If you look up the definition of Freedom, you will find these two things, among many others: 1. The power, or right, to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint; 2. the state of not being subject to or affected by (a particular undesirable thing).
Unfortunately, there are two freedoms we are losing or have lost. In the case of supplements, for example, you cannot say that a particular supplement will heal you or cure you from any affliction, even if the science and anecdotal evidence has shown that it does. And when vaccines are made mandatory, they violate definition one and two above and we are no longer free in America - you will have lost your FREEDOM. It doesn't matter if you are Pro-vaccine, Anti-vaccine, or somewhere in the middle - it's not about pro or anti vaccine, it is about Freedom. Once you lose the freedom to decide what toxins can be injected into your body, what other freedoms may go? It doesn't matter to me if you want to get vaccinated or not - I hope you will choose after becoming fully informed of the dangers and benefits by researching from independent sources (from those who have nothing to gain one way or the other). I have done several hundred hours of research and have come to my conclusion, and have posted many links to independent sites from immunologists, doctors, scientists, and researchers, among others, including sites to people whose children have been adversely affected by vaccines, up to and including death. If a mandated medical procedure (experiment) can cause permanent injury or loss of life to you or your loved ones, it sure seems like that can be categorized as a loss of Freedom.
If you are one of those who believe vaccines are for the greatest good, please read the Link to this article about the Greatest Good. If everything was defined by the greatest good, why aren't we hearing about mandatory healthy nutrition, about the benefits of supplements for the immune system, about eliminating all the environmental toxins, or about reforming the medical profession (which is either the first or third leading cause of death in the U.S. - see this Link for death statistics.), etc.
Speaking of the greatest good - let's look at the Pertussis (Whooping Cough) vaccine. They are advertising it on TV, and mandating it in California (and other places) for children. But if you go to the CDC site, you can see that those who get the recommended series of vaccines for Pertussis get Pertussis about 4.5 times more than non vaccinated children. I wonder how they explain that increasing Pertussis by 450% is for the greater good? Here's the chart for 2013 (and 2014 which is even worse). Look at the bottom right chart. By signing the vaccine law, the governor of California has mandated that there will be more cases of Pertussis? That's why the CDC chart says. For Mumps, almost everyone who has been getting that has been vaccinated for that - I don't have the exact figure offhand, but somewhere around 87% if I remember. Let's not forget, besides increasing the likelihood of getting the disease, you also open yourself to the side effects.
About vaccines and autism - you should really listen to District Attorney Nico LaHood and wife Davida tell the story of their son and daughter's vaccine injury - He is the criminal district attorney in San Antonio, TX. We need more people like him - he knows how to research and investigate.
Some more links to read or listen to:
The Effect of Aluminum in Vaccines on Humans | Chris Shaw, PhD
World Health Organization Publishes Strategies For EU Healthcare Professionals To Convince Vaccine Deniers Vaccines Are Safe - if they were safe, no one would need convincing. In fact, if they were safe and effective, people would be lining up, and the vaccine makers would have no problem with liability. But even the Supreme Court of the U.S. has called them Unavoidably Unsafe. And released the makers from any liability. SAFE? You decide. If you decide they are not safe, then you know you are being lied to by the vaccine makers, the medical profession, the media, and the government. So you really need to do your research (again, from independent sources) and stop listening to those who tell you they are safe.
You can start by looking at the vaccine inserts - the ones in the vaccine box - the ones that list all the side effects, safety studies (well, there probably aren't any of those), and all the ingredients. And then some of the links I've posted here and on past blog posts.
Tuesday, August 30, 2016
Thursday, August 25, 2016
Vaccinations - Some New Links with Summaries...and Thoughts
In some of my posts over the last year, I've supplied many links to information about vaccines. I've tried to pick and choose carefully those which were most reliable from a scientific standpoint. Ones that are written by immunologists, doctors, and others in similar professions who have studied vaccines extensively. Plus links to VAERS and some CDC charts of disease rates. I've tried to ensure the links are from reliable, independent resources, those without conflicts of interest.
The ones with conflicts of interest you get to see all the time from the media, from your doctors, the CDC and FDA, those in government - all those who make money from the vaccine industry. Let's think about it differently for a minute, and let's say we were talking about shoes instead of vaccines. If you were buying a $500 pair of shoes, who would you ask about the quality? Would you ask only those who made a profit from the sale? And would you be likely to buy the shoes if they had no guarantee, no return policy, and you knew someone who had bought them, and they caused that person a foot or knee injury. And the company that makes them has no liability of any kind. Yet with vaccines, which can and do kill and permanently injure people, may not work at all, have no liability, some of which are made in China, few people actually do the research. How many doctors will tell you what's in them? How many actually know?
Well, here are the new links:
Harvard Trained Immunologist Demolishes California Legislation That Terminates Vaccine Exemptions - This was written before SB277 passed. The title is pretty self explanatory. She had gone to Stanford for her MA degree and Harvard for her PhD. She explains why unvaccinated children pose no risk to others - and why vaccinated children do. With appendices and references.
Pertussis epidemic despite high levels of vaccination coverage with acellular pertussis vaccine. - An abstract from PubMed on the Pertussis vaccine - those with the highest rates of vaccination had the highest rates of Pertussis. You can also see this here: Pertussis Serveillance Report from the CDC.
Dr. Toni Bark, M.D., Comments of Jimmy Kimmel with Robert DeNiro - A must see video. She destroys Jimmy Kimmel's comments about vaccination. From my own research, I completely agree with her analysis of his comments. When someone in his position gives medical advice, which I thought was illegal to do unless you're a doctor, and it can cause death or injury, should he not be liable?
Vaccine Price List from CDC Website - Just for your information
Asking Others to Vaccinate is Unethical - This article makes some good points about vaccines and ethics.
There was one more I was going to include, but misplaced it for now. What it said was that there were 3 diseases for which there was no vaccine, and listed them - Scarlet Fever was one, I think the other two were worse than Scarlet Fever, and all three are now gone. How could that be if there were no vaccines. Besides better hygiene, cleaner drinking water, better nutrition, they actually quarantined those who had those diseases. What a concept - no known side effects to quarantining someone. Oh, but I guess there's no money to be made, either.
The ones with conflicts of interest you get to see all the time from the media, from your doctors, the CDC and FDA, those in government - all those who make money from the vaccine industry. Let's think about it differently for a minute, and let's say we were talking about shoes instead of vaccines. If you were buying a $500 pair of shoes, who would you ask about the quality? Would you ask only those who made a profit from the sale? And would you be likely to buy the shoes if they had no guarantee, no return policy, and you knew someone who had bought them, and they caused that person a foot or knee injury. And the company that makes them has no liability of any kind. Yet with vaccines, which can and do kill and permanently injure people, may not work at all, have no liability, some of which are made in China, few people actually do the research. How many doctors will tell you what's in them? How many actually know?
Well, here are the new links:
Harvard Trained Immunologist Demolishes California Legislation That Terminates Vaccine Exemptions - This was written before SB277 passed. The title is pretty self explanatory. She had gone to Stanford for her MA degree and Harvard for her PhD. She explains why unvaccinated children pose no risk to others - and why vaccinated children do. With appendices and references.
Pertussis epidemic despite high levels of vaccination coverage with acellular pertussis vaccine. - An abstract from PubMed on the Pertussis vaccine - those with the highest rates of vaccination had the highest rates of Pertussis. You can also see this here: Pertussis Serveillance Report from the CDC.
Dr. Toni Bark, M.D., Comments of Jimmy Kimmel with Robert DeNiro - A must see video. She destroys Jimmy Kimmel's comments about vaccination. From my own research, I completely agree with her analysis of his comments. When someone in his position gives medical advice, which I thought was illegal to do unless you're a doctor, and it can cause death or injury, should he not be liable?
Vaccine Price List from CDC Website - Just for your information
Asking Others to Vaccinate is Unethical - This article makes some good points about vaccines and ethics.
There was one more I was going to include, but misplaced it for now. What it said was that there were 3 diseases for which there was no vaccine, and listed them - Scarlet Fever was one, I think the other two were worse than Scarlet Fever, and all three are now gone. How could that be if there were no vaccines. Besides better hygiene, cleaner drinking water, better nutrition, they actually quarantined those who had those diseases. What a concept - no known side effects to quarantining someone. Oh, but I guess there's no money to be made, either.
Sunday, August 14, 2016
Vaccines and "The Science is Settled"
What is Science? The intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
Regarding vaccine safety they always use the phrase, "the science is settled." Anyone who studies science would know the science is never settled. NEVER! It is always changing based on new observations. So that statement is a contradiction in terms. What is settled is that a certain percent of people will die or be injured from vaccines. As the U.S. Supreme Count has said, vaccines are "Unavoidably Unsafe."
What are some observations regarding vaccines and their studies? Well, one is that if you vaccinate someone with a particular vaccine, and then with a "placebo" that contains some or all the same toxins, you'll see the same amount of injuries and deaths, and the conclusion that will be made is that the vaccine is no worse than a placebo. Wait, what? Exactly! Sort of like if you smashed your thumb with a hammer, so you used a different brand hammer and also smashed your thumb and then came to the conclusion that the hammer was totally safe. Your thumb must have spontaneously smashed itself.
Another observation is that if you disregard parts of your study that disagree with what you are looking for, and you later throw out those data, your study with confirm what you wanted it to. See the movie, Vaxxed.
Next observation - if someone gets a series of vaccines, and then gets brain injured, autistic, or dies, they will tell you it can't possibly be the vaccine (it was "just a coincidence"), although they have paid out over $3 billion in claims against vaccines, including for autism. Like they will really pay you if the vaccine didn't cause the problem? They only pay about 1/3 of the claims, and most people don't even know to file.
What about all the studies telling you how safe vaccines are? When your child becomes brain injured or dies after a vaccination, then you'll know about the fraud involved with the studies. Unfortunately, then it will be a bit too late. Again, go see the movie, Vaxxed.
What is better than reading all the so called studies? It's really pretty easy, yet no one will do it - compare vaccinated populations with not vaccinated populations and see which is healthier. Also compare the most vaccinated countries with the least vaccinated countries, that have equal cleanliness clean drinking water, and good hygiene, and see where they are ranked for health and longevity. And autism. A few people in other countries have done these comparisons, and many have posted online, about how much healthier are those who are not vaccinated.
What I really don't understand is this: the odds of winning the Mega Millions Lotto Jackpot is 1 in 258, 890, 850 (you would have a better chance of not knowing where someone you needed to locate lived anywhere in the U.S., but finding that person at the first home you went to anywhere in any state in the U.S.), but everyone thinks they'll win. The odds of getting vaccine injured is probably 1 in 200, and people figure it won't happen to them. I've used 1 in 200 based on everything I've read and researched (VAERS database, anecdotal evidence, etc.), but even if it is 1 in 10,000, if it happens to your child, does that really matter?
If you listen to all those who make money and profit from vaccines, those who have conflicts of interest, you'll believe they are the best thing since _________________ . But if you research for yourself from independent sources, you'll know that is a lie that may cost your child (or you) his/her life or lifelong injuries. And until the makers of vaccines are held accountable and liable, they will never be safe. And the science will never be settled!
Regarding vaccine safety they always use the phrase, "the science is settled." Anyone who studies science would know the science is never settled. NEVER! It is always changing based on new observations. So that statement is a contradiction in terms. What is settled is that a certain percent of people will die or be injured from vaccines. As the U.S. Supreme Count has said, vaccines are "Unavoidably Unsafe."
What are some observations regarding vaccines and their studies? Well, one is that if you vaccinate someone with a particular vaccine, and then with a "placebo" that contains some or all the same toxins, you'll see the same amount of injuries and deaths, and the conclusion that will be made is that the vaccine is no worse than a placebo. Wait, what? Exactly! Sort of like if you smashed your thumb with a hammer, so you used a different brand hammer and also smashed your thumb and then came to the conclusion that the hammer was totally safe. Your thumb must have spontaneously smashed itself.
Another observation is that if you disregard parts of your study that disagree with what you are looking for, and you later throw out those data, your study with confirm what you wanted it to. See the movie, Vaxxed.
Next observation - if someone gets a series of vaccines, and then gets brain injured, autistic, or dies, they will tell you it can't possibly be the vaccine (it was "just a coincidence"), although they have paid out over $3 billion in claims against vaccines, including for autism. Like they will really pay you if the vaccine didn't cause the problem? They only pay about 1/3 of the claims, and most people don't even know to file.
What about all the studies telling you how safe vaccines are? When your child becomes brain injured or dies after a vaccination, then you'll know about the fraud involved with the studies. Unfortunately, then it will be a bit too late. Again, go see the movie, Vaxxed.
What is better than reading all the so called studies? It's really pretty easy, yet no one will do it - compare vaccinated populations with not vaccinated populations and see which is healthier. Also compare the most vaccinated countries with the least vaccinated countries, that have equal cleanliness clean drinking water, and good hygiene, and see where they are ranked for health and longevity. And autism. A few people in other countries have done these comparisons, and many have posted online, about how much healthier are those who are not vaccinated.
What I really don't understand is this: the odds of winning the Mega Millions Lotto Jackpot is 1 in 258, 890, 850 (you would have a better chance of not knowing where someone you needed to locate lived anywhere in the U.S., but finding that person at the first home you went to anywhere in any state in the U.S.), but everyone thinks they'll win. The odds of getting vaccine injured is probably 1 in 200, and people figure it won't happen to them. I've used 1 in 200 based on everything I've read and researched (VAERS database, anecdotal evidence, etc.), but even if it is 1 in 10,000, if it happens to your child, does that really matter?
If you listen to all those who make money and profit from vaccines, those who have conflicts of interest, you'll believe they are the best thing since _________________ . But if you research for yourself from independent sources, you'll know that is a lie that may cost your child (or you) his/her life or lifelong injuries. And until the makers of vaccines are held accountable and liable, they will never be safe. And the science will never be settled!
Saturday, August 13, 2016
Paddle Tennis Action Shots
The following photos were shot on Friday, August 12, 2016 at the Venice Beach Paddle Tennis courts. After playing several sets, and needing a break from the action, I thought it would be nice to photograph some action shots. All were shot with the Panasonic FZ200 which it the camera I use at the beach because it is light weight, has a maximum aperture of f2.8 at all focal lengths, and zooms from 24mm - 600mm. Of course, the quality won't be as good as a Canon or Nikon with a prime lens, and it has a slight delay after shooting a photo before you can shoot the next one (I'm wondering if perhaps that's due to the compact flash card I'm using), but can get some nice shots. Forgot to mention it has image stabilization which allows me to shoot at 600mm hand held - during the day.
The shots are of Nicole, whom I played 3 sets with her on my side (thankfully), and one set against her - she's a great player, and fun with or against. And she was nice enough to let me take these. Hope you enjoy, and if you play paddle tennis against her, watch out! As always, to see the photos larger, just click on them.
The shots are of Nicole, whom I played 3 sets with her on my side (thankfully), and one set against her - she's a great player, and fun with or against. And she was nice enough to let me take these. Hope you enjoy, and if you play paddle tennis against her, watch out! As always, to see the photos larger, just click on them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)