Autism - from 1 in 10,000 or less to 1 in 59 to as high as 1 in 38 depending on whose statistics you believe. They don't know what has caused the rise, but they know It's Not Vaccines.
Fertility rates are dropping, they don't know why, but they know It's Not Vaccines.
ADHD and other brain disorders are rising - they don't know why but they know It's Not Vaccines.
Same for autoimmune disease, allergies, asthma, diabetes, etc. - all are increasing, they don't know why but they know It's Not Vaccines.
If a child dies as the result of a vaccine, they'll say It's Not Vaccines. It's SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome), SUIDS (Sudden Unexplained Infant Death Syndrome), or Cause Unknown, even when the death happens within minutes, although it may even take days or weeks. It's Not Vaccines.
Many deaths and injuries never get reported to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Reporting System) because It's Not Vaccines (even though it really is). Remember to multiply the numbers below (in the common sense and logic section) by somewhere between 3 to 10 to get a more accurate number of injuries and deaths.
How do they know It's Not Vaccines? Is it because of all the safety studies they've neglected to do? Is it because they tested the vaccine against a true inert placebo? Of course not - they use either other vaccines as placeboes or placeboes with active ingredients so that they can show no difference between the placebo group and the vaccinated group. Is it because they've done long-term studies? No again - never did any of those. Have they at least studied vaccines given in combination with each other? Geez, no again.
If the science doesn't support it and the studies don't support it, how can they say It's Not Vaccines? Because they don't care about your health or the health of your children (well, actually maybe they do, to the extent that if everyone is sick, they have more money making opportunities). The only explanation I can figure out is that they are lying to you to increase their bottom line.
Now here's the COMMON SENSE and LOGIC Section: This is a little long, but some things to think about: LOGIC. COMMON SENSE, and STATISTICS: U.S. Supreme Court said vaccines are "UNAVOIDABLY UNSAFE." Why do drug companies have no vaccine liability? Those who want mandatory vaccines say that if people stop vaccinating, all those diseases will come back worse than ever - well, by age 28, all the childhood vaccines have worn off, and less than half of adults get vaccinated, so where are all the epidemics (pandemics?) and why aren't all the adults dropping dead like flies from all those diseases? If vaccines are effective, why are most outbreaks happening in vaccinated populations (especially China where 99.5% of the population is vaccinated, and they are having outbreaks)? Why would anyone care if someone's child wasn't vaccinated if yours was, as yours would be immune to all those vaccine-preventable diseases if vaccines were effective? If they are safe, why have there been over 60,000 deaths (perhaps much higher) in VAERS (where less than 1 in 10 actually gets reported according to CDC, maybe as little as 1 in 100 - I've multiplied by just a factor of 10), E.R. visits - over 2 million, Hospitalized - over 600,000, Life-Threatening - over 110,000, and Disabled - over 82,000. These numbers are for the years 2000 - 2015! (http://tonybelmontphotography.blogspot.com/2016/01/vaccinations-forget-everything-else-for.html) Here's a chart from the CDC for 2014 Pertussis cases
(https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/downloads/pertuss-surv-report-2014.pdf) - notice in the lower right chart that over 5x as many cases reported in those who got the 3+ recommended vaccines compared to those who did not get the vaccine. The above does not take into account the possible long-term side effects which are unknown as there are no studies available for this. Did you know that to save one person from getting meningitis, the meningococcal vaccine will have killed three people and injured much more? More people die and are injured by vaccines than from the diseases they are supposed to prevent (according to statistics from VAERS and CDC). If you look at graphs of diseases from the 1800s to the present, and where vaccines came in, you'll see that most diseases were almost already gone when the vaccines arrived. Check the graph for scarlet fever below and notice the slope is almost identical to the other diseases in the top graph - there was no vaccine for that, so you can't give vaccines credit for that. Why aren't people still getting it? Why do many, if not most, doctors not vaccinate? And finally, why have there been almost no comparison studies in the U.S. between vaccinated and unvaccinated people (there were a couple in Europe showing vaccinated children less healthy than unvaccinated)? I know, that last question is a tough one, but if you actually spend some time on it, you'll figure it out (and no, they wouldn't be sacrificing the unvaccinated because there are around a million children who do not get vaccinated). If those who want vaccines would actually do some research, fact checking, use some common sense and logic, perhaps they would find the truth. Instead, they accuse those who actually have done the research of not doing research and those who want safe vaccines are called anti-vaxx. I wonder if they call those who want safe highways, anti-highway. I wonder if they call the U.S. Supreme Court anti-vaxx for calling vaccines unavoidably unsafe. No doubt they would call you that if you said what SCOTUS said. I know all this won't change the opinions of those who want everyone vaccinated as they seem incapable of logic and common sense or of doing research from independent sources. Then again, perhaps they are profiting from vaccines.
There are those who say the amounts of adjuvants in vaccines is too small to cause problems. In 2016, the EPA published a voluntary health advisory for PFOA and PFOS, warning that exposure to the chemicals at levels above 70 parts per trillion, total, could be dangerous. One part per TRILLION is roughly the equivalent of a single grain of sand in an Olympic-sized swimming pool. The updated HHS assessment was poised to find that exposure to the chemicals at less than one-sixth of that level could be dangerous for sensitive populations like infants and breastfeeding mothers. So when you hear the argument that some of the adjuvants in vaccines are too little to do anything, and are usually in parts per BILLION, think again.
"It astounds me how people never learn, and simply accept what is suggested to them by those writing articles, or those speaking on television, as gospel. Have we lost the ability to think critically? Have we lost the ability to question what we are told based upon actual facts? Or have we simply adopted the "Foghorn Leghorn perspective: "Don't bother me with facts, son. I've already made up my mind.""
No comments:
Post a Comment