Search This Blog

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Vaccines and Medicine - Some Questions - And a Few More Links

Some questions to think about:

Why is anyone who is pro-safety, pro-freedom, pro-TRUTH, pro-health regarding vaccines, called an anti-vaxxer?  If you are pro-safety or question a car's safety, does that make you anti-car?  If you are pro-vaxx, you want everyone to be vaccinated, no?  Using the same reasoning, if someone is anti-vaxx, they would want vaccines outlawed for everyone.  Which, of course, is not the case 99.999% of the time.  The anti-vaxx label is completely ridiculous and misleading, and meant for only one reason - to demonize those who want SAFE and EFFECTIVE vaccines, who want the truth, and who believe in what this country was founded on (remember freedom?).  So they come up with the anti-vaxx label to keep pushing, and profiting from, the current vaccines regardless of the consequences to you.  Reminds me of a song from the '60s by Steppenwolf - The Pusher, only instead of grass, it's now vaccines,

Why are vaccine injuries and deaths never reported on the news?

Why wasn't the CDC whistleblower case of Dr. William Thompson not on the news?

When congressman Bill Posey delivered a speech to congress about CDC whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, why wasn't that on the news, and why has congress not yet investigate this?

Why did they discard data from the study that showed a link between vaccines and autism?

Why doesn't anyone in the media talk about the 30+ studies (perhaps as high as 100 studies) that show a link between vaccines and autism?

Why has autism gone from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 45 in just the last 40 years or so?  Why have allergies, asthma, childhood cancers, etc., increased dramatically over the last 20 years?

The U.S. gives more vaccines to children than any other country - why does the U.S. have the highest infant mortality rate than any other developed nation?

The U.S. spends more than any other country on medicine, and gives more vaccines than any other country, so why are we near the bottom of the list in health and longevity when compared to other developed countries?

Why isn't it on the news that when 3+ the whooping cough (pertussis) vaccines doses are given to children, they have the greatest incidence of getting pertussis (about 3 1/2 times more than non-vaccinated kids)?  Here's the Chart from the CDC.

How, in this country, do they claim the wrong flu vaccine is 23% (last year) or 18% (this year) effective, while for the same flu, the vaccine is rated ZERO % effective in Canada?  Here's that link - Second paragraph? (My thoughts on this agreed with Canada's zero % all along.)

How is it they claim either coincidence or no cause and effect when someone gets injured or dies after getting vaccinated, but when they don't die, suddenly there's cause and effect regarding vaccines preventing disease?

Terror attacks, which are a tragedy, are covered in the news every day for weeks.  Yet, the following is never covered :  Deaths caused by Medicine.  Why is that (food for thought)?  (Note:  these deaths total over 2,000/day - not sure what the number is for vaccines, as most are also never reported, or completely disregarded and listed as "cause unknown."  But these 2,000/day include medical mistakes, properly prescribed drugs, malnutrition in hospitals, hospital acquired infections, etc.).  To be fair, perhaps a few of these might have died without medical intervention, but isn't medicine supposed to save these people?

Why are you not told, before getting vaccinated, about the risks, about the vaccine court, about VAERS, and not shown the vaccine insert listing ingredients and possible side effects?

Why do you think vaccine makers have no liability?  What does that mean for their safety?

Why do (and how can) vaccine makers say vaccines are safe, when the US Supreme Court said they are "unavoidably unsafe?"  Is the Supreme Court part of a "conspiracy theory?"  Then why do they say so called "anti-vaxxers" are?

Why are those companies who profit from medicine and vaccines allowed to do the research to prove safety?  Safety?  Think Vioxx, cigarettes (back in the 1940's and 1950's they were claimed to be good for you), DDT, etc.  All the studies showed they were safe at one time.  Until they weren't.

Why do people claim that the amount of aluminum, mercury, MSG, formaldehyde, etc., is too small to cause harm when they really have no idea (not to mention you're getting multiple vaccines at a time and they are given to infants who have a much lower body weight than a grown person)?  Your body makes only 8mcg or T3 (thyroid hormone), but it regulates many bodily functions to keep you alive.  One nanogram (one billionth of a gram and one 25 thousandth of the amount of aluminum in some vaccines) is enough of the active ingredient in poison oak to cause an outbreak in some people.  It's a ridiculous argument that amounts are too small, but pro-vaxxers keep repeating it thinking that repetition makes it so.

Why do those who are vaccinated worry about those who are not, if vaccines work?  And if they don't work, why take them?  The argument then gets shifted to, "you're endangering those who are immune compromised."  Well, I hate to say this, but there are over two hundred diseases, most of which have no vaccine, so if those who are immune compromised are out with the general public, or exposed to them, then they are in trouble anyway.  Here is a link to infectious diseases:  Link.  Plus some vaccines may shed so you can now pass the disease on to those who are immune compromised (again, if you read the insert, the one they avoid showing you, you'll see this warning - you can see all the inserts for vaccines at the CDC and other websites).



Why am I asking all these questions?  Well, you get the other side of the story daily in the media and advertising.  You need both sides to determine what is best for you.  The media and drug companies do their best to scare the hell out of you - not getting vaccinated means death!  Many years ago I had a doctor who said that to me when I cut my finger on a piece of glass, and he wanted to give me a tetanus shot.  I don't remember if I got it - it was 50 years ago.  But knowing what I know now, thanks to doing my research, I wouldn't get it today.  That should be my freedom of choice.  If you feel you want a vaccine, no one will stop you.  It's your choice.

If you do your research, using independent sources, and use some common sense and logic, you can find the answer to these and many other questions.  In a previous post I listed many links that can help you with this.  If nothing else, I hope you at least start thinking about the pros and cons, and will get informed about vaccines and medicine in general.  It's only your health, your life, and your freedom that are at stake.  There are some more links in this post - including one that makes a very good summary of everything I've been writing.

Just this in:  Statin drugs prevent the flu vaccine from working (assuming that they work to begin with):  here is the link (listen to the video):  Link.  What I understand is that if you have a weak immune system, vaccines aren't that effective, and if you have a strong immune system, they work better, but then you probably won't need them as your body can fight off the disease.

I hope the questions above at least got you thinking and will lead to you researching vaccines and medicine, and very important....from Independent Resources, NOT those who profit from the results (aka - conflicts of interest).

This is getting a bit long, but just saw this in an article on MarketWatch (it's applicable to everything in life):  "It astounds me how investors never learn, and simply accept what is suggested to them by those writing articles, or those speaking on television, as gospel. Have we lost the ability to think critically? Have we lost the ability to question what we are told based upon actual facts? Or have we simply adopted the "Foghorn Leghorn perspective":  "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind."

Unfortunately, the above seems to be the case regarding vaccines....and medicine.  But, it you take the time to really find out the truth, then you will know what the best course of action is for you.

Some more links:
Mandatory Vaccination – What You Need To Consider - Note:  Site loads a little slow, but it loads.
The Moral Right to Conscientious, Philosophical and Personal Belief Exemption to Vaccination - Summarizes a lot of what my other links have said.
First They Came for the Anti-Vaxxers - please see above for my thoughts on the label, "anti-vaxx."
Environmental Toxins, Vaccines, and Autism - by Marcella Piper-Terry, MS at Cady Wellness Institute - An excellent video on YouTube - A little over an hour long.

And a Link to my previous list of links about vaccines.

No comments:

Post a Comment