A safety study of vaccines has never been done. To do a safety study a group of vaccinated children would have to be compared to a true inert placebo group. Instead of an inert placebo, they use a toxic mix of adjuvants (poisons) or another vaccine. Then when they get the same results in both groups (they know they will), they say, "see, it wasn't the vaccine, vaccines are safe." Actually, by doing these fraudulent studies they are basically admitting vaccines are NOT SAFE. Otherwise, they'd be tripping over themselves to do true safety studies. This should be obvious to the meanest intelligence. They say vaccines need to be made mandatory for the greater good and that they can't do those safety studies because it would be unethical to deprive the placebo group of these vaccines. That's their reasoning. I couldn't make this stuff up. Vaccines, as they are now, kill and permanently injure people, so how can it be ethical to knowingly vaccinate them with something that can kill and injure them? Wouldn't it be for the greater good to do safety studies to improve vaccines, even if it meant depriving some people of something that might protect them? Or perhaps kill and injure them? And guess what - there are around a million children who don't want vaccines. Any of them could be used as placeboes so they don't even have to think about any ethical implications because there wouldn't be any. Yet they continue with this argument.
There has been censorship in the media for quite a while. When was the last time in the media when you heard of someone dying or suffering as a result of a vaccine? Probably never. But on the evening news tonight, they reported a person who died from the flu along with having a strep infection. So they said to get your flu shot. Now the censorship is starting online. Just yesterday, Pinterest started blocking all searches for vaccines due to what they call "misinformation" being posted. Anything that paints vaccines in a negative way that is based on facts is called misinformation. On the other hand, anything pro-vaccination, even when based on lies and fraud is fine. Probably the biggest lie is that vaccines are safe. Imagine if your cars were treated like vaccines - no liability, no safety testing, and you had to buy whichever one they mandated. They just tell you they are safe, and no accidents are ever reported. Who would put up with this? Imagine if all products were like this.
What about autism and the latest on the vaccine-autism link? Pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman originally served as the expert medical witness for the government, which defends vaccines in federal vaccine court. He had testified that vaccines do not cause autism in specific patients. Dr. Zimmerman now has signed a bombshell sworn affidavit. He said that, during a group of 5,000 vaccine-autism cases being heard in court on June 15, 2007, he took aside the Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers he worked for defending vaccines and told them he’d discovered “exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism.” Here's the article: How a pro-vaccine doctor reopened debate about link to autism. Again, I can't make this stuff up. Next, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, M.D., the worlds leading authority of vaccines, being interviewed under oath by the IOM (Institute of Medicine) (go to minute 46:40 - 53:00 of this Highwire link - or you can watch the whole episode, which is worth the watch): Highwire, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, under oath. Stanley Plotkin admitted he doesn't know if vaccines cause autism, so he just decides to assume they don't. He said that, not me. What happened to the precautionary principle, which has four central components: taking preventive action in the face of uncertainty; shifting the burden of proof to the proponents of an activity; exploring a wide range of alternatives to possibly harmful actions; and increasing public participation in decision making.
All of the above are facts. And all of the above is what they want to censor, calling it misinformation, even when straight out of the mouths of the leading experts. Knowing the above, do you want mandatory vaccines? It's all based on lies - vaccines are not safe, there have never been any safety studies comparing vaccinated against a true placebo, most people don't know about VAERS or VICP, vaccines contain numerous toxins and neurotoxins that they tell you are safe, again with no testing, and on and on. The vaccine program is an experiment and it sounds just like something that might have come out of Nazi Germany in the 1930s. But it's here, in the U.S., now - in 2019. Censorship, human rights violations, human experimentation without informed consent. NEVER AGAIN, at least not until the next time. I hope people wake-up soon or it will be EVER AGAIN.
