Search This Blog

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Vaccines - "You're Not An Expert" - and other Arguments

"YOU'RE NOT AN EXPERT" or "YOU DON'T HAVE A DEGREE IN IMMUNOLOGY."

I see this one in a lot of comments to articles on vaccine safety and promoting informed consent.  Do these people not realize pretty much everyone has access to research and to those who are experts, immunologists, virologists, doctors, etc?  And do that not realize data from the CDC and VAERS is also on the internet?  This is even before we get to the anecdotal evidence of the possible (if not probable) harm that can come from vaccines, especially multiple vaccines given at the same time.  I've certainly learned a lot by researching vaccines and have posted a lot of links in past posts to reputable sites.

ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE IS NO GOOD.

I've always thought this argument was completely wrong.  Then recently found an article, written by a scientist, that said for certain things, anecdotal evidence is better than doing studies.  This is even more true these days as studies can be completely manipulated to show whatever the person or company doing the study wants to show.  With vaccines, there have been NO studies on long term or immediate effects of giving multiple vaccines at the same time.  But they say they're safe.  How can they possibly know that?  Even with individual vaccines, most, if not all the studies, have design flaws.  The biggest one is the use of a "placebo" that is really not a placebo.  Let's use the MMR as an example of what they might do.  The placebo in a study is supposed to be an inert substance, such as saline solution.  What might they use?  The same vaccine without the MMR particles, but with all the same adjuvants that are probably causing the negative reactions, or another vaccine.  Then they compare this vaccine with this "placebo" and tell everyone there is no difference, so the vaccine is safe and doesn't cause autism or brain damage or death.

On the other hand, the anecdotal evidence shows over and over that shortly after vaccination, the child may have seizures, convulsions, behavioral changes, and perhaps die within a few hours or days.  When this happens, are you going to believe the studies about how safe vaccines are, or believe what happened to your child is the result of the vaccine?  Everyone reacts differently to medications; there is no way to know, without some kind of testing, who will be the unlucky ones who have a negative reaction.  There is also no way to know what percent of people will have either short or long term problems due to being vaccinated as most are never reported, and long term it may be difficult to know it was caused by a vaccine.  But at least anecdotal evidence gives us some idea of reality.

IT'S JUST A COINCIDENCE

I just read about a child who was vaccinated and died four hours later.  They listed the death as "Cause Unknown."  It was just a coincidence.  NOT!  How stupid do they think people are?  It's like saying that if a person gets hit by a care and dies, well, a normal person wouldn't have died, he or she must have had an underlying condition, so cause of death is unknown.  Maybe 1-2% could be coincidental (it's possible), but when these injuries keep repeating, there is cause and effect.  The ones who want forced vaccination, of course, would try to get you to believe only 1-2% are not coincidental.

IT'S FOR THE GREATER GOOD

Soooo many things wrong with this argument.  Even if we were to assume it was for the greater good, is it OK to sacrifice people for that, either killing them or giving them permanent brain damage or other injuries?  Is it for the greater good when more people are dying from the vaccines than for the diseases the vaccines are for (in the U.S., not in a third world country)?  If that argument is used for any purpose, what else might they use it for?  Perhaps experiment on those in prison, like the Nazi's did?  From all the research I've done, it's not for the greater good, it's for the greater money to the makers of vaccines, and those who benefit from the money, not from the vaccines.

YOU ARE ANTI-VAXX

You may think those who don't want to get vaccinated are anti-vaxx - most are not.  Most are pro choice and pro freedom and pro health.  If you feel you want or need a vaccine or a bunch of them, that is your decision.  But please do your research and be informed of the possible dangers of the vaccines and the diseases they are meant to prevent.  I hope I've helped you find some of that information with my past posts and links.

VETERAN'S DAY 2015

What did our veterans fight for, and what does our military continue to fight for?  We are told for our freedom.  Forced or mandatory vaccinations are not freedom.  If they can take away this basic freedom, then what are we fighting for?  During basic training in the Air Force, I received a mandatory flu shot (literally a shot from a flu gun).  I was sick for the following three days.  I never got another flu shot.  And for the past 10+ years, haven't had the flu, thanks to a proper healthy diet and the right supplements.  Neither of these has side effects.

Hope you all have a wonderful Veteran's Day and a Healthy Life!


2 comments: