I only shoot people with a camera! Too bad they can't get everyone to trade in their guns for cameras! Back in the 1970's when these were shot, people didn't get shot with guns or vaccines in school, and I'm guessing that no one knew or heard of autism or ASD, at least not that I can remember. There were no special ed classes when I went to high school. Fast forward to 2018. Welcome to real news and fake news and trying to tell which is which. And the media doing whatever it takes to get ratings, not to mention the internet and social media, which brings me to the following.
The school shooting in Florida has been all over the news and social media, so thought I would add my two cents - some thoughts and theories. You may wonder why I would mention vaccines and school shootings in the same post. What do they have in common? The answer, unfortunately, is that they both kill innocent children. Or maybe that vaccines can and do lead to brain damage that might cause this kind of tragedy. I have spent hundreds of hours studying vaccines over the past several years. And I've studied health in general, mostly diet and supplements, for over 30 years. By practicing a healthy organic diet and taking immune supporting supplements, I have no need for toxic vaccines that can cause brain damage and/or death. Please don't think for a moment that I'm lessening the impact of the school shootings....what I am saying is people should be at least as outraged about getting shot with a vaccine as they are by guns. By now, you've all seen what the recent shooting has done to all the families involved, not to mention the fear children are now facing in schools. Multiply that many times over from being shot with vaccines.
So why are people yelling and screaming (some literally) in the news about guns and shootings, but not a peep about vaccines(hint: news media also known as MSM)? Here is a link to how many have died from being shot with vaccines from 2000 - 2015: LINK. Keep in mind that the numbers listed are only 1/10 (according to the CDC) to 1/100 (according to other medical professionals and researchers) of the actual deaths and injuries from vaccines. Why? Many doctors and/or parents don't report these to VAERS, many people don't connect the injury or death to the vaccine, and many in medicine will tell people that it wasn't the vaccine when in fact it was. They'll say it was SIDS or cause unknown or a coincidence that your child died hours or days after having a vaccine reaction. Many people don't know about VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). The farther away from the vaccine, the more likely people will believe the doctors or won't connect the injury/death to the vaccine. Using only a factor of 30, which is most likely low, that would still give a little less than 200,000 deaths from vaccines in 15 years, or around 13,000/year, or 35 every day! EVERY DAY!!!!! As they keep adding more vaccines to the schedule, this will no doubt get worse (probably it already has).
The latest school shooting killed 17, which is a tragedy, as are the psychological effects. Even one person would have been a tragedy. I watched those who met with Trump on TV - I saw their pain. The news media (and social media) has been dominated by this story over the past several days. Please don't think I'm downplaying this in any way, but where is the media when twice as many people get killed on that same day by vaccines, and on every single day, every day of every year. Have you ever heard of even one of those tragedies in the news? Not by the mainstream media - they get too much money in advertising from the vaccine makers. Not only do they not cover the tragedies, but they promote more vaccines. Imagine if they promoted guns like they do vaccines.
From the coverage of this story in the news, they mentioned it's likely the killer had autism. Did that cause his behavior? Did autism or brain damage cause him to lose control? Did vaccines play a role in that or other neurological damage that caused his behavior? Was he then put on medication that made his problems worse (he had been on medication according to the latest news)? I'm asking that because as the number of vaccines has increased, so has the incidence of autism and many other neurological and health problems. The powers that be deny deny deny the autism link but the evidence says otherwise (along with at least 30 studies) as did the CDC whistleblower. Maybe it's made worse by GMO's and glyphosate usage, fluoride in the water, and other environmental toxins and neurotoxins or a combination of all these things. Keep in mind that autism has gone from 1 in 10,000 a few decades ago (back when those photos were taken) to less than 1 in 50 now and continues to increase.
Could it be that vaccines caused his neurological/behavioral problems which lead up to the school shooting? We'll never know because even if that was the case, it would never be reported, just as are deaths from vaccines never reported in the news. Unfortunately, I have a feeling these shootings will become more common as more children are damaged from vaccines, fluoride, glyphosate exposure, etc., then given drugs whose side effects are listed as violent behavior, suicide, aggression, etc., not to mention all the news coverage. What's the message given to these brain-damaged people by the news? Want to become famous and be in the news media non-stop for several weeks? I won't even type the answer to this question. This killer's name and photo should never have been in the news. I heard threats similar to this have risen from 10 a day to 50 a day since the news coverage of this.
We'll always hear many arguments about gun control - "if they were outlawed or severely controlled, only criminals would have them," etc. Unfortunately, even if guns could be totally eliminated, mentally ill people could still build bombs, maybe get grenades and other weapons, use a vehicle to drive into a crowd, then use a knife to kill more (as someone recently did). As is always the case, you have to eliminate those things that are causing the mental problems and the hate. Unfortunately (again) that won't happen because there is too much money involved in drugs, vaccines, and all the other environmental toxins. About the only thing left is to keep your eyes wide open and when you see something, say something and hope those planning something like this are caught before they can act. I just heard one good idea - have metal detectors at school entrances, much like at courthouses and sporting events. As far as teachers carrying guns, if they are properly trained and want to, I would be OK with it. They probably would have a better chance of getting hit by lightning then ever having to use it and just knowing that teachers might be armed maybe would be a deterrent to some. There are pros and cons to everything and arguments on both sides. Let's hope we come up with the right answers.
Back to vaccines. If you search this blog for "Vaccines," you'll find many posts and links for further research - all are from independent sources which include doctors, scientists, immunologists, neurologists, etc. If you look at graphs from 1900 - 2015 of all the diseases for which there are vaccines, you'll see that most of the diseases were almost gone before vaccines for them were introduced. Scarlet Fever had no vaccine but its graph followed the same slope down to near zero as the other diseases. One new study claimed that those who got the flu shot this year or last year are 630% more likely to spread the flu. Makes sense considering the severity of this year's widespread flu.
What is really scary is that knowing vaccines are killing more people every few days than all the school shootings, then hearing that they are making vaccinations mandatory to attend school, as they just did in California.
Another thing you won't hear in the news is this link: death by medicine. Each year over 750,000 people in the U.S. die from medicine (prescription drugs, medical error, bedsores, infection, malnutrition while in the hospital, surgery, unnecessary procedures, and as outpatients). That is over 2,000 every day. Once in a while, you hear about one of them, usually if they're a celebrity. No marches, no meeting with the president. Very little, if any, outrage. Why is that?
They (news media, government, social media, etc.) are talking about ways to keep people safe from these terrible shootings. No one is talking about how to make vaccines safe (or more effective). Almost no one is talking about how to make medicine safer. No one is talking about how to stay healthy through diet, supplements, and exercise. By no one, I mean no one in the media and no one in the government. You absolutely MUST do your own research on medicine, on vaccines, and on supplements from independent sources (sources that don't profit from their advice and studies meaning those without conflicts of interest).
One of my favorite quotes, which I came across on a financial site, is as follows, "It astounds me how people never learn, and simply accept what is suggested to them by those writing articles, or those speaking on television, as gospel. Have we lost the ability to think critically? Have we lost the ability to question what we are told based upon actual facts? Or have we simply adopted the "Foghorn Leghorn perspective: "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind.""
Having seen the pain from the parents and friends of all those killed at the school shooting, that is happening every day due to vaccines and medicine. It's just not covered by the media. If it was, maybe vaccines would actually be made safe and effective, and maybe medicine would be cleaned up a bit and we would have no need for so-called health care (in reality, let's call it what it really is - sick-care).
A little about logic and common sense: This part is a little long, but some things to think about: LOGIC. COMMON SENSE, and STATISTICS: U.S. Supreme Court said vaccines are "UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE." Why do drug companies have no vaccine liability? Those who want mandatory vaccines say that if people stop vaccinating, all those diseases will come back worse than ever - well, by age 28, all the childhood vaccines have worn off, and less than half of adults get vaccinated, so where are all the epidemics (pandemics?) and why aren't all the adults dropping dead like flies from all those diseases? If vaccines are effective, why are most outbreaks happening in vaccinated populations (especially China where 99.5% of the population is vaccinated, and they are having outbreaks)? Why would anyone care if someone's child wasn't vaccinated if yours was, as yours would be immune to all those vaccine-preventable diseases if vaccines were effective? If they are safe, why are more people dying from the vaccines than from the diseases? According to VAERS - E.R. visits - over 2 million, Hospitalized - over 600,000, Life-Threatening - over 110,000, and Disabled - over 82,000. Deaths were listed in a paragraph above. Here's a chart from the CDC for 2014 Pertussis cases
(https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/downloads/pertuss-surv-report-2014.pdf) - notice in the lower right chart that over 5x as many cases reported in those who got the 3+ recommended vaccines compared to those who did not get the vaccine. The above does not take into account the possible long-term side effects which are unknown as there are no studies available for this. Did you know that to save one person from getting meningitis, the meningococcal vaccine will have killed three people and injured much more? If you look at graphs of diseases from the 1800s to the present, and where vaccines came in, you'll see that most diseases were almost already gone when the vaccines arrived. Check the graph for scarlet fever - there was no vaccine for that, so you can't give vaccines credit for that. Why aren't people still getting Scarlet Fever? Why do many, if not most, doctors not vaccinate? And finally, why have there been almost no comparison studies in the U.S. between vaccinated and unvaccinated people (there were a couple in Europe showing vaccinated children less healthy than unvaccinated)? I know, that last question is a tough one, but if you actually spend some time on it, you'll figure it out (and no, they wouldn't be sacrificing the unvaccinated (which they use as a reason for not doing this) because there are around a million children who do not get vaccinated). If those who want vaccines would actually do the research, fact checking, use some common sense and logic, they might learn the truth. Instead, many of them accuse those who actually have done the research of not doing research and those who want safe vaccines are called anti-vaxx. I wonder if they call those who want safe highways, anti-highway. I wonder if they call the U.S. Supreme Court anti-vaxx for calling vaccines unavoidably unsafe. No doubt they would call you that if you said what SCOTUS said.
As you've noticed, a good part of this post is more about vaccines than gun violence. Part of the reason is that vaccines kill more people, but also because they may be partly responsible for the brain damage that could lead to the gun violence.
I'm wondering about the effect of all the news coverage of the shooter on others who may now think of doing the same so they can become "famous."
One last word - In the movie, "The Day the Earth Stood Still," they had robots that patrolled the universe and eliminated anyone who raised a weapon against anyone else. No more wars and no more violence - what a great idea. Well, as long as the robots don't decide they no longer need us.
No comments:
Post a Comment