Medical Experiments, Vaccines, and Freedom

MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS

What is a medical experiment?  This is the best definition that I could find:  "If you manipulate something and see what happens as a result of the change you've made, that is an experiment."  When each person is vaccinated, that person's health is being manipulated and no one knows what effect it will have, therefore it is an experiment on that person.  And, of course, it is a medical procedure.  If you put "when is something a medical experiment" in Google, "Nazi" and "Holocaust" come up at the top of the results.  Here is a link about vaccines, GMO ingredients, and experimentation:  Link.  Although not all vaccines have GMO ingredients, it is really the second part of the article that's relevant to all vaccines.  Here is a link to the California government website that is in the above link:  CA Codes .  According to these codes, it would seem that mandatory vaccination would be illegal, except for the fact that the code gives its own definition of Medical Experiment.  I'm not an attorney, but with their definition, it would seem things are shades of gray (could it be 50), so to speak.  Specifically the part that says, "in a manner not reasonably related to maintaining or improving the health of the subject or otherwise directly benefiting the subject."  The question is whether it is reasonably related to maintaining or improving the health, or does it more often destroy health?  It seems, based on all the evidence I have found, that vaccines are doing more harm than good (see my past articles and links, including to CDC and VAERS).  So does California's SB277 conflict with the California Codes (24170 - 24179.5)?

FREEDOM

Let's forget whether you are pro or anti vaccine - most people fall somewhere in between anyway.  Forget whether they do more harm than good, or whether they work.

Making vaccines mandatory is not about benefit vs risk, it is about freedom.  It is about human rights.  It goes against the Nuremberg Code.  It's against the HHS Belmont Report (HHS.gov).  It's against the AMA's medical ethics.  And the Helsinki Accord.  And perhaps the California Code in California.  I'm sure most people have heard the phrase "Never Again" when referring to Nazi Germany's forced medical experiments.  How can that suddenly be OK in the U.S.?

In the news I often hear about human rights violations in China, Russia, and many other countries. What is it called when they want to make it mandatory to inject you or your child with experimental neurotoxins and carcinogens (mercury, aluminum, MSG, formaldehyde, etc.) as well as aborted fetal cells, monkey cells, etc?  Sounds like a human rights violation to me.

A society can't be free if it has mandatory medical interventions and experiments on its citizens.  And if it's not free, then what else might they do?  Forced drugs?  Put tracking devices on everyone, or something they already carry with them, such as cell phones?

VACCINES

Did I miss seeing all the cases of the flu?  I'm asking because on the news this past week (KNBC) they said that last year's flu vaccine was only 20% effective (I've heard it was even less than that), but that this year they say the vaccine is a good match (but just read this Link today (Oct 23)).  How can they know that (if the flu season hasn't yet started)?  What else did they leave out of this story?  They didn't mention possible side effects of the vaccine, how to make sure your immune system is strong so you can either avoid the flu or recover quicker if you get it.  Perhaps they could have suggested checking on Black Elderberry, Vitamin C, Oil of Oregano, garlic, echinacea, mushrooms, probiotics, etc.  There are lots of other viruses that go around that aren't the flu for which the flu vaccine won't do anything.  It may not do much to prevent the flu.

What do they leave out of the whooping cough commercials?  As always, a lot of the possible side effects.  And that you can be a carrier and spread it even if you are vaccinated - in fact, you won't know you are carrying it if you don't feel the symptoms (because you were vaccinated), even though you may be carrying it.

This was going to be my final comment here, but found some more information to share.  To answer those who say you can't get good information from Googling information about vaccines.  First, unlike the media and drug companies, you'll get BOTH the pros and cons.  Second, you can check statistics on the CDC and VAERS websites, not to mention the websites of scientists, doctors, and others who may not have a conflict of interest and who may not be paid by the drug companies through their advertising or more directly.  With this information you can then come to your own decision.  In fact, many sites direct you to excellent further sources of information.

By researching independent sources and using a bit of logic there is only one conclusion - that vaccines are not safe for everyone.  And if you are one of those who it is not safe for, it might kill you or cause permanent damage to you, as has been done to thousands of people.

Now, about the reporting to VAERS:  You will find this quote (regarding vaccinations at school) at this LINK - "During the week following the delivery of the injections many serious events which are not related to the vaccination are expected: fainting, deaths and convulsions/fits. This needs to be taken into account. Even if it is not rational, if these events happen in class they may damage the general reputation of   vaccinations."

From the above quote, we can assume none of these side effects would be reported to VAERS as they are all apparently "coincidental."  So if you get vaccinated and die a few hours or a week later, sorry, it wasn't the vaccine.  We can't blame the vaccine or people might not get vaccinated, and then maybe they wouldn't die, faint, or have convulsions.  What kind of insane logic is that?  Perhaps that's wwhy many people are pro-vaccine - they've been lied to and think vaccines are 100% safe and protect everyone.  And if anything bad happens after vaccinating their children, they think it was a coincidence because that was what they were told.  At least until they start doing some serious research, which by then may be too late to save their child.

One final comment (really) - you may hear the argument that the mercury, aluminum, MSG, formaldehyde, etc. are in amounts too small to do any harm.  Some of these ingredients are known carcinogens.  And neurotoxins.  First problem with that argument is that by age 6, your child has gotten 49 injections, many of which include these adjuvants.  Second problem, there is no amount that is too small.  Between 1 and 100 nanograms (1/1,000 - 1/10 microgram) of urushiol (active ingredient in poison oak) is enough to cause skin eruptions.  And Botulinum Toxin - 1 microgram can kill 250 people.  You get a lot more adjuvants in all those vaccines.

Hope this helps some people, but more importantly, hope each person researches vaccines and asks their doctors for the vaccine inserts, and reads them.  And ask if your doctor has read them.  To your health!

Risk Free High End Portraits

Wouldn't it be great if you went to the doctor and he or she offered a 100% money back guarantee?  If you're not happy with their service, you don't pay.  That probably will never happen with your doctor, but if I start a photography business again, that will the the cornerstone of it.  And it will be very high end portraits.

I've asked myself why would anyone pay for photography anymore - everyone has a decent camera or cellphone these days and can certainly point it and shoot an image.  The only way someone might pay is if they can't get the quality, lighting, composition, and beauty that a professional photographer is able to get.  And with high end portraiture, it is unlikely people with cellphones, or even good cameras, would be able to get the same results as a professional.

What is high end portraiture?  A portrait that you might see hanging in an art museum, in the White House, in a boardroom, or perhaps in a mansion.  Unfortunately, I can't post a sample here because the computer screen would never be able to convey what the full sized and framed portrait would actually look like in your home or office.  It's impact would be lost.

If it's portraiture of a more intimate nature, the same would apply, although you may not want it hanging on your wall.  In that case, you would receive either an album, book, or boxed in a beautiful custom designed box.

Whether or not I will be doing this in the future is still uncertain, but if I do, it will be announced here.  I could tell you I have the photographic skills with over 30 years experience, but you would be the judge of that, and you would pay nothing if you didn't receive what you were to expect.  No Risk.  If you do choose this type of portraiture, make sure your photographer offers it at no risk to you.

Now that you read this, here is a link to what a high end photo might look like:  High End Photos

Why and How You Should Organize Your Photos

Have you ever taken a photo, filed it away on your computer, and then wanted to see it or post it for some reason?  But couldn't find it?  Maybe you wanted to share it on FB or show it to a friend, but there is no way to know where it might be.  Well, there is software available to help you.

I use LightRoom.  I had been using it for post production editing of photos originally, and it works great for that.  But you can also give your photos keywords, and then search using those keywords.  You can further use a rating system from 1 - 5 stars, 5 being best, to further narrow your searches.
So, for example, let's say I just shot this photo, imported it into LightRoom, and want to add keywords.  One of them would be "Oz," another might be "HotAirBalloon," "Gondola," PurpleDress," "Hat," "BeautifulGirl," etc.  I already have my folder for Halloween 2013, but if I didn't, I would also add that keyword - "Halloween2013."  If I had several years of Halloween, and I do, I would have a folder with "All Halloween Years" and then the individual subfolders with the different years.  Then I could search all the folders by searching the main folder, or the years individually.

I just searched the My Pictures folder (19,582 photos) for "hotair," and this photo came up instantly.  You can also add a picture "label," "title," and "caption" and search by those or by all three plus the keywords.  But the keywords lets you get very specific.

There is a lot more to LightRoom, but this alone makes it worthwhile.  Of course, you have to remember what, or who, was in the photo, so it's important to use any many keywords as possible.