Ingredients in Vaccines: Mercury, Aluminum (spelled Aluminium in Europe), egg protein, Formaldehyde, MSG, squalene, glyphosate (the stuff in Roundup), gelatin, Polysorbate 80, aborted human fetal tissue, viruses and retroviruses, glutaraldehyde, sodium borate, L-histidine, lactose, bovine-derived material, Neomycin, mannitol, sorbitol, 2-phenoxyethanol, phenol, borax, monkey (kidney), cow (heart), calf (serum), chicken (embryo and egg), duck (egg), pig (blood), sheep (blood), dog (kidney), horse (blood), rabbit (brain), guinea pig, large foreign proteins, latex, bacteria and their toxins, mycoplasma, GMO yeast, foreign DNA, etc. Plus contaminants, including lead.
To see more about the above ingredients, go to this Link. The amount of aluminum alone should be a cause for concern. The effects are a lot worse when mixed with lead and mercury. I have seen some ridiculous articles comparing the above ingredients with the constituents of bananas and blueberries. First, you're not injecting them (I hope), and second, if your fruit contains the above ingredients, you better find a new supplier.
I'm not even sure the best way to approach the side effects listed (from VAERS plus the package insert that comes with the vaccine) as many of them are unknown because there are no studies of multiple vaccines given at once and no long-term studies, so no doubt this list will not be all of the possible or probable side effects but here are some of them:
Brain Inflammation/Acute Encephalopathy
Chronic Nervous System Dysfunction
Anaphylaxis
Febrile Seizures
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Brachial Neuritis;
Acute and Chronic Arthritis
Thrombocytopenia
Smallpox, polio, measles and varicella zoster vaccine strain infection
Death
Shock and “unusual shock-like state”
Protracted, inconsolable crying
Syncope
Deltoid Bursitis
asthma
atopy
allergy
autoimmunity
autism
learning disorders
communication disorders
developmental disorders
intellectual disability
attention deficit disorder
disruptive behavior disorder
tics and Tourette’s syndrome
seizures
febrile seizures
epilepsy
pronounced swelling redness, heat or hardness at injection site that continues for days or weeks
body rash or hives
shock/collapse
unresponsiveness, prolonged deep sleep;
high pitched screaming (may include arching of back)
hours of persistent, inconsolable crying
high fever (over 103 F)
respiratory distress (difficulty breathing)
twitching or jerking of the body, arm, leg or head
rolling or crossing of eyes
severe head or neck pain
joint pain or muscle weakness
disabling fatigue
loss of memory and mental skills
paralysis of any part of body
changes in sleep/wake pattern and dramatic personality changes
lack of eye contact or social withdrawal
loss of ability to roll over, sit up or stand up
head banging or unusual flapping, rubbing, rocking, spinning
onset of chronic ear or respiratory problems (including asthma)
severe/persistent diarrhea or chronic constipation
excessive bruising, bleeding or anemia
other serious loss of physical, mental or emotional wellness
The above list comes from NVIC, VAERS, vaccine inserts, etc. There are a list of 49 references on the NVIC site.
Now that you know about the above, does it make sense to get vaccinated under the current conditions? Or will you believe those who push (aka - profit from) vaccines and tell you how good they are for you? Or how safe they are for you? They will tell you only 1 out of a million will get side effects. Go to VAERS like I did. This is what I found: there have been over 60,000 deaths (perhaps much higher) in VAERS (where less than 1 in 10 actually gets reported according to CDC, maybe as little as 1 in 100 - I've multiplied by just a factor of 10), E.R. visits - over 2 million, Hospitalized - over 600,000, Life-Threatening - over 110,000, and Disabled - over 82,000. These numbers are for the years 2000 - 2015! When you do the math, it's 1 out of 100 that suffer side effects. Then again, if only 1% gets reported to VAERS (instead of 10%), then it's 1 out of every 10 people who will get a side effect (including death). And they don't even know the long-term side effects!
So, without doing any hardcore investigations, without looking at all the corrupt studies done by the vaccine companies, without even using logic and commons sense, these numbers should scare the hell out of you. Possible long-term side effects include cancer, Alzheimers, dementia, Parkinson's, diabetes, etc.
Keep in mind that one comparative study that I just discovered showed that there was a 5X greater mortality rate in vaccinated vs unvaccinated. Vaccinate under these current conditions? Go ahead if it makes you happy, just don't push or force others to get these toxic injections.
Wednesday, August 15, 2018
Monday, August 13, 2018
Distracted Driving vs Vaccines, Mortality, and the Media
The other night on the evening news they had about a 3-4 minute segment on distracted driving and stated that it kills around 9 people every day. What they never talk about is how many people are killed by vaccines every day - at least four times as many, perhaps as high as 40 times as many. Not a single negative story ever about vaccines. Why? Most of their revenue comes from those same drug companies in the form of all those drug ads you see. The point is that distracted driving is bad but vaccines are worse.
Vaccines injure a lot more than they kill. As the number of vaccines goes up, the problems go up. By checking official statistics and comparing the outcomes, this becomes obvious.
Here is a link to WHO where you can click on any country to see their vaccine schedule (as well as a lot of other information) - Country Vaccine Schedules. Just double-click on the country name.
Here is a LINK to a PDF file showing the number of vaccines given by country and comparing their mortality rates (the U.S. gives the most vaccines and has the highest mortality rates for children under 5 years old) as well as ranks for mortality rates; plus autism rates comparing 9 countries (the U.S. had the most in 2006 at 1 in 150 - it's now about 1 in 50). This report is from 2006 - the number of vaccines has since gone up and will no doubt continue going up in line with the rates of autism.
And here is a link to the U.S. vaccine schedule from birth to 18 years old: Vaccine Schedule.
Here are the results from a study I just found: "DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.
It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections."
No studies have been done on any other vaccines looking to see if this problem is widespread. There have been studies that show if you get the flu vaccine every year, you increase your chances of contracting other upper respiratory infections.
Don't forget that this is in addition to the deaths and injuries directly resulting from the vaccine itself.
The above links are all from easy to find resources online. As you may know, there are almost no comparison studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals (aside from the link above). However, by checking the above links, it can be seen that the fewer vaccines that are given, the lower the mortality rate and the lower the autism rates. The facts are already in existence and you can easily compare the outcomes.
But wait, there's more - if you still believe that vaccines don't cause autism and that the science is settled, you need to read This! It's about the study that supposedly showed vaccines don't cause autism. The chart in that link also lists most of the ingredients that are injected with the vaccines. It doesn't show the contaminants. All of the above leads to one conclusion - Vaccines do cause autism, brain damage, autoimmune disorders, death, and this list goes on and on. The evidence is overwhelming. You'll never see it in the mainstream media (MSM).
Paraphrased from the Terminator - Kyle Reese:
"Listen, and understand. The vaccinator is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are vaccinated." Vaccines and those who make them are Terminators for thousands of children. Everyone needs to be Kyle Reese and fight back because the vaccinators will not stop.
Vaccines injure a lot more than they kill. As the number of vaccines goes up, the problems go up. By checking official statistics and comparing the outcomes, this becomes obvious.
Here is a link to WHO where you can click on any country to see their vaccine schedule (as well as a lot of other information) - Country Vaccine Schedules. Just double-click on the country name.
Here is a LINK to a PDF file showing the number of vaccines given by country and comparing their mortality rates (the U.S. gives the most vaccines and has the highest mortality rates for children under 5 years old) as well as ranks for mortality rates; plus autism rates comparing 9 countries (the U.S. had the most in 2006 at 1 in 150 - it's now about 1 in 50). This report is from 2006 - the number of vaccines has since gone up and will no doubt continue going up in line with the rates of autism.
And here is a link to the U.S. vaccine schedule from birth to 18 years old: Vaccine Schedule.
Here are the results from a study I just found: "DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.
It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections."
No studies have been done on any other vaccines looking to see if this problem is widespread. There have been studies that show if you get the flu vaccine every year, you increase your chances of contracting other upper respiratory infections.
Don't forget that this is in addition to the deaths and injuries directly resulting from the vaccine itself.
The above links are all from easy to find resources online. As you may know, there are almost no comparison studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals (aside from the link above). However, by checking the above links, it can be seen that the fewer vaccines that are given, the lower the mortality rate and the lower the autism rates. The facts are already in existence and you can easily compare the outcomes.
But wait, there's more - if you still believe that vaccines don't cause autism and that the science is settled, you need to read This! It's about the study that supposedly showed vaccines don't cause autism. The chart in that link also lists most of the ingredients that are injected with the vaccines. It doesn't show the contaminants. All of the above leads to one conclusion - Vaccines do cause autism, brain damage, autoimmune disorders, death, and this list goes on and on. The evidence is overwhelming. You'll never see it in the mainstream media (MSM).
Paraphrased from the Terminator - Kyle Reese:
"Listen, and understand. The vaccinator is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are vaccinated." Vaccines and those who make them are Terminators for thousands of children. Everyone needs to be Kyle Reese and fight back because the vaccinators will not stop.
Thursday, August 9, 2018
Vaccines, Fake News, and Snopes
A friend of mine commented about truth and the news (truth in the news would be a great concept!) and mentioned Snopes as a place to check facts. I mentioned I would never trust Snopes as they have given misinformation about vaccines. As soon as I mentioned that, someone said, "oh, so you're anti-vaccine."
I said no, I am pro-choice, pro-freedom, anti unsafe vaccines, anti (against) human experimentation (no long-term studies have ever been done on vaccines and no studies have ever been done on multiple vaccines given at the same time, so if you get vaccinated, you are being experimented on). Then a few people and I went back and forth about research. I told one of them to Google VAERS and CDC to see that vaccines kill more people than the diseases they are supposed to prevent. He replied:
"Nope. Don’t tell me to google or go someplace to research. You made the claim, show me the evidence. The burden is on he who makes the claim. You can’t rest on a generic tome about critical thinking hoping that inference that I don’t employ it sticks. It doesn’t. Where’s your evidence that vaccines kill more people that they prevent getting diseases?"
Since it is your health that you should be concerned with, it should be up to you to do all you can to keep your health, and that would include doing your own research, much as I have done. If you don't want to, that's okay with me, but don't expect me to do it for you.
He found VAERS as well as the CDC's disclaimer that the reports are not proven associations (you could say the same about vaccines by the same reasoning - that they are not proven to prevent disease. - the old "correlation does not equal causation." They only use that one when it's in their favor. I told him the CDC buys and sells $4 billion a year in vaccines, so of course, they'll put a disclaimer in there. Why would they even have VAERS if the reports to it weren't reliable? I should have added that the vaccine court (NVIC) has paid out over $4 billion for injuries including death. He probably would have said those injuries weren't proven, too. As I always say, use common sense and logic when investigating things. Unfortunately, only 1-10% of adverse events even get reported to VAERS. It was becoming obvious that he had done no research on vaccines and was probably relying on the fake news media (including Snopes since this is what started this exchange).
Next, this comment came out of the blue (there had been no prior mention of "herd immunity);" where did this remark come from? "For someone who extols research and critical thinking about vaccines he’s clearly never heard of herd immunity. Anyway. Claims require proof and extreme claims require extreme proof. Or we are free to ignore your claim."
Of course, he is free to ignore whatever claim anyone makes. However, it would be wise to investigate the claim since it may well affect his health and well being. But that is totally up to him.
I posted two links for him about the myth of herd immunity and why it can't possibly work. Here is one of those: Herd Immunity. Just knowing that vaccine protection, when it works, lasts only from 2 - 10 years is enough to tell you most of the adult population in the U.S. is no longer protected from vaccine diseases, thus no "herd immunity."
In his next comment below, he missed the point - Using measles as an example - No One is dying from measles even though less than half the population has any vaccine protection. Vaccines have absolutely nothing to do with any of the unvaccinated not dying, or even getting the disease.
Next, this comment:"His pitch (referring to me as if I was pitching something, which I wasn't - I was trying to introduce them to some factual research and get them to do some research) seems to be that in raw numbers vaccine deaths outnumber disease deaths. Then another one said, "He's ignoring the overwhelming number of people prevented from dying, as Charlie points out."
So I told him vaccines were not responsible for the decrease in deaths from all those diseases and to look at graphs of those diseases from the late 1800s or so to the present and check when the vaccines were introduced. I also mentioned that Scarlet Fever had no vaccine and followed the same slope down in the graph. And attached this graph to make it easy for them to follow things:
It's sad that people don't check actual facts and instead rely on what they hear in the media or from those who profit from vaccines. What those who promote vaccines do it pick specific years for their charts so it appears vaccines made a huge difference, usually a few years before the vaccine came out and after a spike up in cases.
Next, I added the below link to another article about the myth of herd immunity (the link has lots of other information so they could start on their own research. It is part of a 12 part series with links to each of the 12 parts at the bottom of the page. It has links to studies supporting what they say. Of course, anyone is always free to check on what they say (as I did when I began my research. Enjoy! Herd Immunity and More. To this information, the FB guys said the following (unbelievable, I know - it showed me they had no interest in doing the research or of learning the truth):
The first guy said this about the link: "but it's got 12 parts! It has to be authoritative. 12, not 11!" (nothing like a little sarcasm instead of actually doing some research). Then the other guy said, "I think I'll choose to believe history, science and the experts over ad hoc conspiracy." Considering he chose not to learn these things or research history, science and the experts, he illustrates the last line from my favorite quote - "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind."
And one of his final comments: "Sorry, but I find discussions with conspiracy theorists a pointless waste of my time. Have a nice day."
That is what people who don't do the research say. They will put labels on those who did the research calling them conspiracy theorists, anti-vaxxers, quacks, etc., probably in an attempt to hide their ignorance and lack of research or knowledge regarding vaccines. Then one of them said (now this is funny, or perhaps sad because I had shown him lots of facts), "I can see why you hate facts about vaccines, then."
It's pathetic that those who don't do the research and refuse to read links provided in order to learn something meaningful. I finished with the following.
Not facts (referring to what he said about "facts") if you do the actual research. from INDEPENDENT SOURCES including doctors, scientists, immunologists, virologists, etc. And I supplied the links from my last post (I'm guessing around 200 of them, although I doubt they'll check any. Then said I was done commenting on that thread, and bye bye. There was no point to continue.
It seems some people can't handle the truth, are brainwashed by the media, are making a profit from vaccines, don't want to take the time to learn the truth, or ? Maybe someone else will find some of the links useful and the pro-choice pro-freedom people (isn't that what the U.S. is supposed to be?) will gain another knowledgeable person. If someone learns the dangers of vaccines and it saves even one person, it will have been worth it.
If some of you wonder why I bother with this - seeing and reading about the countless lives destroyed or ended (mostly children) because of vaccines, and all the lies told, I can't sit by and do nothing. The past 30 years I have spent my life helping others with their health. As long as I can I will continue to share what I have learned through research and share that knowledge. Some people, like those above, will doubtfully ever change for whatever reason. Or perhaps they will when a catastrophic vaccine reaction happens to them or someone they know. That's sad. With all the above said, I don't want anyone to listen to me - I want everyone to do the research from (and this is IMPORTANT!!!) Independent Sources as I have done.
So far, I've only researched vaccines related to people. Many years ago when I was growing up, I had dogs as did many of the people I knew. None of the dogs ever got cancer. Now I know of several dogs with, or that have died from, cancer. I started wondering why. Unlike they do with autism, they can't say that they never noticed it before (which isn't true about autism either). What changed is that they are now giving dogs a lot more vaccines. If you're a dog owner, please do yourself a favor and read this article. It may save you money and save your dog, too. I'm wondering - if the vaccines are the cause of the dogs cancers, what's going to happen to all the people who have had their 70+ vaccines as they grow older? Remember, you can't unvaccinate.
In an upcoming blog, I'll be sharing some more links about vaccines and autism rates and mortality, comparing the number of vaccines in several countries and their outcomes.
I said no, I am pro-choice, pro-freedom, anti unsafe vaccines, anti (against) human experimentation (no long-term studies have ever been done on vaccines and no studies have ever been done on multiple vaccines given at the same time, so if you get vaccinated, you are being experimented on). Then a few people and I went back and forth about research. I told one of them to Google VAERS and CDC to see that vaccines kill more people than the diseases they are supposed to prevent. He replied:
"Nope. Don’t tell me to google or go someplace to research. You made the claim, show me the evidence. The burden is on he who makes the claim. You can’t rest on a generic tome about critical thinking hoping that inference that I don’t employ it sticks. It doesn’t. Where’s your evidence that vaccines kill more people that they prevent getting diseases?"
Since it is your health that you should be concerned with, it should be up to you to do all you can to keep your health, and that would include doing your own research, much as I have done. If you don't want to, that's okay with me, but don't expect me to do it for you.
He found VAERS as well as the CDC's disclaimer that the reports are not proven associations (you could say the same about vaccines by the same reasoning - that they are not proven to prevent disease. - the old "correlation does not equal causation." They only use that one when it's in their favor. I told him the CDC buys and sells $4 billion a year in vaccines, so of course, they'll put a disclaimer in there. Why would they even have VAERS if the reports to it weren't reliable? I should have added that the vaccine court (NVIC) has paid out over $4 billion for injuries including death. He probably would have said those injuries weren't proven, too. As I always say, use common sense and logic when investigating things. Unfortunately, only 1-10% of adverse events even get reported to VAERS. It was becoming obvious that he had done no research on vaccines and was probably relying on the fake news media (including Snopes since this is what started this exchange).
Next, this comment came out of the blue (there had been no prior mention of "herd immunity);" where did this remark come from? "For someone who extols research and critical thinking about vaccines he’s clearly never heard of herd immunity. Anyway. Claims require proof and extreme claims require extreme proof. Or we are free to ignore your claim."
Of course, he is free to ignore whatever claim anyone makes. However, it would be wise to investigate the claim since it may well affect his health and well being. But that is totally up to him.
I posted two links for him about the myth of herd immunity and why it can't possibly work. Here is one of those: Herd Immunity. Just knowing that vaccine protection, when it works, lasts only from 2 - 10 years is enough to tell you most of the adult population in the U.S. is no longer protected from vaccine diseases, thus no "herd immunity."
In his next comment below, he missed the point - Using measles as an example - No One is dying from measles even though less than half the population has any vaccine protection. Vaccines have absolutely nothing to do with any of the unvaccinated not dying, or even getting the disease.
Next, this comment:"His pitch (referring to me as if I was pitching something, which I wasn't - I was trying to introduce them to some factual research and get them to do some research) seems to be that in raw numbers vaccine deaths outnumber disease deaths. Then another one said, "He's ignoring the overwhelming number of people prevented from dying, as Charlie points out."
So I told him vaccines were not responsible for the decrease in deaths from all those diseases and to look at graphs of those diseases from the late 1800s or so to the present and check when the vaccines were introduced. I also mentioned that Scarlet Fever had no vaccine and followed the same slope down in the graph. And attached this graph to make it easy for them to follow things:
It's sad that people don't check actual facts and instead rely on what they hear in the media or from those who profit from vaccines. What those who promote vaccines do it pick specific years for their charts so it appears vaccines made a huge difference, usually a few years before the vaccine came out and after a spike up in cases.
Next, I added the below link to another article about the myth of herd immunity (the link has lots of other information so they could start on their own research. It is part of a 12 part series with links to each of the 12 parts at the bottom of the page. It has links to studies supporting what they say. Of course, anyone is always free to check on what they say (as I did when I began my research. Enjoy! Herd Immunity and More. To this information, the FB guys said the following (unbelievable, I know - it showed me they had no interest in doing the research or of learning the truth):
The first guy said this about the link: "but it's got 12 parts! It has to be authoritative. 12, not 11!" (nothing like a little sarcasm instead of actually doing some research). Then the other guy said, "I think I'll choose to believe history, science and the experts over ad hoc conspiracy." Considering he chose not to learn these things or research history, science and the experts, he illustrates the last line from my favorite quote - "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind."
And one of his final comments: "Sorry, but I find discussions with conspiracy theorists a pointless waste of my time. Have a nice day."
That is what people who don't do the research say. They will put labels on those who did the research calling them conspiracy theorists, anti-vaxxers, quacks, etc., probably in an attempt to hide their ignorance and lack of research or knowledge regarding vaccines. Then one of them said (now this is funny, or perhaps sad because I had shown him lots of facts), "I can see why you hate facts about vaccines, then."
It's pathetic that those who don't do the research and refuse to read links provided in order to learn something meaningful. I finished with the following.
Not facts (referring to what he said about "facts") if you do the actual research. from INDEPENDENT SOURCES including doctors, scientists, immunologists, virologists, etc. And I supplied the links from my last post (I'm guessing around 200 of them, although I doubt they'll check any. Then said I was done commenting on that thread, and bye bye. There was no point to continue.
It seems some people can't handle the truth, are brainwashed by the media, are making a profit from vaccines, don't want to take the time to learn the truth, or ? Maybe someone else will find some of the links useful and the pro-choice pro-freedom people (isn't that what the U.S. is supposed to be?) will gain another knowledgeable person. If someone learns the dangers of vaccines and it saves even one person, it will have been worth it.
If some of you wonder why I bother with this - seeing and reading about the countless lives destroyed or ended (mostly children) because of vaccines, and all the lies told, I can't sit by and do nothing. The past 30 years I have spent my life helping others with their health. As long as I can I will continue to share what I have learned through research and share that knowledge. Some people, like those above, will doubtfully ever change for whatever reason. Or perhaps they will when a catastrophic vaccine reaction happens to them or someone they know. That's sad. With all the above said, I don't want anyone to listen to me - I want everyone to do the research from (and this is IMPORTANT!!!) Independent Sources as I have done.
So far, I've only researched vaccines related to people. Many years ago when I was growing up, I had dogs as did many of the people I knew. None of the dogs ever got cancer. Now I know of several dogs with, or that have died from, cancer. I started wondering why. Unlike they do with autism, they can't say that they never noticed it before (which isn't true about autism either). What changed is that they are now giving dogs a lot more vaccines. If you're a dog owner, please do yourself a favor and read this article. It may save you money and save your dog, too. I'm wondering - if the vaccines are the cause of the dogs cancers, what's going to happen to all the people who have had their 70+ vaccines as they grow older? Remember, you can't unvaccinate.
In an upcoming blog, I'll be sharing some more links about vaccines and autism rates and mortality, comparing the number of vaccines in several countries and their outcomes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)