de/aussenpolitik/corona-pandemie-schweden-skifahren-staatsepidemiologe-anders-tegnell/plus
(23) http://beatebahner.de/lib.medien/aktualisierte%20Pressemitteilung.pdf
(24) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/im-schatten-der-pandemie
(25) https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30110-7/fulltext
(26) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-inX5GZkH_M&feature=youtu.be
(27) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFg5rcNNGNo
(28) https://www.wodarg.com/app/download/8945158814/+20200225+Corona+Artikel+WW.pdf?t=1583011485
(29) https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/20/opinion/coronavirus-pandemic-social-distancing.html
(30) https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/former-supreme-court-justice-this-is-what-a-police-state-is-like-
(31) https://www.cybermednews.eu/index.php/it/health/70871-interview-to-the-virologist-giulio-tarro-the-death-rate-of-covid-19-is-less-than-1-as-confirmed-by-the-national-institute-of-allergy-and-infectious-diseases
(32) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/have-many-coronavirus-patients-died-italy/
(33) https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
(34) https://www.deadlymedicines.dk/corona-an-epidemic-of-mass-panic/
(35) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/die-panikmacher
(36) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920300972#!
(37) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/die-folgen-verraten-die-absicht
(38) https://www.watson.ch/!397549523
(39) https://www.focus.de/gesundheit/ratgeber/erkaeltung/36-000-infizierte-57-tote-waehrend-alle-von-corona-reden-vergessen-wir-die-grippe_id_11635572.html
(40) https://kenfm.de/tagesdosis-18-3-2020-der-corona-pandemie-wahn-wer-bin-ich-in-einer-traumatisierten-gesellschaft/
(41) https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Coronavirus-EU-aktiviert-erstmals-Fruehwarnsystem-gegen-Desinformation-4676943.html
(42) https://www.mz-web.de/wittenberg/gesundheit-in-wittenberg-amtsarzt---corona-ist-mehr-ein-kopf-problem--36372952
(43) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYGgmBDqR4M
(44) https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/global-covid-19-case-fatality-rates/
(45) https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-lockdown-lunacy-1001322696
(46) https://www.vimentis.ch/d/dialog/readarticle/hat-unsere-regierung-ganz-schoen-einen-am-straeusschen/
(47) https://www.fr.de/politik/coronakrise-deutschland-kontaktsperre-koennte-rechtswidrig-sein-13611821.html
(48) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wfb-B0BWmo&feature=emb_title
(49) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/die-desinformations-pandemie
(50) https://www.theblogcat.de/uebersetzungen/interview-mit-italienischem-arzt-16-03-2020/
(51) https://coronadaten.wordpress.com/
(52) https://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=59617
(53) https://linkezeitung.de/2020/03/26/medikament-gegen-corvid-19-erfolgreich-testkits-bei-amazon/
(54) https://www.rnd.de/politik/corona-krise-verfassungswidrige-eingriffe-in-freiheitsrechte-G76RET6PG5HHLAXJ2JZZF6PYNM.html
(55) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSn_YaOYYcY&feature=emb_title
(56) https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=40&v=JBB9bA-gXL4&feature=emb_title
(57) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/kniefall-vor-der-macht
(58) https://wien.orf.at/stories/3044064
(59) https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMe2002387?articleTools=true
(60) https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=17&v=w-uub0urNfw&feature=emb_title
(61) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ2hv7duVpQ&feature=emb_title
(62) https://www.addendum.org/coronavirus/harald-haas-interview/
(63) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/der-corona-diskurs
(64) https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/coronavirus-irrefuhrung-fallzahlen
(65) https://www.secoloditalia.it/2020/03/coronavirus-la-gismondo-ammonisce-duramente-basta-snocciolare-numeri-sui-positivi-sono-dati-falsati/
(66) https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/21/facing-covid-19-reality-national-lockdown-is-no-cure/
(67) https://www.general-anzeiger-bonn.de/news/politik/deutschland/interview-mit-weltaerztepraesident-montgomery-ueber-corona-pandemie-ist-chaos_aid-49609561
(68) https://metro.co.uk/2020/03/24/coronavirus-may-already-infected-half-uk-population-12451012/
(69) https://www.infobae.com/coronavirus/2020/03/28/para-un-prestigioso-cientifico-argentino-el-coronavirus-no-merece-que-el-planeta-este-en-un-estado-de-parate-total/#
(70) https://www.mopo.de/hamburg/uke-infektiologe-fordert-es-muessen-sich-mehr-menschen-mit-corona-infizieren-36483636?fbclid=IwAR2rlzb8IO4W96Vydl6_4cEMvNAMoAEFFlpV6N9KDQwTkHnehoDLzNutz4Y
(71) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d6hPaGmXw0&feature=emb_title
(72) https://novuscomms.com/2020/03/31/a-view-from-the-hvivo-open-orphan-orph-laboratory-professor-john-oxford/
(73) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6MZy-2fcBw&feature=emb_title
(74) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.24.20042291v1
(75) https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/03/02/tom-jefferson-covid-19-many-questions-no-clear-answers/
(76) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/journalismus-am-ende-2
(77) https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/nobel-laureate-israel-will-have-no-more-than-ten-coronavirus-deaths-621407
(78) https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think
(79) https://today.rtl.lu/news/science-and-environment/a/1498185.html
(80) https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/17/listen-cbc-radio-cuts-off-expert-when-he-questions-covid19-narrative/
(81) https://verfassungsblog.de/whatever-it-takes/
(82) https://www.rundblick-niedersachsen.de/finanz-professor-das-ist-das-groesste-umverteilungsprogramm-in-friedenszeiten/
(83) https://www.zerohedge.com/health/whistleblower-how-cdc-manipulating-covid-19-death-toll
(84) https://www.pathologie.de/aktuelles/bdp-pressemitteilungen/bv-pressemitteilungen-detailansicht/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=1672&cHash=b566f545e6aa47c5dd22ffe1f70e032e
(85) https://www.pathologie.de/aktuelles/bdp-pressemitteilungen/bv-pressemitteilungen-detailansicht/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=1672&cHash=b566f545e6aa47c5dd22ffe1f70e032e
(86) https://www.pathologie.de/aktuelles/bdp-pressemitteilungen/bv-pressemitteilungen-detailansicht/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=1672&cHash=b566f545e6aa47c5dd22ffe1f70e032e
(87) https://www.mopo.de/hamburg/rechtsmediziner--ohne-vorerkrankung-ist-in-hamburg-an-covid-19-noch-keiner-gestorben--36508928
(88) https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/10-38-RKI-meldet-Rekordzahl-von-4500-Genesenen-binnen-24-Stunden--article21626512.html
(89) https://www.focus.de/finanzen/recht/staatsrechtler-teile-der-gesetze-verfassungswidrig-focus-verfassungsrechtler-erwarten-klagewelle-gegen-covid-19-gesetze-der-regierung_id_11870800.html
(90) https://www.uksh.de/pi_20200409_genetischen_Urspruengen_des_Coronavirus_auf_der_Spur+-path-13576,9874,13830,182668.html
(91) https://wien.orf.at/stories/3044064
(92) https://www.uksh.de/pi_20200409_genetischen_Urspruengen_des_Coronavirus_auf_der_Spur+-path-13576,9874,13830,182668.html
(93) https://www.rundschau-online.de/news/aus-aller-welt/folgen-der-corona-krise-anstieg-von-depression-und-suizid-befuerchtet-36473480
(94) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/die-corona-dystopie
(95) https://www.nachrichtenspiegel.de/2020/04/16/wenn-uns-nicht-bald-ein-licht-aufgeht-koennte-es-sehr-dunkel-werden-kommentar-von-prof-sucharit-bhakdi/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NachrichtenspiegelOnline+%28Der+Nachrichtenspiegel%29
(96) https://www.express.de/news/panorama/virologe-stellt-these-auf-schaden-durch-lockdown-groesser-als-durch-corona-36548638
(97) https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/bayern/Philosoph-Nida-Ruemelin-plaediert-fuer-raschen-Exit-aus-Kontaktsperren-id57208696.html
(98) https://www.midilibre.fr/2020/04/09/coronavirus-ces-suicides-de-malades-ou-de-personnes-tenaillees-par-langoisse,8839373.php
(99) https://swprs.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/volksblatt_schweden_corona_20200414_18.pdf
(100) https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2009316
(101) https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-5714371,00.html
(102) http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/278658
(103) https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/virologe-streeck-zur-coronavirus-studie-die-veroeffentlichung-zu-heinsberg-war-nicht-leichtfertig/25735672.html
(104) https://www.focus.de/finanzen/recht/staatsrechtler-teile-der-gesetze-verfassungswidrig-focus-verfassungsrechtler-erwarten-klagewelle-gegen-covid-19-gesetze-der-regierung_id_11870800.html
(105) https://infekt.ch/2020/04/hinterlaesst-coronavirus-eine-immunitaet/
(106) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.05.20054361v1
(107) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20062463v1
(108) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARTf4bpiXuI
(109) https://www.republik.ch/2020/04/17/wir-haben-ihn-so-geliebt-den-rechtsstaat
(110) https://www.muensterschezeitung.de/Lokales/Staedte/Muenster/4180189-Appell-zu-Gelassenheit-und-Augenmass-Professor-stellt-Corona-Massnahmen-infrage
(111) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/das-ende-einer-ara-2
(112) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0822-7
(113) https://www.zeitpunkt.ch/starke-worte-eines-erfahrenen-arztes-und-wissenschaftlers
(114) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHAij0flUKo&feature=youtu.be
(115) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/die-corona-religion
(116) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/fatale-manipulation
(117) https://jyllands-posten.dk/debat/breve/ECE12074246/vi-skulle-aldrig-have-trykket-paa-stopknappen/
(118) https://www.rubikon.news/artikel/die-gesundheits-diktatur
(119) https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/giorgio-agamben-ueber-das-coronavirus-wie-es-unsere-gesellschaft-veraendert-ld.1547093
(120) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy-VuSRoNPQ&feature=emb_title
(121) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eU6IdglI-wc
(122) https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/greater-risk-literacy-can-reduce-coronavirus-fear-by-gerd-gigerenzer-2020-03
(123) https://www.medical-tribune.de/medizin-und-forschung/artikel/coronavirus-quarantaene-kann-mit-massiven-psychischen-folgen-verbunden-sein/
(124) https://www.bz-berlin.de/deutschland/kliniken-verband-schlaegt-alarm-wegen-corona-regeln
(125) https://lockdownsceptics.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/How-the-World-got-Fooled-by-COVID-ed-2c.pdf
(126) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfN2JWifLCY